I gave this 1909-S VDB the benefit of doubt since the photo / scan was taken through a flip. My mind tells me that it is 99.5 % a counterfeit, but for those who did bid on this auction, I hope that it is not.
Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set: 1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S. Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
Not even close, it is a fake despite the fact that I could not get a close-up picture. This is a joke.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Scratches are on the coin, right? If you didn't think it was fake before, the scratches are a dead giveaway. Someone deliberately defaced it because it's fake.
<< <i>Scratches are on the coin, right? If you didn't think it was fake before, the scratches are a dead giveaway. Someone deliberately defaced it because it's fake. >>
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Author "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," due out late 2025.
Comments
where is the LOL option on the poll
edit to add:
this is the account that had the 71-cc 10c recently posted.
.
<< <i>.
where is the LOL option on the poll
edit to add:
this is the account that had the 71-cc 10c recently posted.
. >>
Added.
yes same seller.
mbogoman
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/classic-issues-colonials-through-1964/zambezi-collection-trade-dollars/7345Asesabi Lutho
FFC.
<< <i>You're kidding, right?!? >>
.
jeff
HH
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
WS
<< <i>Scratches are on the coin, right? If you didn't think it was fake before, the scratches are a dead giveaway. Someone deliberately defaced it because it's fake.
That makes sense to me.
Those scratches are horrendous and the s is too large for starters..,
Terrible images, even at that I vote FAkE.
Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014
RAD#306
<< <i>- must be the rare Large S variety….
WS >>
as well, it is an ultra-rare off-metal!
.
BHNC #203
TD
No.
Comments?
As sorry as those auction images are,it is still possible to tell that the piece being offered is a fake.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.