Options
How much does depth figure into TPGs evaluation of contact marks?

Strange, I know, but hear me out: two coins, all else equal, both with a couple of unobtrusive contact marks. Let's say coin A has four marks, typical shallow to medium depth for 63-ish coins. Coin B has three marks, but one of them is deep. Not any wider or longer, but deeper than you see a typical bag mark.
Would the TPGs flunk the coin for the depth of the mark? Which would you rather have, if you have to have one?
Would the TPGs flunk the coin for the depth of the mark? Which would you rather have, if you have to have one?
We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
--Severian the Lame
--Severian the Lame
0
Comments
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Visible without any aid in-hand and detracting, from overall appeal, the depth
should make no difference...to the TPG or the owner. IMO
--Severian the Lame
I passed on a 29 S SLQ in 6 FH because it had one immediately noticeable contact mark on Miss Liberty's face and two more subtle ones on her body.
Note - If a coin has attractive color, I've seen cases where more contact marks are allowed on its surfaces for a specific grade (in unc).
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
Lance.
Bottom line: I agree with Lance.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
<< <i>A mark is a mark is a mark.
Visible without any aid in-hand and detracting, from overall appeal, the depth
should make no difference...to the TPG or the owner. IMO >>
...this.