Home U.S. Coin Forum

1800 Large Cent - Please help, is this an NC variety? (reward for correct answer)

coin22lovercoin22lover Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭
edited May 29, 2018 11:35AM in U.S. Coin Forum

Need some serious help...1800's are the worst.
If this really is an NC variety, I'll reward the first person to answer correctly.

Comments

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What reference book are you using?

  • coin22lovercoin22lover Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭
    edited May 29, 2018 11:35AM

    @Insider2 said:
    What reference book are you using?

    Noyes of course

  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The answer could also have been "Breen".

    Smitten with DBLCs.

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,477 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 29, 2018 12:18PM

    By eyesight the date appears to be 1800/1798. I do not have a book on this but using the internet offerings, perhaps an NC6?
    Jim

    edited to add: Her hair does look a little closer to LIBERTY, but can't be sure about her lower curl.


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,681 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1800 large cents are among the toughest to attribute by Sheldon number. I once owned a very nice VF-30, and took me forever to attribute it.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • coin22lovercoin22lover Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭

    @BillJones said:
    1800 large cents are among the toughest to attribute by Sheldon number. I once owned a very nice VF-30, and took me forever to attribute it.

    Indeed. Which is why I need help so badly. If it's really an NC-6 as mentioned above, I'll be dancing in the streets. I almost think I can see a double punched F at the base?

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    IMHO, your coin is not 1800 NC-6. Check S-191 as a possibility.

  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with S-191. Looking at the reverse, the D definitely appears to be high relative to the E - this is the most significant marker to me (not so with the NC-6). Additionally, there appears to be mounding at the fraction.

    The same reverse (as the S-191) was used for the NC-1 but the obverse doesn't match.

    Smitten with DBLCs.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am continually amazed at the detail you copper experts can see in coins on coins in this condition. I would need several years of dedicated study to even begin to feel a degree of comfort around old copper. Cheers, RickO

  • LoveMyLibertyLoveMyLiberty Posts: 1,784 ✭✭✭

    Sorry, I do not believe this is NC-1 to 6. I agree with
    Insider2 that it is S-191 an overdate of 1800 over 1798,
    with style 1 hair.
    It uses obv. 2 and rev. A . The coin is quite eroded to
    say the least, however one can make out certain features.
    -There is a wide gap between N E and E is low at ONE.
    -The E in cent is high.
    -There is a die crack from the rim through the upper I in AMERICA to
    the left of C then to the left crossbar of A & over to the
    right ribbon base.

    • A die crack goes from the left of numerator 1 through the
      right ribbon & up to the left stem base. This path is there but
      hard to discern.
      -The one of the date has a top serif that points to the lower
      curl & is completely left of the drapery.
      -The eight over 7 is close to the 1 & lower than the 1 .
      -The 1st 0 has the remnant of a 9 in it.
      -The reverse ripples under the leaves & left of ONE are
      evident, but hard to see but are easily seen on other examples
      of S-191.
      I used Breen's Encyclopedia of U.S. Large cents 1793-1814
      page 552 & The Dan Holmes Collection Part 1, pg 269.
      Please forgive any misspelling. I am losing my eyesight.
    My Type Set

    R.I.P. Bear image
  • coin22lovercoin22lover Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭

    Oh well! Thanks everyone. I knew deep down it couldn't be an NC.

  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,625 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm in awe of the skills and diligence of some of these guys!
    I own the same books and still have a few coins in better shape than this one that I can't figure out.

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • coin22lovercoin22lover Posts: 3,542 ✭✭✭

    @Walkerguy21D said:
    I'm in awe of the skills and diligence of some of these guys!
    I own the same books and still have a few coins in better shape than this one that I can't figure out.

    1800's are ridiculously difficult.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file