NT or AT?

CopperCollector

Bochiman

I don't like some of that purple...and, when I have submitted ones (some similar) found at coins shows, PCGS hasn't liked them either (at least, mine).

mannie gray

AT

1Mike1

I would say a little of both. The brilliant colors bother me on coins. However, people at this point and time seem a little nutty for coins with colors on them so it doesn't matter AT or NT if you plan to sell.

DoughDeo

AT: For so many reasons.

Flatwoods

They all look like they were intentionally toned.

grip

Most look AT, some may be MA.

ricko

Those are AT coins.... That being said, I am sure they will sell at a premium. Because it seems that collectors really do not care anymore....The market is rife with AT coins, premiums are paid for the damage and profit matters. Cheers, RickO

tincup

AT all the way.

BillJones

They all look artificially toned to me.

Jimnight

AT.

DIMEMAN

@Flatwoods said:
They all look like they were intentionally toned.

I think we have a new term "IT".......I like it. On these coins I think the first coin is probably NT but the rest are questionable.

CopperCollector

@DIMEMAN said:

On these coins I think the first coin is probably NT but the rest are questionable.

I bought them for a little over face all from the same individual. They all are pretty clean coins and look nice, I like them

@DoughDeo said:
AT: For so many reasons.

Please explain.

golden

I think that they have all been helped.

blitzdude

AT on all

CommemKing

Look AT to me.

tonedSilver

I would say AT

SkyMan

AT, although in theory you could pull a 1978 Kennedy that looks something like the above 1978 Kennedy (without the obverse untoned splotchy areas) from an NT Dansco album.

bolivarshagnasty

All AT IMO.

Justacommeman

AT. The one Kennedy might pass

m

Dave99B

All look doctored to me.

Dave

jmski52

I don't necessarily like the look of the bluish toned cupro-nickel but I'd go as far as to say that they all could be NT, stored in poor conditions over time. I would defer to cladking.