@ReggieCleveland said:
Glad this got bumped. I'm adding the URL to my favorites so I never have to search for it again when I want to spread the word of the good book. This tutorial changed my life. I love you, Nic.
Arthur
xoxoxoxoxo
So much love! Thanks! A guy over on the BO forums requested the latest add. I love helping anyone out if they ask.
@ReggieCleveland said:
Glad this got bumped. I'm adding the URL to my favorites so I never have to search for it again when I want to spread the word of the good book. This tutorial changed my life. I love you, Nic.
Arthur
xoxoxoxoxo
So much love! Thanks! A guy over on the BO forums requested the latest add. I love helping anyone out if they ask.
Nic, I went from pretty terrible to pretty good and you can basically see it happen in THIS thread 😂
Thanks again!
Newer efforts…
1947-66 Exhibits Jackie Robinson
Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?
@ReggieCleveland said:
Glad this got bumped. I'm adding the URL to my favorites so I never have to search for it again when I want to spread the word of the good book. This tutorial changed my life. I love you, Nic.
Arthur
xoxoxoxoxo
So much love! Thanks! A guy over on the BO forums requested the latest add. I love helping anyone out if they ask.
Nic, I went from pretty terrible to pretty good and you can basically see it happen in THIS thread 😂
Thanks again!
Newer efforts…
1947-66 Exhibits Jackie Robinson
You need to splurge a little and get a CCD scanner. Makes all the difference in the world.
@ReggieCleveland said:
Glad this got bumped. I'm adding the URL to my favorites so I never have to search for it again when I want to spread the word of the good book. This tutorial changed my life. I love you, Nic.
Arthur
xoxoxoxoxo
So much love! Thanks! A guy over on the BO forums requested the latest add. I love helping anyone out if they ask.
Nic, I went from pretty terrible to pretty good and you can basically see it happen in THIS thread 😂
Thanks again!
Newer efforts…
1947-66 Exhibits Jackie Robinson
You need to splurge a little and get a CCD scanner. Makes all the difference in the world.
Arthur
As with just about every time you post, I’m
Sure you are right here too. But any extra money goes to cards and I am not a tech guy and it’s a three in one scanner-printer-copier. Here’s a small sample of the reason I even have it…
😂👍🤪😂
I make a point of rotating the real things in and out of storage often and these scans are good enough for me.
😉
Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?
@ReggieCleveland said:
Glad this got bumped. I'm adding the URL to my favorites so I never have to search for it again when I want to spread the word of the good book. This tutorial changed my life. I love you, Nic.
Arthur
xoxoxoxoxo
So much love! Thanks! A guy over on the BO forums requested the latest add. I love helping anyone out if they ask.
Nic, I went from pretty terrible to pretty good and you can basically see it happen in THIS thread 😂
Thanks again!
Newer efforts…
1947-66 Exhibits Jackie Robinson
You need to splurge a little and get a CCD scanner. Makes all the difference in the world.
Arthur
As with just about every time you post, I’m
Sure you are right here too. But any extra money goes to cards and I am not a tech guy and it’s a three in one scanner-printer-copier. Here’s a small sample of the reason I even have it…
😂👍🤪😂
I make a point of rotating the real things in and out of storage often and these scans are good enough for me.
😉
Those are some nice scans. I let my 3 in 1 scan those type of document's too. The V600 does the heavy lifting.
Thanks for pointing me to this - would have saved me a ton of time.
Great guide full of lots of excellent tips.
For foil cards (like the 93 SP Jeter) I recommend using a backlight correction technique. This would adjust the gain and bias of each pixel in the image.
If you assume that the original image has a alpha of 1.0 and a beta of 0. you will step the alpha up between about 1.0 and 3.0 and adjust the beta between 0 and 100. The alpha adjusts the contrast and the beta adjusts the brightness. You could probably go as high as 2.0 on alpha and 50 on brightness and get a "shimmery" result. Both of these will introduce a linear frequency response to the image improving the legibility and brightness.
Here's an example.
This is the output from the scanner. Pretty basic default scanner settings.
Here's the adjustment I am referring to above.
Here's what most scanners would do with a gamma adjustment.
I guess judge for yourself which is better. I think that the ab-scaling vs. gamma-scaling produces a more rich output for these image types. But, I guess it's like both are fine, and maybe only image-nerds care.
Here's a quick little example if anyone wants to try it.
`import numpy as np;
import cv2 as cv;
import math as m;
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
Comments
Nic=The master of card scanning!!!
So much love! Thanks! A guy over on the BO forums requested the latest add. I love helping anyone out if they ask.
Nic
Guides Authored - Graded Card Scanning Guide PDF | History of the PSA Label PDF
Thanks Jack! Dare I say you are the master of Griffey Star cards?!!
Nic
Guides Authored - Graded Card Scanning Guide PDF | History of the PSA Label PDF
LOL, Not quite but thank you!!
Nic, I went from pretty terrible to pretty good and you can basically see it happen in THIS thread 😂
Thanks again!
Newer efforts…
1947-66 Exhibits Jackie Robinson
Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?
https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/987963/1951-wheaties-premium-photos-set-registry#latest
You need to splurge a little and get a CCD scanner. Makes all the difference in the world.
Arthur
As with just about every time you post, I’m
Sure you are right here too. But any extra money goes to cards and I am not a tech guy and it’s a three in one scanner-printer-copier. Here’s a small sample of the reason I even have it…
😂👍🤪😂
I make a point of rotating the real things in and out of storage often and these scans are good enough for me.
😉
Curious about the rare, mysterious and beautiful 1951 Wheaties Premium Photos?
https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/987963/1951-wheaties-premium-photos-set-registry#latest
Thank you @NGS428. Very helpful! Now I know why my scans suck (I have CIS vs CCD). Probably time for an upgrade...lol
As far as graded cards go, remember CIS = Can’t Image For the S use whatever word you want...
Nic
Guides Authored - Graded Card Scanning Guide PDF | History of the PSA Label PDF
Those are some nice scans. I let my 3 in 1 scan those type of document's too. The V600 does the heavy lifting.
Nic
Guides Authored - Graded Card Scanning Guide PDF | History of the PSA Label PDF
Nic,
Thanks for pointing me to this - would have saved me a ton of time.
Great guide full of lots of excellent tips.
For foil cards (like the 93 SP Jeter) I recommend using a backlight correction technique. This would adjust the gain and bias of each pixel in the image.
If you assume that the original image has a alpha of 1.0 and a beta of 0. you will step the alpha up between about 1.0 and 3.0 and adjust the beta between 0 and 100. The alpha adjusts the contrast and the beta adjusts the brightness. You could probably go as high as 2.0 on alpha and 50 on brightness and get a "shimmery" result. Both of these will introduce a linear frequency response to the image improving the legibility and brightness.
Here's an example.
This is the output from the scanner. Pretty basic default scanner settings.
Here's the adjustment I am referring to above.
Here's what most scanners would do with a gamma adjustment.
I guess judge for yourself which is better. I think that the ab-scaling vs. gamma-scaling produces a more rich output for these image types. But, I guess it's like both are fine, and maybe only image-nerds care.
Here's a quick little example if anyone wants to try it.
`import numpy as np;
import cv2 as cv;
import math as m;
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
imgO_nom = "/mnt/e/cards/ebay/2024_DGPT_Tattar_S25_FR.png";
imgO = cv.imread(imgO_nom, cv.IMREAD_UNCHANGED);
h = m.floor(imgO.shape[1] / 4);
w = m.floor(imgO.shape[0] / 4);
imgO = cv.resize(imgO, (h,w), cv.INTER_LINEAR);
h,w = imgO.shape[:2];
print("Image: ", w,h);
cv.imshow("a", imgO);
cv.imwrite("/mnt/e/cards/example/a.png", imgO);
a = 2.2;
b = 30;
imgB = imgO.copy();
for y in range(imgB.shape[0]):
for x in range(imgB.shape[1]):
for z in range(imgB.shape[2]):
imgB[y,x,z] = np.clip(a * imgB[y,x,z] + b, 0, 255);
cv.imshow("b", imgB);
cv.imwrite("/mnt/e/cards/example/b.png", imgB);
lut = np.empty((1,256), np.uint8);
for i in range(256):
lut[0,i] = np.clip(pow(i/255.0, 0.3) * 255.0, 0, 255);
imgC = cv.LUT(imgO, lut);
cv.imshow("c", imgC);
cv.imwrite("/mnt/e/cards/example/c.png", imgC);
while True:
key = cv.waitKey(0);
if key == 27:
print("Exit");
break;
`
Thanks for the input @bgr ! Not sure I can successfully use the code you posted, but I’ll give it a few more reads.
Using my settings in the guide, my meter looks like this. My main goal is to get it to look like it does in hand. This one seems to be close as is.
Most of the feedback I get is on refractor cards and people wanting to see that refractor look. That has been a tough one to crack on a scanner.
Nic
Guides Authored - Graded Card Scanning Guide PDF | History of the PSA Label PDF
Here's a quick example with the Jeter.
Here's your image... enhanced.
My scanner was a little brighter than what I was expecting there so that is somewhat over-saturated and looks worse. But yours looks better I think.