Yes, it's the same coin. The thing that concerns me is if the toning keeps on growing. I don't think that the camera / lighting angle could make this much of a difference. If the toning is due to a less than perfect dip rinse, trouble could be ahead.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Anyone care to comment on the thought process they went through to reach their conclusion. That type of post may help the OP and many others to learn some tricks.
Compare the toning spots (holes in the toning) and patterns. There are too many matches to call it mere coincidence
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
@AllCoinsRule said:
I know they're the same coin. I was just wondering what happened to make it look so different (just lighting or something more sinister?). It is fbl.
+1. Really bizarre. Can't imagine that different shooting angles and/or lighting can make the obverse look as different as those two shots.
Some refer to overgraded slabs as Coffins. I like to think of them as Happy Coins.
Comments
Apparently so.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Definitely appears to be the same coin and the angle of lighting on the coin appears to have changed, as well.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Absolutely.
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
Without question.
Yes.
Definitely... all the 'markings' are there... just different lighting.... Cheers, RickO
Yes, it's the same coin. The thing that concerns me is if the toning keeps on growing. I don't think that the camera / lighting angle could make this much of a difference. If the toning is due to a less than perfect dip rinse, trouble could be ahead.
Same
Pretty coin. I don't see it on CoinFacts.
Anyone care to comment on the thought process they went through to reach their conclusion. That type of post may help the OP and many others to learn some tricks.
Compare the toning spots (holes in the toning) and patterns. There are too many matches to call it mere coincidence
To many areas of toning, areas without toning etc. for it not to be the same coin.
it's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide
+1. Really bizarre. Can't imagine that different shooting angles and/or lighting can make the obverse look as different as those two shots.
All the light tricks in the world can't hide the **big black spot" over the "T." That's what I saw first.
Same. Pretty coin, too IMO.