I would say no grade because of improper cleaning. The color is off, if that is how the piece looks in person, and there are many hairlines. There are also haloes around a couple of the stars which indicates alterations in the surfaces. The mark under the "R" in "LIBERTY" will not help the cause either, especially if there is a raised spot opposite it on the reverse.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
@mannie gray said:
Either a no grade or netted down considerably......which is essentially the same thing (?)
My vote is that they gave her a grade...like F15/VF20.
Agree, Very tough call when it's binary grade/no grade and when its kind if close like this, looking forward to seeing the reverse, from here leaning 98.
I'd say anywhere from XF-45 to AU-50, if it grades. Looks like the reverse has been cleaned/wiped. I see what appears to be wipe lines in the star field. The "mushy" things above the stars are clouds.
@KindaNewish said:
kind of off topic, but I am still learning. What do we call those mushy blob things above the stars and below "STATES OF" on the reverse?
Here's a 2nd set to chew on. Which variety (large/small stars) and B number is this example?
I will post a 3rd set to reveal that somewhat interesting detail.
@ricko said:
I would say... if they ignore the cleaning and the hit - possible due to what the coin is - then XF40/45.... hard to say on this one...Cheers, RickO
I suspect that you and I are "oldtimers." I agree with the XF grade but I'll bet it is in an AU slab! IMO, AU-50 would have been a better grade as it would have made more of the conservative guessers (like me) happy.
So, I'll guess AU-55 Cleaned or AU-50 straight grade. I hope it is "detailed."
@KindaNewish said:
kind of off topic, but I am still learning. What do we call those mushy blob things above the stars and below "STATES OF" on the reverse?
Read more Spend hour upon hour looking at pictures in the Heritage Auction Archives
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
Since PCGS does not state the reason for the 98 how could we know. It might be the rim ding on the reverse at 6 in addition to the dig on the obverse. Or maybe a spot or planchet streak removed that we just can't see.
I think it is a lovely coin but cannot argue with PCGS.
bob
Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
Comments
well, that depends on how the 'powers that be' consider the hit below the Y.
I'd say yes, if reverse is as nice, a # grade
BHNC #203
I would say no grade because of improper cleaning. The color is off, if that is how the piece looks in person, and there are many hairlines. There are also haloes around a couple of the stars which indicates alterations in the surfaces. The mark under the "R" in "LIBERTY" will not help the cause either, especially if there is a raised spot opposite it on the reverse.
Either a no grade or netted down considerably......which is essentially the same thing (?)
My vote is that they gave her a grade...like F15/VF20.
OP stated: "but assuming its not cleaned, does it get a numeric grade?"
Yes (assuming it is not cleaned), probably VF30ish.
Agree, Very tough call when it's binary grade/no grade and when its kind if close like this, looking forward to seeing the reverse, from here leaning 98.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
reverse posted. harsh halogen lamp.
Now with the reverse posted and a description on the lighting I'm going with XF45!
Given the description re cleaning and lighting, I'll go net XF40.
If straight graded, it woul be a 45-50
kind of off topic, but I am still learning. What do we call those mushy blob things above the stars and below "STATES OF" on the reverse?
I'd say anywhere from XF-45 to AU-50, if it grades. Looks like the reverse has been cleaned/wiped. I see what appears to be wipe lines in the star field. The "mushy" things above the stars are clouds.
'dude
A rendition of clouds.
It looks harshly cleaned to me.
Here's a 2nd set to chew on. Which variety (large/small stars) and B number is this example?
I will post a 3rd set to reveal that somewhat interesting detail.
Small stars, BD-7.
I would say... if they ignore the cleaning and the hit - possible due to what the coin is - then XF40/45.... hard to say on this one...Cheers, RickO
I suspect that you and I are "oldtimers." I agree with the XF grade but I'll bet it is in an AU slab! IMO, AU-50 would have been a better grade as it would have made more of the conservative guessers (like me) happy.
So, I'll guess AU-55 Cleaned or AU-50 straight grade. I hope it is "detailed."
Read more
Spend hour upon hour looking at pictures in the Heritage Auction Archives 
45-53, no bean
EF40 BLUE BEAN
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Finale posted on the OP
Relieved
I would crack the coin out and send it to NGC
I
Since PCGS does not state the reason for the 98 how could we know. It might be the rim ding on the reverse at 6 in addition to the dig on the obverse. Or maybe a spot or planchet streak removed that we just can't see.
I think it is a lovely coin but cannot argue with PCGS.
bob