My grade would be AU-50, but since it's probably in an NGC holder, it's probably an AU-55 or 58.
Some of the design weakness is due to strike, but the coin also has a small rub. It's also been dipped, but that usually doesn't matter so far as the grade is concerned.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
It's nice, but one of the keys in the AU and Mint State grades is the luster, and looks subdued on this piece, perhaps because it was dipped.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
@BillJones said:
My grade would be AU-50, but since it's probably in an NGC holder, it's probably an AU-55 or 58.
Some of the design weakness is due to strike, but the coin also has a small rub. It's also been dipped, but that usually doesn't matter so far as the grade is concerned.
Isn't it funny that the old and rare get a "pass" on being dipped. TPGs, say it like it is and let the market establish value.
BTW, I love the coin and its history. AU53 is my guess.
VanHalen got the grade before I did.
I have sold off several early type coins in NGC holders that have this look; I suspect that my coins were once PCGS 58s that were upgraded
@BillJones said:
My grade would be AU-50, but since it's probably in an NGC holder, it's probably an AU-55 or 58.
Some of the design weakness is due to strike, but the coin also has a small rub. It's also been dipped, but that usually doesn't matter so far as the grade is concerned.
Isn't it funny that the old and rare get a "pass" on being dipped. TPGs, say it like it is and let the market establish value.
BTW, I love the coin and its history. AU53 is my guess.
Except this one. NGC put this 1796 half dime in a body bag.
i was expecting to get a VF-30 out of this. Instead I got nothing.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Here is some advice. Don't try and cross it into the same grade.
Here is a PCGS AU-58. The dealer who brought this coin back from England tried to get it into a Mint State holder a couple of times in the year 2000. Obviously, it didn’t work because Ms. Liberty need to “powder her nose” which is too bright to pass for Unc.
A London dealer bought this piece from one of those ubiquitous “little old ladies with change purse.”
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Similar situation to an 1803 half dime I had in NGC AU58. Very sharp, no apparent rub on the high points. But certainly lightly cleaned in its past and sporting some field gouges. Only about 15% luster remaining. Boy, was I shocked when the next owner got an NGC MS62 regrade out of it....and upped the value by 50%
Comments
Hard to tell from the pics.
I'll go first.
AU55
XF 40?
MS62
XF40......Nice old coin... Cheers, RickO
Super nice!
ill say a 58 or even low ms
MS
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
My grade would be AU-50, but since it's probably in an NGC holder, it's probably an AU-55 or 58.
Some of the design weakness is due to strike, but the coin also has a small rub. It's also been dipped, but that usually doesn't matter so far as the grade is concerned.
I like it!
Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners.
AU-55, and very nice!
BHNC #203
It's nice, but one of the keys in the AU and Mint State grades is the luster, and looks subdued on this piece, perhaps because it was dipped.
Since I can't grade from photos I'm going to give myself a wide range
High AU- Low MS
NGC 62
Commems and Early Type
AU 55
AU59+
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Isn't it funny that the old and rare get a "pass" on being dipped. TPGs, say it like it is and let the market establish value.
BTW, I love the coin and its history. AU53 is my guess.
I see a AU50, if conservatively graded xf45.
Numismatics & Photography
rv@ravenumismatics.com
Instagram.com/coin2photo
Neat coin!
XF45
Dave
we have a winnah!
Whatever the grade, it's a fabulous coin!
VanHalen got the grade before I did.
I have sold off several early type coins in NGC holders that have this look; I suspect that my coins were once PCGS 58s that were upgraded
Commems and Early Type
Except this one. NGC put this 1796 half dime in a body bag.
i was expecting to get a VF-30 out of this. Instead I got nothing.
NGC AU55. Though a 58 grade would not surprise me. The grade would be different if it were PCGS.
my guess is 55.
45... Looks as if it could be an older NGC holder... I suspect it could grade 50 if resubmitted
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
bingo!
Here is some advice. Don't try and cross it into the same grade.
Here is a PCGS AU-58. The dealer who brought this coin back from England tried to get it into a Mint State holder a couple of times in the year 2000. Obviously, it didn’t work because Ms. Liberty need to “powder her nose” which is too bright to pass for Unc.
A London dealer bought this piece from one of those ubiquitous “little old ladies with change purse.”
Similar situation to an 1803 half dime I had in NGC AU58. Very sharp, no apparent rub on the high points. But certainly lightly cleaned in its past and sporting some field gouges. Only about 15% luster remaining. Boy, was I shocked when the next owner got an NGC MS62 regrade out of it....and upped the value by 50%
200+ year old US coins aren't so much Graded, as Appraised versus their populations.
This is often very difficult for collectors of more modern coins to understand
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry