What do you call this MESS?......
WorldSavingBlog
Posts: 15 ✭
There are letters missing, numbers missing, stuff looks doubled on the back. The monument left side looks doubled.
Tagged:
2
Comments
I'm far from an expert, but a bad forgery? Obverse date numbers (what there are of them) in the date look too large & out-of-place, and lettering in "Liberty" look amateurish. Missing Lincoln statue in the Memorial, etc.....
It is a mess, for sure. Good eye in catching it. I vote for major ejection doubling/shearing of letters, and maybe grease filled die.
Or, maybe struck twice with slight rotation in between strikes? (That explanation might have some value).
I have never seen an obverse such as this, interesting / drastic occurrence.
Is it a 1991 - D ?
I'm sure one of the many experts know exactly, as stated above.
R.I.P Son 1986>2020
I agree with @DBK...grease filled die, ejection doubling.... Cheers, RickO
I agree - grease filled die.
+1
POST NUBILA PHOEBUS / AFTER CLOUDS, SUN
Love for Music / Collector of Dreck
I concur.
Grease filled die with ejection doubling.
Die lines show that the dies were worked on to clean up previous messes.
Interesting coin.
Is that 1997 I think? That is super interesting. I wonder if the PCGS label has enough space to describe it!
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
I call it "Ebay Gold!!"
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
A "Bad Penny."
Neat error coin.
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
"Lincoln gone wild"
Grease filled die. Great eye to catch such a coin.
I am more inclined to say weak strike, but cannot be sure.
Common.
I believe it is a 1991 no mint mark. Would PCGS even take it?
It looks to be a filled die
> I agree - grease filled die.
I disagree. Fully. That looks to me like it was struck, never got ejected or ejected properly, and struck again - maybe struck 3 times.
I've never sent in a coin to PCGS, would they even take it? Would any of you send it in?
With such strong design rims?
Greased die obv
BHNC #203
I would have called it "worn out" and threw it in the recycling bin. Nice find and good luck
That was my first thought as well. However, the rim looks fairly well formed for a weak strike. I tend to think the coin was struck a grease-filled die (a die with "grease" residue that was not properly removed before striking coins).
The "doubling" is an artifact as others have stated. It's called strike doubling, machine doubling, or ejection doubling. While interesting to examine, it's common and carries no premium in value.
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
I believe that a well-upset planchet rim can produce a well-struck rim on an otherwise weakly struck coin. I am just not sure if that was the case on this coin.
Personally, (if it is determined to be a greased filled die with ejection doubling) I would not send it in to be graded as the cost of grading/encapsulation will exceed the value of the coin.
ANA LM
USAF Retired — 34 years of active military service! 🇺🇸