Nice coin, nice strike, and a date that I like - though it seems most prefer 13P T1 and 38D's - my guess that the luster and color is a little better in hand, and that the grade on the rattler is a 63 but it's got a shot today at 64.
I usually don't overgrade. I'm kinda shocked at the 62 grade. But I got to thinking. Low or no problem coins that come back low like this one could have some minor rub - very minor - so it would be better suited as a 62 rather than a 58.
1914-S was generally well struck for the most part. Of course it comes with the weak LIBERTY as all pre-1916 Buffs do.
The knot is sharp, the top feather is extremely close to being fully rendered, and the fully struck reverse is a knockout!
Those are all the "excuses" for blowing the grade that I can think of.
Pete
"I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
Alain is a good man and I very much enjoy his beautiful collection. He has a refined eye for the buffalo nickel series and is well respected on this forum.
The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
Comments
58
Nice strike but no clue on luster, guessing a little flat? 63 or thereabouts.
Looks 62/63 from the picture... interesting die crack - maybe two.... Cheers, RickO
Nice coin, nice strike, and a date that I like - though it seems most prefer 13P T1 and 38D's - my guess that the luster and color is a little better in hand, and that the grade on the rattler is a 63 but it's got a shot today at 64.
Mint mark is very high-could be a so called imbedded "S."
Just saying, because I don't know for sure about this particular coin. Supposedly there were 2 dies that had 1914/3-S attributes.
The coins had a die crack - or cracks on the obverse that connected the rim to the feather.
The other was the "embedded S touching the C" reverse.
The above coin shows both.
Food for thought. The diagnostics came from David Langes' Third edition Buffalo Book.
Pete
I do believe I see some wear in there. Still a nice looking piece. 58
That's a beautiful nickel with nice toning and a great strike.
I've seen coins in slabs pictured on here that I thought DEFINITLY had wear, only to find they were MS.
So....if not a 58 - then 66 or better.
Pete
I dislike grading from pictures.
I would guess 65 from the images.
The Whisker Cheek Collection - Top 50 Peace VAM Registry
Landmark Buffalo Collection
So, this pickup was courtesy of ad4400... He has helped me steadily build a decent set of Buffs.
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
I usually don't overgrade. I'm kinda shocked at the 62 grade. But I got to thinking. Low or no problem coins that come back low like this one could have some minor rub - very minor - so it would be better suited as a 62 rather than a 58.
1914-S was generally well struck for the most part. Of course it comes with the weak LIBERTY as all pre-1916 Buffs do.
The knot is sharp, the top feather is extremely close to being fully rendered, and the fully struck reverse is a knockout!
Those are all the "excuses" for blowing the grade that I can think of.
Pete
If you are working with Alain, you are in good hands!
He has evolved into one of our forum resident Buffalo expert specialists over the years.
I agree, Walkerguy21D................been knowing Alain since I joined in 2005.
Pete
Nice... Thanks for the slab pictures.... Cheers, RickO
Alain is a good man and I very much enjoy his beautiful collection. He has a refined eye for the buffalo nickel series and is well respected on this forum.
I'd have to think with that and a 62 grade there would be hairlines or something. Nice.