Options
Which would you buy?

Which would you buy?
Assumptions:
1) the price is equal, or nearly so.
2) you had the funds.
3) you want the coin.
4) there is no reasonable expectation that a nicer one will come along in 10 years.
Coin A: NGC XF details, holed, scratched.
Coin B: NGC VF35.
Which would you buy?
This is a public poll: others will see what you voted for.
0
Comments
Coin B is under graded by comparison. Some wear attribution appears to be worn dies. IMHO
FOR SALE Items
Tough call, coin B looks like it may be ED. Assuming that isn't the case I'd go with B
Latin American Collection
Tough call. I chose B, but only because I am thinking of potential transfer opportunities in the future. However, if my purpose was to display clarity of design, I would go with A.
DPOTD
If B is as unwholesome as it looks in the image, I'd go with A.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
It is and I did, but I really like to hear people's rationale.
Most collectors despise a hole.
Gilboy has the variety without assayer and value as R5. At this end of the rarity spectrum I say Coin A -- the hole is a distraction but otherwise the visual appeal is superior. Coin B looks like it might have environmental damage.
Coin B looks like it may not belong in a straight graded holder. In this particular case I would go with A.
8 Reales Madness Collection
Not to be a pain... Not voting as the images may not capture the essence of either coin.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
You're a pain.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
They are both auction company images, so I would hope they both show their respective coins in the best light.
Went with B. Like already stated, despise holes.
And that might be part of my concern... The best light might not adequately capture the coins in the terms I would feel comfortable making a decision or even rendering an opinion. Both coins have viable arguments.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
I am not a set builder per se so I would pass on both.
My goal is to own a group of coins that all make me happy when I hold them. Having a complete set of any series is not important to me.
B, couldn't accept the hole.
Doesn't the answer sort of depend on what the coin is for? If for a low-grade set, then B. But if for a higher grade set, then A. Remember that the hole in A can be filled and the details expertly repaired.
How does one get a hater to stop hating?
I can be reached at evillageprowler@gmail.com
Well, yes, I didn't list every possible assumption.
I think it's interesting to hear people's opinion based on their collecting experiences.
While I like coin A, I would never consider filling the hole. I consider that doctoring.
BTW, those are the two finest specimens of the type (1732-Mo 1/2 R without assayer) that I know of.