I believe I'm mostly seeing the sides and tops of the numerals (wider at the bottom).
Looks like the lower left side of the 8 has doubling, though. Not sure if strike doubling.
Have you looked at it with a stereo microscope?
Are you talking about the upper left side of the 5? Does appear to be strike doubling.
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
@yosclimber said:
I believe I'm mostly seeing the sides and tops of the numerals (wider at the bottom).
Looks like the lower left side of the 8 has doubling, though. Not sure if strike doubling.
Have you looked at it with a stereo microscope?
Theory: The date was entered using a '184' logo punch then the 5 was added. The 184 was punched in DEEP, the 5 not so much.
You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
Comments
I believe I'm mostly seeing the sides and tops of the numerals (wider at the bottom).
Looks like the lower left side of the 8 has doubling, though. Not sure if strike doubling.
Have you looked at it with a stereo microscope?
Are you talking about the upper left side of the 5? Does appear to be strike doubling.
The upper part of the 8 and 4 is what I'm looking at.
I don't have the coin in hand,
Definitely looks like machine doubling...with the cautionary point being the lower left of the 8.... JMO.... Cheers, RickO
Definitely not the RPD FS-301, which is most evident at the flag of the 5.
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
Theory: The date was entered using a '184' logo punch then the 5 was added. The 184 was punched in DEEP, the 5 not so much.