Options
White Rattlers startying with PCGS # 108

I am wiling to start a census for these very rare holders. Now with the PCGS Museum of Holders getting so much publicity, this is probably a good time. I have two:
1904 $20 Gold MS63 #1084838
1898-O Morgan $1 MS63 #1081992
Could someone with more knowledge that I about posting images to the message boards, please PM me and explain so I post these images
Thanks
Howard
1904 $20 Gold MS63 #1084838
1898-O Morgan $1 MS63 #1081992
Could someone with more knowledge that I about posting images to the message boards, please PM me and explain so I post these images
Thanks
Howard
0
Comments
Howard
I have thought about the fact that the maximum amount of coins that could be white rattlers is 9,999. I put about 100 random numbers into the PCGS search and got hits on about 60%. But how many of these still exist- who knows? I feel coins to be included in the census should only be coins owned or previously owned by posters or ones that have images included. Thoughts?
Howard
At the very least the cert numbers should still be in the PCGS database.
Coin Rarities Online
I misread number. Sorry. 6,900 coins in the first two weeks sounds more like it.
No, I first put the count starting with 108, but not 108xxxx, but 108xxxxx (so graded much later). I had to look for those between 1080000 and 1090000.
Has anyone started a census of these white label rattlers?
One just sold at GreatCollections this Sunday for strong money at $1,265.
Certification Number: 1081304
http://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/435402/1935-Texas-Centennial-Half-Dollar-PCGS-MS-65-CAC-OGH-1st-Gen
I don't have a picture -- I have 1900-P Morgan MS62 1081408
I messaged with hle04 some, seems he was here for a short time and hasn't been here since Nov. Another thread "Learn something new" was started by hle04.
Some white labels are listed there. I have begun checking valid cert numbers on my down time at work.
I thought that data would be a good start.
Bst transactions with: dimeman, oih82w8, mercurydimeguy, dunerlaw, Lakesammman, 2ltdjorn, MattTheRiley, dpvilla, drddm, CommemKing, Relaxn, Yorkshireman, Cucamongacoin, jtlee321, greencopper, coin22lover, coinfolio, lindedad, spummybum, Leeroybrown, flackthat, BryceM, Surfinxhi, VanHalen, astrorat, robkool, Wingsrule, PennyGuy, al410, Ilikecolor, Southcounty, Namvet69, Commemdude, oreville, Leebone, Rob41281, clarkbar04, cactusjack55, Collectorcoins, sniocsu, coin finder
Checking the early cert numbers is cool, but doesn't mean the coins are still in a white label rattler holder. Coins should not be added to any potential census of these unless someone here has seen them still in the holder!
The Texas commemorative went pretty strong on Great Collections on Sunday as mentioned, but there was another listed there as well... an 1899 $5 Liberty in MS63 cert. no 1081973 that also sold for a substantial premium.
greatcollections.com/Coin/435403/1899-Liberty-Gold-Half-Eagle-PCGS-MS-63-OGH-1st-Gen
Both probably would have sold for even more had they been advertised as "white label" rattlers, though it's clear at least a couple of bidders found them anyways.
I had three of them on my website recently, all have sold.
1946 Walking Liberty Half Dollar MS64 cert no. 1081235
1882-S Morgan Dollar MS64 cert no. 1081722
1898-O Morgan Dollar MS63 CAC cert no. 1081992
If no one else seems to want to keep a census thread of these, want me to start one???
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
Go for it!
I won't help tho....never seen one in hand....
I was an underbidder on both of those on GC...the Texas went for insane money.
I realize that a valid cert is not an indication that a coin is still in a white label. Checking the certs would only give a number of possible white labels remaining.
The highest cert number I have seen or heard of so far is my walker 43d 1082350.
Another piece of info that needs to be determined is where the cert numbers are when the transition from 1.0 and 1.1 occurs. It is near 1081000.
Bst transactions with: dimeman, oih82w8, mercurydimeguy, dunerlaw, Lakesammman, 2ltdjorn, MattTheRiley, dpvilla, drddm, CommemKing, Relaxn, Yorkshireman, Cucamongacoin, jtlee321, greencopper, coin22lover, coinfolio, lindedad, spummybum, Leeroybrown, flackthat, BryceM, Surfinxhi, VanHalen, astrorat, robkool, Wingsrule, PennyGuy, al410, Ilikecolor, Southcounty, Namvet69, Commemdude, oreville, Leebone, Rob41281, clarkbar04, cactusjack55, Collectorcoins, sniocsu, coin finder
Now these white rattler holders are drawing a premium? I did not know that.. guess I better go look in my coin cabinet..... might have unknown treasures lurking in one of the drawers....
Cheers, RickO
I am under the impression that the generation 1 holder are 1.0 with numbers 1080xxx and 1.1 with numbers 1081xxx. The holders with numbers 1082xxx thru 1089xxx are not generation 1 holders; they have light green inserts (or a faded green which looks white) and don't really have a premium value.
I have one . . . . a Frankie Proof. I will go check the number. I love the idea of a Census . . .
Drunner
A small number of 1082xxx holders are also white labels. I don't know when they switched.
I was watching this one on eBay. If it gets delisted you can go for it....

Illini420,
If you are willing...Run with it. My computer skills are lacking.
Some that I have personally seen pictures of, and from the above posts:
1080129 1851 3cs ms63
1080145 1909 $5 ms63
1080197 1904O S$1 ms64
1080508 1944D 50c ms65
1080560 1938 50c PR65
1080596 1900 $2.50 ms64
1080710 1941 10c PR65
1081878 1892 S$1 ms62
1080805 1881S S$1 ms64
1081041 1926 $2.50 Sesqui ms63
1081045 1917 $5 McKin ms63
1081235 1946 50c ms64
1081408 1900 S$1 ms62
1081544 1882S S$1 ms63
1081722 1882S S$1ms64
1081819 1882S S$1 ms65
1081957 1936S 50c oregon ms65
1081958 1938D 50c oregon ms66
1081973 1899 $5 ms63
1081992 1898O S$1 ms63
1082350 1943D 50c ms63
I will verify these cert nos. for accuracy tomorrow
Bst transactions with: dimeman, oih82w8, mercurydimeguy, dunerlaw, Lakesammman, 2ltdjorn, MattTheRiley, dpvilla, drddm, CommemKing, Relaxn, Yorkshireman, Cucamongacoin, jtlee321, greencopper, coin22lover, coinfolio, lindedad, spummybum, Leeroybrown, flackthat, BryceM, Surfinxhi, VanHalen, astrorat, robkool, Wingsrule, PennyGuy, al410, Ilikecolor, Southcounty, Namvet69, Commemdude, oreville, Leebone, Rob41281, clarkbar04, cactusjack55, Collectorcoins, sniocsu, coin finder
That is not a white label rattler... not all PCGS slabs starting w/ 108 make the cut...
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
If I can remember I'll pull out my rattler box tomorrow.
If you look at the proof Franklin, you can see the horizontal depressions in the paper that are lacking in the white rattlers. Keeps posted a good example some time ago.
Helpful to note if the pic is washed out and looks like a OWR (old white rattler).
Here is the other thread with many pictures:
https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/comment/11563778#Comment_11563778
@illini420 let me know if you want to create the census. If not, I'm willing to help create it.
Ok, started up a census thread and added a few others to the list that I found... here's the thread and please let me know if you have any additions:
New Census Thread
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448