Home U.S. Coin Forum

How bad do you hate MS62s?

topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
What's wrong with me?

I see a purty coin and it says 62 on it and I can see "why" and still becuz it's purty, I wanna get it and I know I'll kick myself and always look at that dumb number on the slab and why don't I collect purty rocks?



image

Comments

  • CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yep...



    image

  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I owned a wonderful NGC MS62 1858-0 quarter back in 1988. Full luster, nice color, and no bad marks. One of the few real unc 58-0 quarters I've ever seen/handled. There's no AU58 that could have held a candle to it....even today. Cost me about $475.



    On the flip side, one of favorite retailers shipped me a different NGC MS62 1858-0 quarter back around 2003-2004 at an ask price of $2200-$2500. The coin didn't even have close to full field luster and was heavy with high point rub. I graded that one a decent AU58/55. Needless to say it got sent right back to them. Some MS62's are great and others not good at all.

    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,513 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: roadrunner
    I owned a wonderful NGC MS62 1858-0 quarter back in 1988. Full luster, nice color, and no bad marks. One of the few real unc 58-0 quarters I've ever seen/handled. There's no AU58 that could have held a candle to it....even today. Cost me about $475.

    On the flip side, one of favorite retailers shipped me a different NGC MS62 1858-0 quarter back around 2003-2004 at an ask price of $2200-$2500. The coin didn't even have close to full field luster and was heavy with high point rub. I graded that one a decent AU58/55. Needless to say it got sent right back to them. Some MS62's are great and others not good at all.


    Honestly, in this case the first coin sounds like it's an MS64 or better and the second coin an AU.
    Neither appear to be a legit 62.

    peacockcoins

  • JohnnyCacheJohnnyCache Posts: 1,813 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I love my 62's. I'm particularly fond of this one, and I think it's nicer in hand.

    image


    image
  • Desert MoonDesert Moon Posts: 5,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    topstuf, I missing something in your reasoning, cause I have some nice 62's................

    Best, SH

    image

    image

    image

    image
    My online coin store - https://desertmoonnm.com/
  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    62 is like any other grade......there are great ones and awful ones.
  • ksuscottksuscott Posts: 283 ✭✭✭
    I'm in the camp that likes 62's....at least the right ones. The number on the holder doesn't deter me, but I'm not working on a top pop set. I like coins with original surfaces and mint luster. We can't all be 65's...I know I'm not. image
  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,635 ✭✭✭✭✭
    When I first started investing in coins MS64 was my minimum grade based on a coin investment book I had read. This has since changed to MS65 as values of these coins easier to find in CW (which does not list MS64 for many issues). Many mornings over coffee I will do a search for PCGS 65 on my iPhone for ebay with CW handy then look up coin in PCGS CF putting together Want List and inputs to AS. I use my iPhone as the primary tool.

    I do have lower grade coins (than MS65) on deals I bought or auctions I won where cost is considerably less than Market Value.

    Demand can move sideways where people priced out, that is if a collector / investor can not afford an issue or type in MS65, he may collect a series more affordable or simply bulk up on what suits him. For mods I favor MS69 but do have some MS70's where won just a few bucks over 69 price. Most of my bidding on mods are x dollars above melt and I like getting them for less than melt plus slab cost or like 50% of MV per TPG price guide. For vintage coins say like at a show - material brought to my table - I may offer 60-70% of market value depending on what I think I can sell it for. Some I may refer to auction history per CF in calibrating this. Many MS62 pieces I pass on, just simply to unattractive for me.

    Whether its a 10 dollar or 10,000 item it all adds up. I have done well retailing coins like VG Barber Halves from my online store.

    The only parameters I consider in gauging the market are silver, gold, platinum bullion prices and the PCGS 3000. I take dealer marketing letters with a grain of salt as I can see these as what they are - a promotional tool for their inventory. Not knocking it, used to have my own marketing letters at my table at shows.

    Technically I consider MS62 coins average uncirculated. Some can be attractive others ones I would want just blow out. I do not pursue these as a target for investment. In the Peace Dollar Series MS62 coins can be a good hole filler. My Peace Dollar Set has coins from VF20 to MS965 and there is nothing with filling the hole with a nice circ wehre the Gem super expensive.
    Coins & Currency
  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well, it certainly depends on the series. For some issues, an MS62 is an awful coin, the nice coins with presidents on them start at 65 or 66.



    Other coins, such as ones that the date starts with 17-, an MS62 is a spectacularly nice coin.

    On the other hand, no matter what, "purty" is a really stupid way to spell a word. image

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • msch1manmsch1man Posts: 809 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: DIMEMAN

    62 is like any other grade......there are great ones and awful ones.




    100% agree with this.



    My favorite 62 that I currently own (purchased from and photographed by forum member mercurydimeguy)...

    image



  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,619 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I only own one 62.



    It is a 1920-S purchased 11 years ago and I don't regret it for a moment.



    It looks better than a lot of 64s I've seen.



    Someday, when I get around to it; I'll have it re-graded.



    But in the meantime; I am in no hurry, as I really love the coin and don't care what the paper insert says.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • bolivarshagnastybolivarshagnasty Posts: 7,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just sent this one in for regrade. Went up from 61 to 62.



    imageimage
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,844 ✭✭✭✭✭
    These don't suck:



    image



    image
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,334 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • JJSingletonJJSingleton Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yep, when I reel in a 62 I always throw them back.image



    pop 2/0

    image

    Joseph J. Singleton - First Superintendent of the U.S. Branch Mint in Dahlonega Georgia

    Findley Ridge Collection
    About Findley Ridge

  • GazesGazes Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭✭✭
    JJ Singleton--beautiful half eagle. Enjoyed reading about your type set.
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,334 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lovely 39-D!
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    More MS62's. Love them.

    Lance.



    imageimage

    imageimage

    imageimage

    imageimage

    imageimage

    imageimage
  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sometimes an MS62 coin is an otherwise MS66 quality piece that is hacked up with bagmarks so heavy that you'd swear some of them come through to the other side.

    Other times, an MS62 coin is a mark-free slider AU58 that is just too nice to be graded AU58 by modern standards.

    I think many of us seek out the latter type of MS62 and shun the former.
  • etexmikeetexmike Posts: 6,850 ✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: DIMEMAN

    62 is like any other grade......there are great ones and awful ones.




    There are some great examples out there to be had in all denoms.





    Mike

  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think 62s come from bad commutes for the graders.

    When the traffic is light, they can get to 63 or higher. image
  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
    All this angst is over a nicely toned example that is baggy.

    Looking at the coin, I can't understand how so many marks could hit it without some wear on the devices.



  • GeorgeKelloggGeorgeKellogg Posts: 1,251 ✭✭
    Originally posted by: JJSingleton
    Yep, when I reel in a 62 I always throw them back.image

    pop 2/0
    image


    As JJ's tongue-in-cheek answer implies, it depends upon the series. The question has a vastly different connotation to Morgan Dollar collectors, for example, than it does to Dahlonega specialists.

    image
    The images of my 1861-D Half Eagle are courtesy of BluCC Photos.
    "Clamorous for Coin"
  • ranshdowranshdow Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭✭
    My only 62
    image
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,608 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: rhedden

    Sometimes an MS62 coin is an otherwise MS66 quality piece that is hacked up with bagmarks so heavy that you'd swear some of them come through to the other side.



    Other times, an MS62 coin is a mark-free slider AU58 that is just too nice to be graded AU58 by modern standards.



    I think many of us seek out the latter type of MS62 and shun the former.




    Agree with this. Some MS62's are attractive and some are ugly. Depends on the coin. Also, sometimes the next higher grade of MS63 is worth multiples of what a MS62 is worth which means a decent looking high end MS62 might be a great coin to purchase and a great value.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Okay, time for a committee to deal with everyone who ever says, "Depends on the coin."



    Maybe some island where they could be confined with the "Buy the coin, not the holder" tribespeople.



    Hard to find an island big enough. Maybe Madagascar. image
  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,023 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have a few 62 pieces that I love quite a bit. No room for hate in the hobby.
    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • EastonCollectionEastonCollection Posts: 1,471 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ok - I too love the 62 grade - there are some very nice 62s and some ugly 62s - this issue exists with all grades.

    Below is a pcgs 62 that I acquired and I thought it was undergraded so I sent it in for a regrade and it came back as a 64. SO i guess its not a 62!

    image
    Easton Collection
  • dogwooddogwood Posts: 1,935 ✭✭✭✭
    62's aren't terrible. The ones posted so far are quite nice indeed. I can post the only one I own, and I think it holds up well.

    image

    image
    We're all born MS70. I'm about a Fine 15 right now.
  • IrishMikeyIrishMikey Posts: 1,561 ✭✭✭
    $10 and $20 Liberties in MS-62 are often very attractive coins, and the common dates can be had for a small premium over melt. It helps to check them out first...
  • LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,544 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image
    image
    I am fine with mine as a 62 image
  • brg5658brg5658 Posts: 2,399 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I usually don't mind MS62 coins. But, MS61 and MS60 are often the kiss of death (i.e., dogs).



    image
    -Brandon
    -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
    My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins]
    -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,953 ✭✭✭✭✭
    There are nice 62's and there are dogs, just as there are in 65.
  • stevebensteveben Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭✭✭
    some of my favorite coins are ms62:



    image



    image



    image
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,166 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I love my MS62

    image
  • david3142david3142 Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Um, I think TDN wins.



    There are some great coins above although many were pretty clearly under graded, so it isn't as fair to embrace the 62 grade if it really is a 63+ coin. (I think the graders must have been having a really bad day when they looked at that 1859 Half Eagle.)



    As others have said, it greatly depends on the series. Capped Bust coins have a much blurrier distinction between AU and Unc, so 62s are often quite nice. Morgans in the same grade tend to be ugly, but some have other attributes that make them attractive.



    I currently own 9 slabbed 62s and a few more raw ones that would probably make that grade. Some of them look like a 62 but I nonetheless enjoy owning (such as these)



    image



    image



    and some I believe were undergraded:



    image



    image
  • deefree49deefree49 Posts: 282 ✭✭✭
    Sorry not to have a picture but I have a 61 that is one of my favorite coins! Lincoln 1916-D 61BN. Honestly it is actually graded wrong. In reality it is probably a 63 or 64. Still a 62 can be nice. It depends where the marks are or if the graders were having a bad day. None of the coins I own are absolute numbers really. They could all go up or down at least a + or 1 grade.



    If YOU like the 62, by all means get it, enjoy it and don't pay a lot of attention to the number. Instead, look at the COIN!
    Lincoln coin lover, especially Matte Proofs
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,844 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This coin graded MS62, twice! I submitted it once thinking it to be an MS65 coin. It came back MS62 so I showed it around at the ANA. Several smart folks saw it the same way I did. I cracked it out a couple years later and sent it back in to fill out my "free" eight yearly submissions. Same result. After that, I spent a little time with it and could see that there really was just a bit of rub - technically an AU58, net graded up for its other qualities (like it matters for this common date). It's easiest to see on the breast. I gained a bit of respect for the grading room guys who do this day in and day out. Very few people would have complained if it was in an MS65 holder.



    image
  • DarkStarDarkStar Posts: 460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My 62s. These aren't the worst coins ever, I think.



    image



    image



    image



    There are 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who do not.

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great coins in this thread! image
  • ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭✭✭
    In what I have seen and collect, I avoid the grade.



    Many open collar coins, like Capped Bust Halves, I see what I think are high end AU coins in MS 62 holders. I don't think you're going to get it right all of the time, distinguishing between slight wear and a coin which is not fully struck (with open collar coins), by looking at them for only a few seconds.



    I have yet to hold in hand an MS 62 Morgan which I thought was an attractive coin.



    I did see an 1810 Classic Large Cent in MS 62. The coin was Unc. all day long, but it was lifeless and to me, not attractive.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • cheezhedcheezhed Posts: 5,948 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What a wonderful thread with some fantastic 62's!
    Many happy BST transactions
  • BUFFNIXXBUFFNIXX Posts: 2,723 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I just picked up a 1914 buffalo nickel, matte proof pf62 and for the life of me it looks like a 64. So, it depends on the coin.
    Some 62's can be really nice.
    Collector of Buffalo Nickels and other 20th century United States Coinage
    a.k.a "The BUFFINATOR"
  • MonsterCoinzMonsterCoinz Posts: 1,518 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I used to own this 62. It was very lustrous. Wish I had it back.



    image
    www.MonsterCoinz.com | My Toned Showcase

    Check out my iPhone app SlabReader!
  • JJSingletonJJSingleton Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    And another 62 I hooked that needs to be thrown back.image



    huh...Green Pond / Bass. Get it? image



    image

    Joseph J. Singleton - First Superintendent of the U.S. Branch Mint in Dahlonega Georgia

    Findley Ridge Collection
    About Findley Ridge

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file