Home U.S. Coin Forum

Fingerprints

ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,974 ✭✭✭✭✭
There was a post about a fingerprint on a coin which got me thinking. I have an Indian cent that has a fingerprint which I find to be attractive. Does any one else have a coin with a print they find attractive? Also what are your thoughts about the print on this coin? Good or bad.



image



image



Comments

  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very different and intriguing! Color, pattern, placement. I like it.

    Lance.
  • mbogomanmbogoman Posts: 5,223 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It looks like some indigenous Amazonian Indian with face painted to blend in with the dappled light of the rainforest! Very cool IMO!!!
  • david3142david3142 Posts: 3,584 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm not a fan of the fingerprint on that coin but the rest of it is outstanding! Some of the prettiest color I've seen on an IHC.
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,850 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Much less distracting than most but still not a positive thing. Neutral overall effect, at best.
  • DCWDCW Posts: 7,567 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not for me. There's nothing I wince at more than a pronounced fingerprint on a otherwise flawless coin

    Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
    "Coin collecting for outcasts..."

  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,521 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have never cared for them. In that case it looks like you got two finger prints for the price of one.
    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,685 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It would be a pass for me, but if you like it, then who am I to tell you what to buy?

    The best thing I can say about a fingerprint on a coin is, "It doesn't bother me too much." I own one or two of those, but only on hard to find coins.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • SamByrdSamByrd Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭✭
    it is all perception of course.

    sometimes really bad

    image

    sometimes not so bad

    image

    image
  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,495 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree, sometimes awful, sometimes not so awful, and sometimes attractive. I'll offer this

    Indian Head Cent as in the sometimes attractive column. The lighter more contrasted the photo the more the fingerprint shows up.

    Jim



    image



    image

    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • howardshowards Posts: 1,241 ✭✭✭
    I'm sure somewhere there is a fingerprint collector.



    But not me.
  • Bigbuck1975Bigbuck1975 Posts: 1,276 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would have bought that coin if it didn't have the print. I am guessing that is the reason it hasn't sold yet.
  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,974 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for all the opinions! Before I saw this coin I would not even look at a coin with a print. This coin was different and I instantly liked it! I would much rather it did not have the print but I took it the way it was. The coin grades MS 62 BN by NGC and did not cross to PCGS. I think it is way under graded probably a net grade for the print. Does PCGS consider a coin with a print altered or do you think something else kept if from crossing? The photo is true to the coins look.
  • SamByrdSamByrd Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭✭
    In all honesty I rather like the coin in the OP. image
  • stevebensteveben Posts: 4,628 ✭✭✭✭✭
    i like the indian that is your avatar much better.
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,850 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: ironmanl63

    I think it is way under graded probably a net grade for the print.




    I guess you are saying that the technical grade (luster, surfaces, strike) of the coin is likely higher than the overall grade, which is likely true. Eye appeal, however, is a VERY important part of the overall grade, and in this case I think the majority of professional graders would view this massive obverse fingerprint as a significant distraction.



    Maybe it's semantics, but I think the overall grade is probably fair.



    Net grading, in my mind, is different..... something done to account for negatives not otherwise addressed by the usual grading categories of strike, luster, surface preservation, and eye appeal. To me, this would be a coin with a tiny patch of cleaning, a small well-hidden scratch, carbon spots, a small area of corrosion, a hint of rub, or a minute planchet defect. These issues would usually produce a "no-grade" but there is lower limit at which some can be accommodated by a grade adjustment.
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: ironmanl63

    Thanks for all the opinions! Before I saw this coin I would not even look at a coin with a print. This coin was different and I instantly liked it! I would much rather it did not have the print but I took it the way it was. The coin grades MS 62 BN by NGC and did not cross to PCGS. I think it is way under graded probably a net grade for the print. Does PCGS consider a coin with a print altered or do you think something else kept if from crossing? The photo is true to the coins look.




    PCGS does not bodybag for fingerprints. Shoot, I have an early branch mint Lincoln they graded 65RD and it has an enormous, prominent print. I was so sure PCGS would downgrade it that I let the ebay seller off easy and sent it in for a guarantee review instead of returning it.



    DW wrote to me and said he passed it around the grading room and the consensus was it was good enough for 65RD. Damn. I still have that coin.



    Back to topic: PCGS often adjusts grade to account for the likely market value. So either PCGS didn't feel it was worth 62 money or there were suspicions about the color (or some other matter).



    The only way to know for sure is to try a cross at any grade. If you get a DNC then you know PCGS won't straight-grade it. If it grades without problem you'll get their opinion on the market grade.



    FWIW, the coin is too colorful to take a chance with a crack-out. Don't.

    Lance.
  • rte592rte592 Posts: 1,857 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I had a conversation with a seasoned collector about a slabbed MS67 coin I was considering with a finger print.

    His answer/question always came back around to IT has a finger print therefore its circulated.

    Circulated coins don't grade MS67.





    Always wondered how much of a dollar knock a graded MS67 with a print would be.













  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I do not like fingerprints on coins.... ever. Cheers, RickO
  • SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Fingerprints are ALWAYS bad.
  • mercurydimeguymercurydimeguy Posts: 4,625 ✭✭✭✭
    Here's one to pitch in, but It's a world coin though.



    image
  • COINS MAKE CENTSCOINS MAKE CENTS Posts: 1,861 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow that's a pretty indian head
    New inventory added daily at Coins Make Cents
    HAPPY COLLECTING


  • ms70ms70 Posts: 13,956 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: ricko

    I do not like fingerprints on coins.... ever. Cheers, RickO




    This....



    But what would be interesting is having access to the national Automated Fingerprint Identification System and run the prints to see who they belong to. Naturally it can't be done without good reason but that sure would be fun. image

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Personally, I'd like to pull his thumbs off.

    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • mariner67mariner67 Posts: 2,746 ✭✭✭
    To me all fingerprints are a "violation" of a coin.
    The first thing that comes to my mind is always "fingerprint" rather than any other aspect of the coin.
    Successful trades/buys/sells with gdavis70, adriana, wondercoin, Weiss, nibanny, IrishMike, commoncents05, pf70collector, kyleknap, barefootjuan, coindeuce, WhiteTornado, Nefprollc, ajw, JamesM, PCcoins, slinc, coindudeonebay,beernuts, and many more
  • robecrobec Posts: 6,812 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Got 'em on both sides of the coin



    image
  • This content has been removed.
  • AmazonXAmazonX Posts: 680 ✭✭✭✭
    Sometimes they can be good, sometimes they can be bad. It depends on the coin, really.
  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,236 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They can be tolerated but never loved.
    theknowitalltroll;
  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Almost like them about as much as a scratch. Got to really stretch to tolerate them in my collection.



    Had a few coins sneak in but was always on the lookout for a replacement.



    image
  • drei3reedrei3ree Posts: 3,430 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: ms70
    Originally posted by: ricko
    I do not like fingerprints on coins.... ever. Cheers, RickO


    This....

    But what would be interesting is having access to the national Automated Fingerprint Identification System and run the prints to see who they belong to. Naturally it can't be done without good reason but that sure would be fun. image


    +1

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file