Does this holder look OK?

Bigbuck1975

The reason I ask is the cert number comes up as a PF62

[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/bigbuck1975/media/Mobile Uploads/image_zps3uyzltjz.jpeg.html][/URL]

[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/bigbuck1975/media/Mobile Uploads/image_zps6mft6g4b.jpeg.html][/URL]

AUandAG

Looks okay to my eyes. Don't ya just love those dot matrix days???



Far better than punch cards.... uh, don't date yourself AUandAG





bob





Oh and call PCGS on Monday and see if sending a pic can correct the problem....

Boosibri

Simple data entry error

Bigbuck1975

I wish all 63s looked like this

[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/bigbuck1975/media/Mobile Uploads/image_zpsnurhuyfy.jpeg.html][/URL]

[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/bigbuck1975/media/Mobile Uploads/image_zpsqp3mcuup.jpeg.html][/URL]

Flatwoods

That looks like a nice coin.

TopographicOceans

Nice coin and nice clear plastic.

It looks like you're the first person that checked the cert number this century.

lkeigwin

Email PCGS with the photo and I'm sure they'll fix their database.



You can fix your image display problem easily at Photobucket. Go to settings/albums and uncheck the "link back to albums" box. That will do away with the extraneous html text and left-justify your images.

Lance.

Bigbuck1975

Thanks Lance.

Thoughts on looking for an upgrade on this? Or shoot for gold CAC?

ricko

That is a really nice looking 63....could even be a 64.... Cheers, RickO

lkeigwin

This is ideal for the "reconsideration" service and why it was created (assuming you would like to keep the coin in its rattler if it won't upgrade, of course).



If you don't care about the rattler go for a "regrade". Graders will see the coin raw so they don't have to be conservative. You'll get it back in a new holder (they're the best ever). And there's no premium for an upgrade.

Lance.