Home U.S. Coin Forum

With respect to your "primary set", the one you're working hardest to complete...

MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,362 ✭✭✭✭✭
With an unlimited budget, respect for money, and your current level of effort in building the set, how long would it take you to complete the task to your satisfaction?

Details, please.

And FWIW, I ask because I worry that it has become so easy to collect some things that, for many of us, collecting has become less of a way to spend time and more of a way to spend money. And I don't consider that healthy for the hobby.

Andy Lustig

Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.

Comments

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,607 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My type set is finished for the most part. There are a couple of coins I'd like to upgrade, but rarity and extreme expense will probably preclude that.


    Other sets? I finished the Type I and Type II gold dollars. The Type III's go on forever and some like the 1861-D cost a fortune. Then there are sleepers like the 1856-D. I'd like to get really nice set of these coins from the 1880s, but grade-flation has pushed the MS-65 graded pieces up to MS-67.


    Beyond that I'm thinking about the Classic Head Quarter eagles (1834 to 1839). I have all but one of the big keys. The one I'm lacking is the 1839-C. If I find that I'll probably finish the set.


    Beyond that I'm working on my "dark side" set - one coin for each British king. I've got six more coins left to have the set from William the Conquerer to Elizabeth II. Plus I'd like a Harold II, the guy who lost to William the Conqerer, but he's expesive.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • MrHalfDimeMrHalfDime Posts: 3,440 ✭✭✭✭
    "... collecting has become less of a way to spend time and more of a way to spend money. And I don't consider that healthy for the hobby."

    I think you have struck on something significant here. The 'thrill of the hunt' is all but removed from the hobby with the advent and wide use of the internet. Whatever you want or need is immediately available with just a little searching of a few dealer's websites, save for a few rarities, and even these can be found with just a little searching. All that remains is to pony up the funds for the purchase. It took me nearly two decades to complete a Capped Bust half dime collection, with all known die marriages, in AU grade. This was done through a combination of in depth education, networking with others in the hobby of like interests, and earnest, long-term searching at coin shows. But others have more recently accomplished nearly the same goal with the advent of the internet.
    They that can give up essential Liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither Liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
  • TopographicOceansTopographicOceans Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: MrEureka
    ...collecting has become less of a way to spend time and more of a way to spend money. And I don't consider that healthy for the hobby.

    That's why I stopped playing the Registry game.
    I already know other people have more money than I do

  • SonorandesertratSonorandesertrat Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: MrEureka
    ....And FWIW, I ask because I worry that it has become so easy to collect some things that, for many of us, collecting has become less of a way to spend time and more of a way to spend money. And I don't consider that healthy for the hobby.



    As you know, that horse left the barn more than 40 years ago. Without investors, the business end of the hobby would be a fraction of what it is today. Would there be $1M+ coins today if buyers had no/little concern about getting their money back when they are sold? I don't think so, outside of a few coins of genuine historic import. What has changed is faster information flow---this is leveling the playing field between collectors and dealers, to the financial detriment of the latter. Of course, this also makes it easier for buyers to spend their money.
    Member: EAC, NBS, C4, CWTS, ANA

    RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'

    CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,177 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: MrEureka

    With an unlimited budget, respect for money, and your current level of effort in building the set, how long would it take you to complete the task to your satisfaction?


    The definition of "to my satisfaction" changes as does budget, and thus would also the scope of the task needing completion.



    Right now, the only set I'm almost "finished" with is my 1723-1951 prime number set. I have an idea of what I want to use for 1753, and now I have to find it. An unlimited budget won't make coins any more available or attractive, but it will expand what I could consider for this coin. The thing is, I'd probably start tweaking the set after finishing it -- expanding it further or changing the composition.



    If I look at my Morgan Dollar set, that would be easier to just order and be done with, given unlimited money, but not if I want to find the perfect coins for me for the set. That would take more searching and discernment.



  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Complete a set = easy.



    Complete a set with strong examples of each issue at a fair price point = difficult, and perhaps impossible prior to the Information Age.



    Things change yes, some good, some bad.
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,472 ✭✭✭✭✭
    There are a few people antsy about getting their Nixon dollar. Honestly. I wouldn't lie. It's their primary focus.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,607 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: MrHalfDime
    "... collecting has become less of a way to spend time and more of a way to spend money. And I don't consider that healthy for the hobby."

    I think you have struck on something significant here. The 'thrill of the hunt' is all but removed from the hobby with the advent and wide use of the internet. Whatever you want or need is immediately available with just a little searching of a few dealer's websites, save for a few rarities, and even these can be found with just a little searching. All that remains is to pony up the funds for the purchase. It took me nearly two decades to complete a Capped Bust half dime collection, with all known die marriages, in AU grade. This was done through a combination of in depth education, networking with others in the hobby of like interests, and earnest, long-term searching at coin shows. But others have more recently accomplished nearly the same goal with the advent of the internet.

    I don't think it is quite that easy. Sure you can find were something is offered for sale, but is it properly graded? Is the price fair? "The hunt" keeps going because of those factors. I've used the Internet to find coins at a major show, but after I've seen them, the hunt has sometimes continued.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • ebaybuyerebaybuyer Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭
    the thrill of the hunt is alive and well in my endeavor, my date set of contemporary counterfeit seated quarters will never be finished as im continually locating unknown pieces, some of which may be unique or nearly so, valueless to most collectors, the thrill of locating one ive never seen is why I do it.
    regardless of how many posts I have, I don't consider myself an "expert" at anything
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,607 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I can say the same thing about 19th century presidential campaign pieces as your counterfeit quarters. My collection contains close to 600 pieces. A collection that was recently stolen had 1,000 items in it. The set will never be "complete" and the quest will not end until I decide to sell it all.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • JeffMTampaJeffMTampa Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm a Barber Half Collector and like the 58's. Try and complete that set in Au 58; it's only been done once (that I know of). Many of the dates have a Pop. less than 10 in a 58 grade; cash doesn't help when there are so few coins out there.
    I love them Barber Halves.....
  • mirabelamirabela Posts: 5,087 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Good question, especially since we often determine the project based on what kind of funds are available. If my funding situation suddenly changed but my definition of the primary set did not, then, no it wouldn't be hard and I wouldn't have to take much time. I could probably finish it this month.
    mirabela
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,607 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: Hydrant
    Bill, truly sorry to hear about your loss. Devestating.


    NO, NO

    That was not MY set. It was another one that had over 1,000 pieces in it. Mine is only 60% of that size in sheen numbers, not value.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • sellitstoresellitstore Posts: 3,053 ✭✭✭✭✭
    And FWIW, I ask because I worry that it has become so easy to collect some things that, for many of us, collecting has become less of a way to spend time and more of a way to spend money. And I don't consider that healthy for the hobby.

    Yes, when it becomes too easy to collect something, it's hard to maintain an interest in it.

    I recognize that my collection of obsolete currency will never be complete because nobody has any idea of what a complete collection is. Although there are reasonably complete records for the thousands of different bank notes issued, the records for the tens of thousands of different scrip issues are a lot less complete, so discoveries of new issues, denominations and issuers are fairly commonplace.

    Tokens and medals of various types also offer the collector opportunities to form collections that have no defined end because new ones are always being discovered. There's a wealth of interesting history and stories behind the issuers of these items to be discovered through the internet, with new information constantly being added.

    It may be hard to readjust one's thinking towards collecting something but never completing a set but antique and art collectors do it all the time.

    Always having something else to look for and research helps keep collectors interested.
    Collector and dealer in obsolete currency. Always buying all obsolete bank notes and scrip.
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,335 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't espouse the typical set collector. My grouping of no motto half eagles is all about the look rather than putting together a specific set. I enjoy the freedom to hunt and add what I find to be exceptional rather than begin constrained by any predefined format.
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My primary set will likely never be complete which is part of why it continues to be interesting.

    If it was simply a matter of spending money, I'd probably just spend my time making more money.
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    There are 453 capped bust die marriages, with at least 4 R8's and 6 R7's.



    I have around half the die marriages but will never complete the set, no matter how much money or time I devote.



    And I love the pursuit.

    Lance.
  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Everyman Merc’s don't to seem to be findable sometimes.
  • Desert MoonDesert Moon Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: BillJones


    Beyond that I'm thinking about the Classic Head Quarter eagles (1834 to 1839). I have all but one of the big keys. The one I'm lacking is the 1839-C. If I find that I'll probably finish the set.





    Bill, here is a 39-C, but maybe not high enough grade? No matter, I'm keeping it. image



    Best, SH


    image

    My online coin store - https://desertmoonnm.com/
  • deefree49deefree49 Posts: 282 ✭✭✭
    I agree that your desires can be fulfilled much quicker now with the internet than it used to be. If you have lots of money, it is all there for the grabbing. When I first collected coins, it was several years before I even SAW a 1909-S VDB penny in person. Not every coin store around where I lived even had one! Now you can go on eBay and buy a dozen if you got the money.



    As far as my own meager collecting, I'd like to eventually finish my Lincoln Matte Proof set...only 9 coins! I still haven't finished it and the final coin will put a severe dent in my "coin money".

    I will be darn happy when that small goal is accomplished!
    Lincoln coin lover, especially Matte Proofs
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,335 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lovely 1839-c
  • breakdownbreakdown Posts: 2,220 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well my OCD requires that I collect sets. I do envy the free style ability of a collector like Boosibri. At this point having completed my Walkers, I am only actively building my Date Set Seated Halves. I am picky and only buy when I feel financially able to do so (which is not all the time).

    Ideally, I would say that it would take 10-20 years to complete a truly fine set. My Walker Set took me about ten years although I started collecting Walkers many years before that. And to be fair, my main focus on the Walkers was 1916-1933.

    "Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,851 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My not ever complete my set to my satisfaction.



    I'm working on a CC Morgan lowball set. Currently I only have one PO01. One AG3 and the rest FA2's. I am missing the 85cc in 2 or 1 if I could ever find one. The AG3 is the 81cc and there are 2's out there so I have hope.



    Getting to poor ones for the entire set would require many more years than I have left as I would likely have to carry them to wear them down that low!



    My set is: boblindstrom on the registry



    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,759 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The fact that most coins are more easily found today is the product of technology. One can argue that sets that used to take years to complete lost many collectors feeling that they would not have the time to ever complete the set and given up.

    Yes with unlimited funds one can complete and entire MS or PR set of morgans today. However the quality of the set could probably not be done in the same time frame and a true collector looking for quality will spend the time looking for a coin with just the right look for their set. In fact, knowing that they can now view 10,000's of coins on an almost immediate basis should make the buyer even more quality and "look" particular as he knows he can reach more avenues then used to.

    The avenue has changed but the determined collector has stayed the same
    may the fonz be with you...always...
  • mercurydimeguymercurydimeguy Posts: 4,625 ✭✭✭✭
    Unlike art, or other collectibles where some pieces are unique, very few numismatic items are unique. Therefore, more often then not, in numismatics it does just come down to money!



    Sure one can get very esoteric and look for die marriages, etc., but that is not mainstream collecting and these types of "niche" items might not have similar kind of liquidity.



    Having money as a constraint changes everything...I can go out today and purchase the finest known of about 1/2 of my set, and significantly upgrade the quality. But since I don't have unlimited funds, I cannot do that.



    In fact there was a BG-712 Cal Frac that just closed on Heritage last night. PCGS MS67, finest known, $3.1k. I loved it, it is a more scarce date, and one of the 5 remaining Cal Fracs that I need to complete my 1869 set. But I don't have that kind of money to plop down on that coin, so I need to hold out and wait and try to find a more affordable example. I would have loved to have won it last night, but showed restrain and will continue looking for a piece I can afford.



    Sorry, from where I sit -- and I might be on a numismatic island cause I've been doing this forever -- building sets or collecting coins in general simply comes down to $$. It is the only true single limiting factor. No one hangs on to something forever, and when enough money is offered for it, the owner of even something unique will eventually part with it.



    The one thing that makes numismatics fun for mainstream collectors is lack of resources, which makes the chase/hunt more difficult and interesting. I suspect if $$ is eliminated as a barrier, numismatics just becomes another form of entertainment or another form of investment.



    Just my 10 cents.

  • RayboRaybo Posts: 5,335 ✭✭✭✭✭
    OK.......I think my Walkers are finally close to being "finished", but my real passion is (laugh all you want my fellow forum members) getting my 2 cent pieces up to my standards.
    I love copper!
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,620 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Even though I am closer to the end of my Walker journey; I still know that it will take some time.



    Even with unlimited funds----the last three early dates, as well as the 34-S, 35-S & 36-S are still quite CHALLENGING.



    The coins of the 1940s (especially the S coins) aren't especially costly or difficult but they still require some PATIENCE to find really nice examples.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • jcpingjcping Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭
    I am working on a set that no one ever completed, the calfracs needs almost 600 coins (period one and period two with denomination) with est. 32 varieties are unique and 36 varieties are R8 (aka 2-3 known). With a few un-published varieties were out there (almost all are unique now), I doubt anyone could ever complete this set even money is not an issue.

    Making the set more interesting here, Period two charms are linked to period two calfracs since many were shared the same obverse dies and I don't know who has a complete list of them.

    In short, I will continue working on this set as long as my financial allows me to do so. Unfortunately, I will never complete it. Could I be the first person making 90% completion? Time will tell image
    an SLQ and Ike dollars lover
  • oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,474 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My 7070 is continually being up and down graded.
    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • TigersFan2TigersFan2 Posts: 1,442 ✭✭
    Originally posted by: MrEureka
    With an unlimited budget, respect for money, and your current level of effort in building the set, how long would it take you to complete the task to your satisfaction?

    With an unlimited budget, I'd simply seek to purchase every PCGS coin off of Ebay, other auction sites and dealer sites with the intention of trying to corner the PCGS coin market and own every coin in a PCGS holder.

    But then again, with an unlimited budget, that would get tiring very quickly. Actually, if I had an unlimited budget and could buy any coin I wanted, the hobby and a lot in life would become uninteresting. Much of the interest in collecting is making decisions within a budget and not having an unlimited budget. With an unlimited budget, money becomes of little importance and looking for a bargain becomes pointless.

    But, if I had an unlimited budget, I might prefer to use it to run for president or buy my very own Taco Bell restaurant.

    I love the 3 P's: PB&J, PBR and PCGS.
  • msch1manmsch1man Posts: 809 ✭✭✭✭
    Very interesting question that I've pondered for quite some time today. I'd say my "primary set" is my colonial type set...roughly defined as the 'Early American Coins and Tokens Basic Design Set (1616-1820)' by PCGS in their set registry...though I've thrown in a few extras I'd like to have for 'my' set.



    Even with an unlimited budget, I still think I'd go for an entirely circulated set to keep uniformity (though it would obviously gravitate much more towards choice AU pieces where available). I think (and would hope) that along with an increased budget would come increased standards. If I kept high standards, I still think this set would take 5 to 10 years to complete. There just aren't that many colonials that come to market that are well struck, well centered, and have good color/planchet quality with overall eye appeal. In fact, I looked and even with an unlimited budget there are only 2 coins that I would absolutely, no question buy today to add to my set, with possibly a 3rd that I would need to think about.



    I'd love to have a windfall and be able to answer this question from experience someday!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file