Whoops, nevermind, didn't see that 'plus' -- I have none, though I made a few 58's eleven or twelve years back that would surely warrant it. One FH SLQ in particular comes to mind. Oh well.
I happen to think that we will start seeing significant increase in AU58+ coins versus MS61/62 coins coming out of TPG's as essentially AU58+ will become a catch-all for the old "too nice for a 58" conundrum, that culminated with 10's of thousands of AU coins in MS61/62 holders...
And it wouldn't surprise me if the cost-spread counterintuitively narrowed between AU58+ and MS62, as I suspect people would opt to pay more $$ for the PQ AU58+ coins rather than hacked up/unattractive MS62 UNCs.
So I broke the rules...Grading is subjective or something like that.
Brian, I hear you...
One of the challenges of collecting for a long time/or one series/or avidly or all of the above, is that you/me/we all tend to see a lot of coins and inadvertently rank them (practically speaking) within their own realm. I don't know about you, but I fall into this trap frequently and have to remind myself to not go there...
I ultimately believe more in coin ranking than coin grading and would immediately switch over to that methodology if it was offered by a TPG.
So I broke the rules...Grading is subjective or something like that.
Those surfaces are mauled. 55 is correct.
Disagree. It is a proof like coin. It came from the greatest type set (Jimmy Hayes) and the greatest No Motto half eagle set (Milas). Consider there are 40-50 known in all grades and this coin is about #4 in the condition census. You can find the write-up of this particular coin and issue here:
Originally posted by: Boosibri So I broke the rules...Grading is subjective or something like that.
Those surfaces are mauled. 55 is correct.
Disagree. It is a proof like coin. It came from the greatest type set (Jimmy Hayes) and the greatest No Motto half eagle set (Milas). Consider there are 40-50 known in all grades and this coin is about #4 in the condition census. You can find the write-up of this particular coin and issue here:
This 1839-O quarter eagle should be in an AU-58+ holder, but it's in an Old Green Label (OGH) before PCGS was giving "+" signs. The coin is nicer than a lot of MS-62 coins I've seen.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Comments
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
siliconvalleycoins.com
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/gold/liberty-head-2-1-gold-major-sets/liberty-head-2-1-gold-basic-set-circulation-strikes-1840-1907-cac/alltimeset/268163
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
Lance.
Had a B+ coin once
Those are deserving of a plus
l
It's not having what you want, it's wanting what you've got.
There is ONE at Collectorscorner 1920-S Saint Gaudens PCGS AU58+ ...and it's CAC approved as well.
There are some at Collectors.com although some are duplicates, ebay items listed in conjunction with storefront sales.
Incredible Busties lkeigwin & Rich! The old gold and seated series as well!
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
And it wouldn't surprise me if the cost-spread counterintuitively narrowed between AU58+ and MS62, as I suspect people would opt to pay more $$ for the PQ AU58+ coins rather than hacked up/unattractive MS62 UNCs.
Just my 10 cents
Latin American Collection
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
Latin American Collection
So I broke the rules...Grading is subjective or something like that.
Brian, I hear you...
One of the challenges of collecting for a long time/or one series/or avidly or all of the above, is that you/me/we all tend to see a lot of coins and inadvertently rank them (practically speaking) within their own realm. I don't know about you, but I fall into this trap frequently and have to remind myself to not go there...
I ultimately believe more in coin ranking than coin grading and would immediately switch over to that methodology if it was offered by a TPG.
As mentioned above, there are not a whole lotta AU58+ coins out there...your gold piece fits right in!
Birds of a feather...
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
10-4,
My Instagram picturesErik
My registry sets
that would be most of them IMO
Wowee ! ??
I give away money. I collect money.
I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.
So I broke the rules...Grading is subjective or something like that.
Those surfaces are mauled. 55 is correct.
No 1732 Cardinal?
Latin American Collection
So I broke the rules...Grading is subjective or something like that.
Those surfaces are mauled. 55 is correct.
Disagree. It is a proof like coin. It came from the greatest type set (Jimmy Hayes) and the greatest No Motto half eagle set (Milas). Consider there are 40-50 known in all grades and this coin is about #4 in the condition census. You can find the write-up of this particular coin and issue here:
DWN Link
Latin American Collection
So I broke the rules...Grading is subjective or something like that.
Those surfaces are mauled. 55 is correct.
Disagree. It is a proof like coin. It came from the greatest type set (Jimmy Hayes) and the greatest No Motto half eagle set (Milas). Consider there are 40-50 known in all grades and this coin is about #4 in the condition census. You can find the write-up of this particular coin and issue here:
DWN Link
Its a beautiful coin. That is not in question. But that doesn't change its technical merits. If I'm wrong, so is NGC and so is CAC.
No 1732 Cardinal?
I know...right? I have to say that I was really bummed out when the Choice Unc 1732 8R and 4R pair was withdrawn from Heritage's recent sale!
This is a nice tribute. But to be honest, I've seen some 58+'s that made me shake my head.
Lance.
if you ever host a photography class, let me know as myself and several others need attend. including some that charge for their services
one of the best diffusers around.
soft, even, lustrous with minimal hot spots while being accurate.
just some minor dark areas but that is a quick fix. besides, whom wants perfection.
.
Sunshine Rare Coins
sunshinecoins.com/store/c1/Featured_Products.html
There is just something about the big date numbers on the 1858 that gets my juices flowing!
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"