Home U.S. Coin Forum

Interesting seated liberty quarter

cccoinscccoins Posts: 291 ✭✭✭✭
Admittedly not the best looking example of this date / mint mark sub-type (technically the lowest ranked example, but still in the condition census :-) ). It's an interesting coin that I thought that I would never see or have the chance to own. This is the Hendrickson example that turned up in the mid 1990's, bringing the total known to five.





image



image

Comments

  • coindeucecoindeuce Posts: 13,490 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Congratulations ! the best opportunity most of us will ever have to own this date will have arrows at date. Even more rare than the 1876-CC Twenty Cents !

    "Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
    http://www.american-legacy-coins.com

  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,523 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've seen 4 of the 5 known examples, including this one. I've been looking for one since Joe Flynn advertised he would pay $1,000 for a Good in the 70's when the Redbook had it at $250.



    The late Jim O'Donnell, a great dealer and one of my mentors, owned two of the Uncirculated examples at the same time!



    Congratulations on owning one of the rarest coins in the U. S. Federal series!

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • TopographicOceansTopographicOceans Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭
    Wow - that's a cool coin to not only be able to see, but to actually own.
    image
  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I take it from the OP's user name that he is a CC specialist rather than a Seated quarter specialist (?). It's my opinion that CC specialists drive the market for all of the rare CC dates in this series (1870-cc, 1871-cc, 1872-cc, 1873-cc Arr., 1873-cc NA). If one looks at the top PCGS Registry sets in Seated quarters, they are mostly missing the rare CC mints.
  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I forgot to say "congrats" on winning this one!
  • cccoinscccoins Posts: 291 ✭✭✭✭
    Here is it's cousin, the 20c piece. It's interesting that they are both in details holders. However, sometimes it's the best you can do. I have heard people say that they would never have a details coin. I think that sometimes you have to take whats available, and if all you can afford is details, you take details. Thank you all for your kind words.



    image

    image

    P.S. I really like to look of the 20c in hand, even though it is scratched.

  • cccoinscccoins Posts: 291 ✭✭✭✭
    Yes, I specialize in Carson City. I have 93 of the 110 obtainable pieces including most of the keys. No plan for the 1873 CC No Arrows dime, unless someone discovers a scratch and dent sale example to match these two coins. :-)


    I will never be the Battle Born collector, but just a guy who has been blessed to be the custodian of some great pieces of history. My hope is to be able to complete a 110 piece set (out of 111) within my lifetime.

    Thank you all for your kind words.

  • The post title sure is a modest understatement. WOW, congrats!
  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow. I'm going to guess that cccoins is probably the only board member with both an 1873-CC NA quarter and an 1876-cc 20c piece, details grades and new board member or not. Anyone want to prove me wrong?



  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,523 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I looked for a circulated 1876-CC 20c piece since around 1984. First one I saw was the AU-58 that sold for $209,000 in 2009. That's 25 years during which no circulated 1876-CC 20 cent pieces hit auction.



    Congratulations on another amazing rarity!

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Definitely not what o expected when opening this thread. Congrats!
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks for showing that coin to us. I don't recall if I've seen it before. Would have expected to see any other seated quarter....except this date. Nice.



    It's great to meet such a dedicated enthusiast. It was probably the viewing of the gem 1873-cc NA quarter at the 1976 ANA (Bill Grayson's table) that helped kick my interest in seated coinage up a few notches. Bill paid a handsome $80K for that coin at the 1975 James Stack auction. If you compared price gains from other monster coins in that same sale today the 73cc NA would "have to be worth" around $4 MILL today. Being the finest known of a nearly unobtainable date doesn't appear to have worked out as well as being finest known of just a "rare" or "scarce" date.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow... thanks for sharing cccoins ... great acquisition...and congratulations on an awesome

    collection of CC coins...my favorite mint....Cheers, RickO
  • cccoinscccoins Posts: 291 ✭✭✭✭
    As I study more and more rare coins, pricing becomes a paradox. I agree that the 1873 cc no arrows 25c should be worth more than it is, just like the dime should be. It is a legitimate, regular issue, not a later restrike, or unauthorized mint issue. However, I agree that it might just be too rare.



    From my perspective, this exact coin was on my want list for some time, as it was the only reasonably affordable example. The other known examples are priced way out of my price range, whether priced at a fire sale discount or full retail. However, that being said, I could have been happy with my set even if I didn't have it. It just becomes icing on the cake.



    I believe that other collectors likely feel the same way. It also seems like the 1876 cc 20c is in the same price range, grade for grade, as the 1873 cc no arrows quarter. I believe that having 3x the available population for the 1876 cc 20c makes it more attainable, and thus more desirable. Both are exciting coins to own. I am stunned that this quarter found it's way to me, as I am sure that many others would have bought it had they had a chance.



    My plan in the short term is to cross it to PCGS, so that it will fit in my registry set, and then see if I can find a way to place it on public display for a period of time. Unfortunately, this cross over fees are substantial, and I am hoping to find a cost effective solution.

  • This content has been removed.
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: cccoins



    My plan in the short term is to cross it to PCGS, so that it will fit in my registry set, and then see if I can find a way to place it on public display for a period of time. Unfortunately, this cross over fees are substantial, and I am hoping to find a cost effective solution.




    Might be worth enlisting the aid of a top dealer to see what they could do for you to minimize the re-holdering expense.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
    ShaaaaaaaaaaZAM!



    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • cccoinscccoins Posts: 291 ✭✭✭✭
    Realone - Both were acquired from Allan Rowe at Northern Nevada, as were most of my coins.



    The 1873 25c was purchased 2 - 3 months ago, and I believe that it came from Silvertowne.



    The 1876 20c came came to me in early 2010. Here is what I know about it:



    ex. Wagner collection (Per label on the holder when I purchased it)


    ex. E. A. Carson (Bowers and Ruddy 6/24-25/1976, lot 72)


    ex. B. Frank (Stack's 11/23/1956, lot 622)


    ex. (Stack's auction 1937)



    I have a copy of the E. A. Carson catalog. I would love it if anyone had a copy of the auction catalog descriptions for the 1937 and 1956 auction appearances.

  • hchcoinhchcoin Posts: 4,835 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Awesome coins and awesome thread image
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,845 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow. Truly fantastic.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file