$10 Indian Head Gold Coin

I want to buy just one $10 Indian Head Gold.
My limit is about $1500.
If you were to purchase just one coin from this variety, then which would it be?
Thanks,
Chris Langdon
My limit is about $1500.
If you were to purchase just one coin from this variety, then which would it be?
Thanks,
Chris Langdon
0
Comments
Indian Head $10 Gold Date Set Album
I'd also look at examples at nearly 1/2 your budget on up as you might stumble across something nice.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
No Way Out: Stimulus and Money Printing Are the Only Path Left
<< <i>I'd go with a first year of issue 1907 N/M as it's always in demand by type collectors.
I'd also look at examples at nearly 1/2 your budget on up as you might stumble across something nice. >>
I think this is really solid advice. Plus, purely my personal preference, but I think the No Motto Indian is a slightly more attractive design.
However, the 07 N/M is a good choice too for the reasons mentioned below.
jom
The 1907 is of interest because it did not have the motto "In God we trust." That reflected Teddy Roosevelt's opinion that it was blasphemous to mention The Deity on a coin because it could be used for immoral purposes like gambling and prostitution. Congress overruled him on that one, and the motto was added to the design in 1908.
As a practical matter, strike quality of the 1907 No Motto piece varies. Many of them are not sharp, and the grading can vary because of that. You should also be careful of the 1932 double eagles. The grading on them can be loose. Given you budget, you should able to find a nice example in MS-63 for sure and perhaps MS-64. If the coin looks to be excessively marked up to you, pass.
Here are photos of the two types. This 1907 is graded MS-64 and would be out of your price range.
This 1932 is graded MS-63, and would be within your price range.
<< <i>The 1932 $10 Indian is an interesting coin because it is the only coin among the U.S. gold pieces that is affordable. >>
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>I like the 1911..... Be sure to show us what you finally acquire....Cheers, RickO >>
Go figure, Ricko likes "1911" (check his avatar)
Just noticed that the "U" in Unum is below the wing on the 1907 and on top of the wing on the 1932...may be one of the differences between No Motto verse With Motto.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
<< <i>
<< <i>The 1932 $10 Indian is an interesting coin because it is the only coin among the U.S. gold pieces that is affordable. >>
Sorry, I did not word that correctly.
It should be "The 1932 $10 Indian is an interesting coin because it is the only date amoung the U.S. pieces FROM THE 1930s that is affordable.
<< <i>I'd look for one in a Doily.
My YouTube Channel
siliconvalleycoins.com
I am not a huge fan of the No Motto 1907 and 1908 eagles for type collectors. The coins often do not come well struck, and selecting a nice one seems to be a minefield for both collectors and graders. Would you like to guess the grade of this one, which is still in my collection?
I know that some of you think that everything in an NGC holder is over graded.
This is in an MS-61 holder, and it's just as good in person as it is in these photos. I would not sell this one in the MS-61 holder, because that's like giving half or more of the coin away.
This is not the only example of this type that I have seen that I thought was under graded. This is the most obvious example I have ever seen, and for less than $500, I could not resist buying it and keeping it.
I have also seen some overgraded examples of this type.
<< <i>This collector is looking for a type coin that showcases the design. For that reason I would not buy an AU-58. Buy a carefully selected MS-64. >>
I once collected this series in MS64 from 07-16S then discovered AU58's that are all there.... A far greater challenge, but out there.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
<< <i>Buy one. Be happy. >>
Buy Two. Be Happier
This used to be the key to the series (excluding the 20-S and 33 meltdowns). A few dozen high grade examples showed up from a small hoard in Europe I believe about 40 years ago which has since
suppressed the overall prices. So its now a bit of a "sleeper". With patience, $1500 will get you a decent example.
<< <i>Although a lot of folks don't like the more common dates. I went with this one a while back. Has a deeper orange color in person. And the OGH (L@@K) is pristine.
>>
I wouldn't care what the date was if it looked like that!
OP:
I got a 1913 in a 62 holder, I picked it because I liked the date and it is a lower mintage coin, and it also looked 10x better than anything else in a 62 holder that I'd seen. It only set me back in the 3-figure range. At $1500 you'd still have enough left to get a nice $5 gold.
<< <i>
<< <i>This collector is looking for a type coin that showcases the design. For that reason I would not buy an AU-58. Buy a carefully selected MS-64. >>
I once collected this series in MS64 from 07-16S then discovered AU58's that are all there.... A far greater challenge, but out there. >>
I have collected AU-58 coins for years, but if I could afford to buy an MS-64 instead, I'd jump at it.