The color looks nice, but I'm not 100% sure the surfaces are original? Maybe... maybe not. If so, I don't see why it wouldn't straight-grade.
But it looks like a slider to me- likely to get an AU grade. And that being the case, it might not be worth the cost of slabbing it, unless you got it on the cheap and just want it in plastic.
Otherwise, it would look dandy in an album collection.
<< <i>The color looks nice, but I'm not 100% sure the surfaces are original? Maybe... maybe not. >>
The reverse fields look more suspicious then the obverse. >>
Yes, I agree. When I saw the obverse, I thought, "That looks attractive," and then I scrolled down to the reverse, and thought, "not original." I don't think that it will get a straight grade.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
<< <i>When I saw the obverse, I thought, "That looks attractive," and then I scrolled down to the reverse, and thought, "not original." I don't think that it will get a straight grade. >>
I'm going to buck the trend as I believe it'll grade MS-.
HH
Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set: 1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S. Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
Borderline leaning toward body bag. Passed on it when I saw it for sale
The color and the toned field chatter on the reverse don't sit right with me. Images are too fuzzy to tell if it's a cleaned AU or must messed with somehow.
Comments
But it looks like a slider to me- likely to get an AU grade. And that being the case, it might not be worth the cost of slabbing it, unless you got it on the cheap and just want it in plastic.
Otherwise, it would look dandy in an album collection.
<< <i>The color looks nice, but I'm not 100% sure the surfaces are original? Maybe... maybe not. >>
<< <i>
<< <i>The color looks nice, but I'm not 100% sure the surfaces are original? Maybe... maybe not. >>
Yes, I agree. When I saw the obverse, I thought, "That looks attractive," and then I scrolled down to the reverse, and thought, "not original." I don't think that it will get a straight grade.
"A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
<< <i>When I saw the obverse, I thought, "That looks attractive," and then I scrolled down to the reverse, and thought, "not original." I don't think that it will get a straight grade. >>
My thoughts exactly.
HH
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
The color and the toned field chatter on the reverse don't sit right with me. Images are too fuzzy to tell if it's a cleaned AU or must messed with somehow.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
<< <i>looks cleaned and retoned to me, so I think no straight grade >>
ditto
BHNC #203
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
My YouTube Channel