Home U.S. Coin Forum

(My Pictures added) Attractive or Ugly Toning on this Peace Dollar?

moosesrmoosesr Posts: 1,966 ✭✭✭
Opinions on whether the toning on this Peace Dollar is ugly or attractive?

Thanks!

image

image

My Images:

image

image

image

Comments

  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not to my liking. Close to ugly.
  • mercurydimeguymercurydimeguy Posts: 4,625 ✭✭✭✭
    Bad photos so hard to tell, but if photos are accurate, then this is not a coin you'd find in my blue boxes image
  • StuartStuart Posts: 9,761 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Appears to be a scanned image, rather than a true photograph.

    These types of harshly illuminated images tend to depict toning as opaque, rather than how it would appear in more natural reflected light.

    Although the toning appears more like environmental damage in these scanned images, it may look somewhat better in person.

    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • FlatwoodsFlatwoods Posts: 4,181 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't care for it at all.
  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That almost black spot ruins it for me, plus those ugly white prongs. image

    image
  • hopsinhopsin Posts: 212
    Fugly
    Positive BST transactions with Timbuk3, coindeuce, charlottedude.
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hard to tell anything from those photos as I've seen sidewalk chalk drawings with more definition image
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 13,996 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ugly.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ugly....Cheers, RickO
  • lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,408 ✭✭✭
    <<< in the ugly crowd on this one

    of note
    is this ugly or attractive to you
    image
    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


  • machoponchomachoponcho Posts: 355 ✭✭✭
    I rank toned coins on a 0-10 scale, 0 being ugly, 10 being perfect, 5 being neutral. I'd call that a "4". Very original, however. Autumnal. Looks like the brown turns reddish at 6 o'clock on the reverse and might pop a little in-hand.
    I have existed since the creation of this world and will exist until its end. Only my form will change. For these 80 human life years, I have the benefit of having a functioning body and consciousness. I will not waste this opportunity.
  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sorry, no likey.
  • commoncents05commoncents05 Posts: 10,093 ✭✭✭
    If you have to ask, it probably isn't good.

    -Paul
    Many Quality coins for sale at http://www.CommonCentsRareCoins.com
  • DDRDDR Posts: 1,597 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not to my taste, perhaps it looks better in person.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,293 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's not my thing. The toning under the "A" in "AMERICA" and the "R" in "DOLLAR" is the kind of toning that I avoid on silver. It's beyound the point when any of the mint surface is left.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • SkyManSkyMan Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not my cup of tea.
  • stevebensteveben Posts: 4,620 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The toning is not all that is wrong with that peace €:-)
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,819 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ugly, and unlikely to be improved by dipping. The 1922 has the highest mintage of any US silver dollar. This example is like tens of millions just like it...... worth a small premium over melt.
  • halfhunterhalfhunter Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭
    If it was mine, I'd dippit . . .

    HH
    Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set:
    1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
    Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,892 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Damaged. Unfixable. Melt value.
    Lance.
  • goldengolden Posts: 9,811 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ugly!
  • jcpingjcping Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭
    I will pass the coin. Sorry image
    an SLQ and Ike dollars lover
  • AblinkyAblinky Posts: 628 ✭✭✭
    Not a fan of it, at least from the images provided.

    Andrew Blinkiewicz-Heritage

  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,519 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not a coin for me.
    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • moosesrmoosesr Posts: 1,966 ✭✭✭
    I agree with the consensus of opinion that this coin has ugly toning if the dealers picture is accurate. It was part of a two coin deal I made so I had no choice but to buy it in order to get another untoned coin that I wanted. I haven't received the coins yet so I can only hope it is not as ugly as the dealers pictures.

    Thanks for all the opinions.
  • GRANDAMGRANDAM Posts: 8,583 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Not to my liking. Close to ugly. >>




    +1

    GrandAm image
    GrandAm :)
  • etexmikeetexmike Posts: 6,840 ✭✭✭
    With the only 2 options being attractive or ugly...I'll go with ugly.


    Mike
  • BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,503 ✭✭✭✭✭
    obverse likely attractive

    reverse likely unattractive
  • moosesrmoosesr Posts: 1,966 ✭✭✭
    My Images:

    image

    image

    image
  • moosesrmoosesr Posts: 1,966 ✭✭✭
    I think it looks better than I thought it would from the seller's pictures.
  • moosesrmoosesr Posts: 1,966 ✭✭✭
    Does the toning on the coin look somewhat less ugly in my pictures than the sellers?
  • HighReliefHighRelief Posts: 3,676 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Does the toning on the coin look somewhat less ugly in my pictures than the sellers? >>




    No, it is still ugly and needs a good dip.
  • CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Does the toning on the coin look somewhat less ugly in my pictures than the sellers? >>


    Your photo of the reverse brings out a bit more color, but not enough to change my overall opinion of the coin.
    But if you like it, that's really all that matters.
  • StuartStuart Posts: 9,761 ✭✭✭✭✭
    << Your photo of the reverse brings out a bit more color, but not enough to change my overall opinion of the coin.
    But if you like it, that's really all that matters. >>


    I agree with CoinJunkie's above quoted post.

    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,448 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ugly toning and a coin that is going to be a tough sell because of it.
    All glory is fleeting.


  • << <i>

    << <i>Does the toning on the coin look somewhat less ugly in my pictures than the sellers? >>




    No, it is still ugly and needs a good dip. >>



    I was going to second this, but looks like Stuart did, so I'll 'third' this.

    291fifth makes a very valid point, also.
    I'll come up with something, eventually.
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,819 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you were ever tempted to experiment with a coin and a can of EZ-est, this is the one. No downside, very slight upside potential......
  • segojasegoja Posts: 6,136 ✭✭✭✭
    slightly below avg
    JMSCoins Website Link


    Ike Specialist

    Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986

    image
  • claychaserclaychaser Posts: 4,406 ✭✭✭✭
    What's the grade on the slab? Is it NGC?


    ==Looking for pre WW2 Commems in PCGS Rattler holders, 1851-O Three Cent Silvers in all grades



    Successful, problem free and pleasant transactions with: illini420, coinguy1, weather11am,wayneherndon,wondercoin,Topdollarpaid,Julian, bishdigg,seateddime, peicesofme,ajia,CoinRaritiesOnline,savoyspecial,Boom, TorinoCobra71, ModernCoinMart, WTCG, slinc, Patches, Gerard, pocketpiececommems, BigJohnD, RickMilauskas, mirabella, Smittys, LeeG, TomB, DeusExMachina, tydye
  • moosesrmoosesr Posts: 1,966 ✭✭✭
    The grade is MS65 in a NGC Stacks W 57th St Collection holder.

    image
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,448 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Start looking for the "live one" who will pay 65 money for it.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,462 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice pedigree but I don't like the toning. I otherwise agree with the MS 65 grade.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • luckybucksluckybucks Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭
    Decent coin. I like the rainbow toning on the back, but the dark blotch is a killer.

    I love toned coins and hate to see them restored, but this one is a borderline candidate for NCS or PCGS restoration. Who knows, if restored, perhaps it could get a higher grade than 65 (or at least be a very appealing 65).
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,448 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Decent coin. I like the rainbow toning on the back, but the dark blotch is a killer.

    I love toned coins and hate to see them restored, but this one is a borderline candidate for NCS or PCGS restoration. Who knows, if restored, perhaps it could get a higher grade than 65 (or at least be a very appealing 65). >>



    Is a 1922 Peace Dollar ever going to be a "candidate for NCS or PCGS restoration"? It's an ultra-common coin.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,444 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I wouldn't eat crackers in bed with it.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file