Something doesn't look right about it, but it may be the photos or from the paint fumes I've been breathing all morning.... Not your normal primo examples or photography, Tom - trick question? Genuine AU (50) details?? XF45?
The coin was graded probably >25 years ago....Ok, they were a tad stricter back then, but not that strict! It is a relatively low value coin, with little difference in price between grades, so perhaps little thought was put into it. Now if that coin were a 17S Obv, it'd be a whole different story!
On the flip side, probably around the same time that coin was graded, I found a beautiful original lightly toned 17P at a small show in Ohio. The dealer had it marked 'slider', and was firm at $50. A dealer acquaintance of mine, who is now a big shot at Heritage, offered $45 and the dealer passed; I immediately paid up the $50 for it. NGC later gave it a rather generous grade of MS63!
What gets me is that 2 graders AND a finalizer [IIRC a finalizer sees all coins] all agreed to that grade. Must be something about it we can't see I guess.
Wow, I was leaning towards XF40, but thought it looked funny so I net graded it down to VF35 in my guess... perhaps the graders who saw it in hand net graded it down even further for some reason as it certainly has details better than 25.
Looks like a coin that was graded (and very possibly net graded) quite awhile back. VF25 seems to be much like AU53 in that coins with "minor" problems often end up with that grade. By wear, the coin is better than 25.
<< <i>Looks like a coin that was graded (and very possibly net graded) quite awhile back. VF25 seems to be much like AU53 in that coins with "minor" problems often end up with that grade. By wear, the coin is better than 25. >>
I was aware that they often net graded key dates and better date coins, but common widgets?
<< <i>Looks like a coin that was graded (and very possibly net graded) quite awhile back. VF25 seems to be much like AU53 in that coins with "minor" problems often end up with that grade. By wear, the coin is better than 25. >>
I was aware that they often net graded key dates and better date coins, but common widgets? >>
It is difficult to know what the grading service graders were thinking. This coin was graded many years back and their attitude toward such coins could have changed. Coins that aren't quite right are a real problem when grading because personal opinion plays such an important role. I have never been a professional grader but, twenty years ago I would probably have been much more forgiving of a coin like that than I am today. Today I don't want to see any problems with a coin and i am very unforgiving if they have them.
Comments
Not your normal primo examples or photography, Tom - trick question? Genuine AU (50) details?? XF45?
bob
Hoard the keys.
https://imdb.com/name/nm1835107/
Wow . . could be about anything. It has 53-55 details, but the pic shows zero luster . . .
Drunner
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
I'll go "VF" of some type.
<< <i>PR50 or impaired proof??? No idea, just a long shot guess
Now that would be something to see!
speaking of saving this image to lighten it enough to see the coin
"oh my...they are ruff on this example ".....if the "image title" is right
did you forget to send out xmas cards last year or something?
no need to change your user title to ..."walkerologist" anytime soon
as the walker gods aren't happy with you for some reason
i take it you didn't sacrifice your 1st born to the walker god...yet...if the title is right
that's horrible & shameful disrespect there for a grade
or
one heck of an upgrade story to be told
Lance.
I guess the good news is that from VF to AU, the value is not much difference. That said, tough grade for sure!
<< <i>AU55. Sure is a weird pic for the normal ones Tom does. That might just be the point . . . . it has a weird look?
Wow . . could be about anything. It has 53-55 details, but the pic shows zero luster . . .
Drunner >>
I could have just bought it and not had the coin in hand for pics yet!.
So its punt formation... even though I don't feel I have used three downs. Sorry...
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Lance.
10-4,
My Instagram picturesErik
My registry sets
OINK
It is a relatively low value coin, with little difference in price between grades, so perhaps little thought was put into it.
Now if that coin were a 17S Obv, it'd be a whole different story!
On the flip side, probably around the same time that coin was graded, I found a beautiful original lightly toned 17P at a small show
in Ohio. The dealer had it marked 'slider', and was firm at $50. A dealer acquaintance of mine, who is now a big shot at Heritage,
offered $45 and the dealer passed; I immediately paid up the $50 for it. NGC later gave it a rather generous grade of MS63!
From a commercial perspective there's very little pricing spread between VF-30 and XF-40.
Stuart
Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal
"Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
<< <i>Looks like a coin that was graded (and very possibly net graded) quite awhile back. VF25 seems to be much like AU53 in that coins with "minor" problems often end up with that grade. By wear, the coin is better than 25. >>
I was aware that they often net graded key dates and better date coins, but common widgets?
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>
<< <i>Looks like a coin that was graded (and very possibly net graded) quite awhile back. VF25 seems to be much like AU53 in that coins with "minor" problems often end up with that grade. By wear, the coin is better than 25. >>
I was aware that they often net graded key dates and better date coins, but common widgets? >>
It is difficult to know what the grading service graders were thinking. This coin was graded many years back and their attitude toward such coins could have changed. Coins that aren't quite right are a real problem when grading because personal opinion plays such an important role. I have never been a professional grader but, twenty years ago I would probably have been much more forgiving of a coin like that than I am today. Today I don't want to see any problems with a coin and i am very unforgiving if they have them.