Home U.S. Coin Forum

charlotte $5 crackouts, true viewed

stevebensteveben Posts: 4,628 ✭✭✭✭✭
these are recent newps...i cracked them out instead of paying the crossover fees. all comments welcome.

was N45, now P45:
image

was N40 now P35 (i bought it assuming it would downgrade):
image

was N40, now P40 (i thought it might upgrade, oh well...it's the nicest of the bunch):
image

Comments

  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They are all really nice, original mid-grade circ coins. My favorite? Probably the 44 as I know that this date is nearly impossible in decent, unboinked condition. The 54 is a tougher date coin, too. There's nothing wrong with the 42, either.

    Terrific trio!
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>So does the 1842 typically have a different design than the other two, check out the leaves on the rev etc, just trying to learn, not trying to cause trouble. >>


    1842/1843 represented a transition of (mostly letter size) on the reverse of half eagles from all four mints.
  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 29,070 ✭✭✭✭✭
    the 44 looks cleaner to me but the 54 has better crust on it. from what i see and fwiw. jmo
  • AMRCAMRC Posts: 4,280 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 44 by far.
    MLAeBayNumismatics: "The greatest hobby in the world!"
  • joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,763 ✭✭✭✭✭
    44 for me
    may the fonz be with you...always...
  • All look good and fairly graded. They also look as if they've had an old dipping/cleaning; nothing unusual about that for a coin that old, though.
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,370 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>All look good and fairly graded. They also look as if they've had an old dipping/cleaning; nothing unusual about that for a coin that old, though. >>



    Cleaning and dipping are different things. These coins are not cleaned and probably haven't been dipped. They are nice circulated examples and generally original (who can ever really be certain). I think all three will CAC.

    I like the 44 a lot knowing its history. I can see it as a 40 for sure but almost like it as a 35 because it is certaily an "A" 35. This is a tough date to find untouched I would guess due to it's past scarcity relative to the current populations. The prices have come down due to small hoards (this coin being from such an hoard and I own a coin from the same stash).

    The 54-C is a tough date especially with a strong mint mark. It is likely in the top of 5 of C $5's to find in acceptable condition and with a strong mint mark.

    The 42-C ironcially I like the least. Ironcic because I believe I told you about the coin. It's a decent coin for sure but the color isn't as attractive as the other examples. That said it will CAC again.
  • sumnomsumnom Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭
    I like the 44 and the 54 just about equally but the 42 doesn't do much for me.


  • << <i>

    << <i>All look good and fairly graded. They also look as if they've had an old dipping/cleaning; nothing unusual about that for a coin that old, though. >>



    Cleaning and dipping are different things. These coins are not cleaned and probably haven't been dipped. They are nice circulated examples and generally original (who can ever really be certain). I think all three will CAC.

    I like the 44 a lot knowing its history. I can see it as a 40 for sure but almost like it as a 35 because it is certaily an "A" 35. This is a tough date to find untouched I would guess due to it's past scarcity relative to the current populations. The prices have come down due to small hoards (this coin being from such an hoard and I own a coin from the same stash).

    The 54-C is a tough date especially with a strong mint mark. It is likely in the top of 5 of C $5's to find in acceptable condition and with a strong mint mark.

    The 42-C ironcially I like the least. Ironcic because I believe I told you about the coin. It's a decent coin for sure but the color isn't as attractive as the other examples. That said it will CAC again. >>



    And that's why I said cleaned/dipped. Just my opinion. I can see old, faint, but visible hairlines in some. Again; no major issue on a coin this old.

    ps; saying all 3 probably haven't been dipped ever is absurd. I'd say over 90% from this era in pcgs slabs have, at one point.
  • His 50-c in AU50 is a coin that is crusty and I love the look. These are OK.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,799 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>All look good and fairly graded. They also look as if they've had an old dipping/cleaning; nothing unusual about that for a coin that old, though. >>


    Not to me. YMMV
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,370 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>His 50-c in AU50 is a coin that is crusty and I love the look. >>



    I know. I used to own it.
  • BustCudsBustCuds Posts: 1,096 ✭✭✭

    A very nice trio...any of the three would be a welcomed addition image
  • stevebensteveben Posts: 4,628 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>His 50-c in AU50 is a coin that is crusty and I love the look. These are OK. >>



    could you be confusing the grade with originality? i don't blame you for liking the look of the au coin better...it did not see as much commerce as these did...especially the 44.

    the 44 dipped or cleaned? i doubt it...but it has probably had everything else that happens to a coin done it. spent, dropped, flipped, pocketed, lost, muddied, washed, rubbed, and on and on until someone squirreled it away.

    thanks to everyone for the all the comments!
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like the '42..... very appealing.. Cheers, RickO
  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,521 ✭✭✭✭✭
    44 has the best look for sure. I like a lot about the 42 but it has too many marks for me.
    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • JJSingletonJJSingleton Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm a Dahlonega guy but I really like both the 44 and the 54. Both are very nice original, un-messed with, circulated southern gold and would be welcomed in my collection as a C mint type coin. As to the comment above regarding dipping/cleaning I disagree.

    Joseph J. Singleton - First Superintendent of the U.S. Branch Mint in Dahlonega Georgia

    Findley Ridge Collection
    About Findley Ridge

  • CharlotteDudeCharlotteDude Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭✭✭
    All are very nice coins. I like the '54 best with the '44 a close 2nd. Agree that the '54 could easily graded XF-45.

    'Dude
    Got Crust....y gold?
  • s4nys4ny Posts: 1,573 ✭✭✭
    44 and 54 were close for me. Very close.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file