Home U.S. Coin Forum

Guess Grade: Charlotte Half Eagle

imageimage

Any opinions?

Comments



  • << <i>No opinion here!

    image >>



    ... ?
  • Really depends in when it was graded but I would think most could agree on xf45. It looks to me to have a shiny staple scratch on her neck which troubles me a little bit. I don't think it would keep it out of a holder ever but that coupled with the weak C limits the liquidity of the piece.

    Edited to add I see NGC prongs so I up my guess to AU53 but who knows with them
  • No cheating now, everyone! image

    ...I know already did


  • << <i>Really depends in when it was graded but I would think most could agree on xf45. It looks to me to have a shiny staple scratch on her neck which troubles me a little bit. I don't think it would keep it out of a holder ever but that coupled with the weak C limits the liquidity of the piece. >>



    That's what i thought, too. About the details.
  • s4nys4ny Posts: 1,573 ✭✭✭
    Going with XF40.
  • This content has been removed.
  • STONESTONE Posts: 15,275


    << <i>AU55 at NGC, maybe even a 58, judging how lenient they are on no motto gold in general and branch mints like this in particular. PCGS 50/53; ANACS 50/55; ICG the same; NNC 58 or higher. >>


    image

    That seems a bit extreme.

    EF-40 might be low-balling it, but it's not better than EF to me.
  • PlacidPlacid Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭
    40
  • Ef 45... no iodine haaaa
    Support your local Coin Shop
    LM-ANA3242-CSNS308-MSNS226-ICTA
  • jughead1893jughead1893 Posts: 1,903 ✭✭✭✭✭
    50
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,482 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've seen it somewhere. N50, P45. I love branch mint half eagles and this coin does nothing for me.
  • stevebensteveben Posts: 4,653 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Scratched.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,009 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would grade the piece VF-30 with a hedge that it might have been cleaned. I'd have to look at it in person with a 10X to see about cleaning hairlines. At any rate dirt or some level of originality has be removed from the piece. This is not all bad, but grading from a photo is of limited use because of that.

    The commercial grade on this piece is EF-40, especially since the Charlotte mint coins get grading push from the services (often a 5 to 10 point push), but it doesn't make that level from a "collector grade" perspective IMO.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • superpsychmdsuperpsychmd Posts: 1,322 ✭✭✭
    I would say 40
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,009 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I wish that some of you guys would really set down and study an ANA Grading Guide. This coin is a very close match to the piece that is graded VF in that book.

    I don't see how anyone could call this an AU-50. It has lost a lot of micro detail because of wear, and I can't see any mint surface on this coin whatsoever. An AU should have some mint surfaces in the protected areas, even an AU-50. There can be traces of it on an EF-45.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?


  • << <i>I wish that some of you guys would really set down and study an ANA Grading Guide. This coin is a very close match to the piece that is graded VF in that book.

    I don't see how anyone could call this an AU-50. It has lost a lot of micro detail because of wear, and I can't see any mint surface on this coin whatsoever. An AU should have some mint surfaces in the protected areas, even an AU-50. There can be traces of it on an EF-45. >>



    I disagree, most of the detail loss is from strike and there is 5-10% mint frost in the normal protected areas such as her eye, ear and liberty. Not saying I disagree with your commercial grade of 40 but I get there a completely different way. That coin is clearly xf and I don't see this cleaning you speak of. Even the greenish color is tracking to my eyes.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,009 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You guys should spend some time looking at the coins and checking out the grades on the thread called "Charlotte Half Eagles ... Let's see some." It's on the second screen at the moment. Most of the grades there appear to be "spot on" for those coins.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?


  • << <i>You guys should spend some time looking at the coins and checking out the grades on the thread called "Charlotte Half Eagles ... Let's see some." It's on the second screen at the moment. Most of the grades there appear to be "spot on" for those coins. >>



    Most of the coins on the other thread are the top 10% for grade (some even 1%). While it easy to grade perfection when the skin, strike and surfaces are all nice, the exercise is still relevant for less than ideal coins. Most souther gold isn't going to look like it came of of the Kellogg collection, not that it isn't a great standard to strive to but it isn't realistic.

  • This content has been removed.
  • coindeucecoindeuce Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'll be surprised if NGC hasn't net graded it. The chunk of green shmutz (PVC residue?) that is impacted between the left upper serif of the R of AMERICA and a dentil would have been cause for a body bag on gold/silver/copper back in the days preceding net grading.

    "Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
    http://www.american-legacy-coins.com

  • jmbjmb Posts: 596 ✭✭✭
    NGC45

    PCGS40

    NGC is more lenient grade wise with branch mint gold.
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,053 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like an XF45 that's original and doesn't have any major issues. That obverse hairline scratch is probably only visible when angled under a bright light. The only concern is the mintmark is weak and that's what gives this coin the premium it commands.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,816 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It Looks 40 range, but I hate to down other peoples coins, but it really does nothing for me. (I guess if someone asks for opinions, they should be truthful in the answer they provide so. The surfaces are less than marginal, coupled with the weak MM. Just kind of a blah coin IMO

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,009 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>You guys should spend some time looking at the coins and checking out the grades on the thread called "Charlotte Half Eagles ... Let's see some." It's on the second screen at the moment. Most of the grades there appear to be "spot on" for those coins. >>



    Most of the coins on the other thread are the top 10% for grade (some even 1%). While it easy to grade perfection when the skin, strike and surfaces are all nice, the exercise is still relevant for less than ideal coins. Most souther gold isn't going to look like it came of of the Kellogg collection, not that it isn't a great standard to strive to but it isn't realistic. >>



    So you drop your standards, buy "C" level coins and live happy until it comes time sell. It does not sound like a winning strategy to me. I have no problems with lower level coins that are properly graded, but the over graded stuff gives the hobby a black, and my time as a collector I have seen too many of those. "C" level coins bought at discounted prices for the assigned grade can be okay too, but that hard to do.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • DaveGDaveG Posts: 3,535
    Since none of the Charlotte guys have chimed in, allow me to bring some context to this coin:

    From DW's Gold Coins of the Charlotte Mint, 3rd Edition

    The 1854-C remains among the scarcest of the later date Charlotte half eagles; DW estimates that it is the 7th rarest of 24 coins, with total known survivors of 140 - 170, of which 50 - 60 are XF.

    Many 1854-C half eagles are quite weakly struck at the center of the obverse. This is particularly notable on the curls below IBER in LIBERTY. The reverse is weak at the center and this corresponds to the area described for the obverse. The upper leg feathers near the shield, the arrow feathers and the left claw are most often the areas that are weak. A number of 1854-C half eagles are seen with weak or very weak mintmarks. Coins without fully defined mintmarks typically sell for less than those with sharp mintmarks.

    The quality of the planchets used to produce the 1854-C half eagle are not as good as on many of the Charlotte half eagles produced during the early part of the 1850's. Most 1854-C half eagles are quite heavily abraded with deep, detracting marks in the fields.

    This date is among the hardest Charlotte half eagles to find with good eye appeal. The weakness of strike at the centers makes many examples appear to have greater wear than they actually have. In addition, some have planchet problems which are detracting. Any 1854-C that is choice and attractive is very rare and deserving of a strong premium over a typical example.

    Check out the Southern Gold Society

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,482 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I sure hope that the OP bought this coin and is not drawing negative attention to a coin in a dealers inventory.

    This is my 54-C. Nicest I have seen and ex a very well respected fellow Southern Gold collector. It's a tough date but no where near tough to the point where I would ever compromise on quality.

    image


  • Obverse XF40, reverse XF45, so XF40.

    rodorr
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,009 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The only way one can assign this coin a higher grade than its apparent sharpness grade is to grade by surfaces. That is not easy to do from photographs. Did this coin lack full mint sharpness when it was struck? It is much more than likely than not that it did not full detail. Still the surfaces on this piece look "tired" to me, like a piece that saw several years of circulation. Therefore I graded it Choice VF.

    The Charlotte mint did issue an lot of sub-standard coins in the 1850s. Here is an 1857-C gold dollar from two points of view as to the color. PCGS graded this piece EF-45. The gray color (second photo) is more like how the coin looks in person.

    imageimage

    imageimage
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • CharlotteDudeCharlotteDude Posts: 3,206 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like it as an XF-45. Looks like a nice looking coin, color-wise, with original skin and some dirt in places. A few marks here and there, that don't trouble much. The mintmark is weak, though, albeit still visible.

    Bill J, that's a nice looking 1857-C $1. I'm very familiar with that coin - call it an "old friend".

    'dude
    Got Crust....y gold?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file