Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

Grade this please

I'm only going to show the obverse.

I have to disagree with the grade it received. What do you think?

image

Disclaimer: I do not own this coin.
Former owner, Cambridge Gate collection.

Comments

  • Wybrit it would depend on luster which I can't tell from the picture. To me it is either a 62 or a 58.
  • PokermandudePokermandude Posts: 2,713 ✭✭✭
    I think it got a (PCGS) 60 and you think it's a 62.

    Looks Unc to me, somewhere in the 60-62 range.
    http://stores.ebay.ca/Mattscoin - Canadian coins, World Coins, Silver, Gold, Coin lots, Modern Mint Products & Collections
  • JCMhoustonJCMhouston Posts: 5,306 ✭✭✭
    Well that's a big old image, based on the large image it looks really beat up and a 62 or so, but I usually wouldn't try to guess.

    image

    Now from a smaller image I'd guess 63 or 64.
  • YQQYQQ Posts: 3,332 ✭✭✭✭✭
    well, if I remember right, MS stands for Mint State.
    So, logically, a MS grade would be for a uncirculated coin.
    that said, this coin is circulated and has some "dings". This is clearly visible. these dings are not bag marks.
    If I would grade this coin, Canadian standards, I would give is a AU 55.
    However, NGC and PCGS might have other ideas and say it is a MS 60 or better.
    So, where would that leave the Mint State designation?
    remember, grading is subjective... and everyone has different standards.
    h
    Today is the first day of the rest of my life
  • MacCrimmonMacCrimmon Posts: 7,058 ✭✭✭
    My uneducated eye keeps gravitating towards, "Genuine - Cleaned". The image appears to show evidences of an improper dip.
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,550 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Big ass image there. MS61 my grade. PCGS: MS64

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • MacCrimmonMacCrimmon Posts: 7,058 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Big ass image there. MS61 my grade. PCGS: MS64 >>




    The subject coin is British, so shouldn't it be "big arse" image. image
  • SmEagle1795SmEagle1795 Posts: 2,193 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Big ass image there. MS61 my grade. PCGS: MS64 >>




    The subject coin is British, so shouldn't it be "big arse" image. image >>



    image
    Learn about our world's shared history told through the first millennium of coinage: Colosseo Collection
  • worldcoinguyworldcoinguy Posts: 3,026 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I will roll with ajaan on a 61.

    Nice piece.
  • mnemtsas2mnemtsas2 Posts: 745 ✭✭✭
    From those images I'd have said AU58/MS62. I cheated and saw the real grade which is a little surprising.
    Successful trades with Syracusian, DeiGratia, LordM, WWW, theboz11, CCC2010, Hyperion, ajaan, wybrit, Dennis88 and many others.
  • theboz11theboz11 Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭
    I would be real tough with all that chatter and give it a 50.
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,550 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The subject coin is British, so shouldn't it be "big arse" image >>


    Right Mac. My apologies.

    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • ExbritExbrit Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭✭
    Just a guess that its Not MS - EF?
  • TwoKopeikiTwoKopeiki Posts: 9,812 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS62. Might get a 63 if all the graders just came back from a liquid lunch.
  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,504 ✭✭✭✭✭
    man that's way too big an image to view comfortably shees
    but seriously its def MS and not much wear - the dings/nicks are totally magnified obviously so my guess is 62 probably 63 even!
  • AndresAndres Posts: 977 ✭✭✭
    -----> AUNC 55 <------ apart from the dings and scratches, I dont like the condition of the rim.
    collector of Greek banknotes - most beautifull world banknotes - Greek & Roman ancient coins.
  • PokermandudePokermandude Posts: 2,713 ✭✭✭


    << <i>From those images I'd have said AU58/MS62. I cheated and saw the real grade which is a little surprising. >>



    ISWYDT (I see what you did there)!

    The grade is indeed very surprising.
    http://stores.ebay.ca/Mattscoin - Canadian coins, World Coins, Silver, Gold, Coin lots, Modern Mint Products & Collections
  • HyperionHyperion Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭
    tell you what, if it's one of those 1902 matte proof jobbers and it survived the great "rub off" at the mint, it might get an unexpectedly good grade for relative excellence. (e.g. an example which wasn't scratched to hades)

    that being said, Id say 62 and be happy to own it.
  • LochNESSLochNESS Posts: 4,829 ✭✭✭
    I initially thought AU55 because it has a lot of dings and the rim appears damaged. But the more I read the OP's surprise... I'm thinking Genuine: Surface Damage

    edit: just saw the answer image
    ANA LM • WBCC 429

    Amat Colligendo Focum

    Top 10FOR SALE

    image
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,718 ✭✭✭✭✭
    While the obverse carries the grade, a shot of the reverse would help. I say this for three reasons:

    High spots and possible rub
    Signs of a dip that exist on the obverse
    Die issues

    I will play after seeing the reverse. In the spirit of fair play, I predict Wybrit is not happy with the grade and I may not be either

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

Sign In or Register to comment.