Guess The Grade 1811 CBH

harveypb

Just got this back graded from PCGS. I thought it was a little higher grade
but nevertheless, its still worth more in a PCGS holder. Guess the Grade.





Harvey BHNC #127

STONE

AU-55

JRocco

AU 50

123cents

AU-55.

mkman123

AU50 is what I posted on another forum that you posted this pic on

BustHalfBrian

I'm thinking AU53, but subdued luster could've held it back to a 50...

especially since you say you believe it deserved a higher grade at PCGS.

Raybo

53

illini420

AU55

harveypb

It came back AU53, I thought it was an AU55.

I'm still pleased. Its worth more in the holder than raw...

BustHalfBrian

<< <i>It came back AU53, I thought it was an AU55.

I'm still pleased. Its worth more in the holder than raw... >>



Couldn't quite venture to call it 55, but I could see why you might have hoped it'd receive that.

I just think the wear is a little too deep, but I will say that the violet/blue Whitman album toning really gives the coin some character...

And like you said - just be happy it didn't get BB'd.

coinlieutenant

50

fastfreddie

Knocked -5 for dust in the holder =45.

Looks decent, got a close up?

Walkerguy21D

AU53 seems about right, I'd expect more luster on a 55.
Nice coin regardless - you don't see many of these early busties this nice - that strike appears exceptional!

CoinRaritiesOnline

50.

stealer

45, possibly 50 due to luster bump. Lots of deep wear especially in the hair curls.

pursuitofliberty

I like this one as a 50+ ... maybe a 55, but maybe not quite

mozin

From the pictures, I would guess PCGS 50.

lkeigwin

53 seems right. PCGS loves luster and I think that held it back.
Lance.

johnny9434

au 50/53. jmo