nice origial coin. too dark for the masses though, plenty of them around that have been stripped down and are now unnaturally bright... if thats what ya like.
regardless of how many posts I have, I don't consider myself an "expert" at anything
Yes but I've seen darker coins graded in top tier slabs.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Well, the FYOI Roosevelt in MS60 that was left in a nook in the eastern facing portion of the foundation of my house when built is way, way darker. Comes close to obscuring the date yet has no wear. It looks good next to a 59 BB Jeff 5C.
<< <i>The color looks funky to me like artificial crustiness. >>
Yes, I wondered about that a bit. Not that it is, but reminded me a tiny bit of felt tip marker and other junk. a 20 will obviously have some "shine" - my 10c is dead matte, but it had not been touched. Wise Bear talked about original fairy powdery surfaces or however he put it so well. This dime was covered in dust!
Much too dark, and it would be a "no grade" if I were a third party grader. This has reached the point to where I would call it "corroded silver."
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Doesn't work for me. If it came into the shop I would not pay VF money for it, nor would I sell it for VF money. For just a bit more money a nice AU can be had.
Just my 2 cents worth (even at 2 cents some say my advise is over priced)
I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector. Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
I'm assuming that the reverse largely looks like the obverse. Given that, I don't really care for the look of the coin. If I am interpreting the surfaces correctly, then they don't remind me so much of a deeply dirty coin, but rather one that had something applied to them at some point. However, at $315 all-in I don't think you have to worry too much, if at all.
Yes, it's too dark for me and 1800 CC are readily available with better looking alternatives. The only thing that would maybe (big maybe) tempt me on this would be if it was a 1880/79 rev of 78. If it's just a standard 1880/79 (most of not all are) there is no premium, and the color/pitting/scratches are a big distraction
Comments
-Paul
if the only 2 choices are black vs stripped pls white, give 'em to me nice n dirty
.
peacockcoins
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I like this Morgan $.
Best wishes,
Eric
<< <i>The color looks funky to me like artificial crustiness. >>
Yes, I wondered about that a bit. Not that it is, but reminded me a tiny bit of felt tip marker and other junk. a 20 will obviously have some "shine" - my 10c is dead matte, but it had not been touched. Wise Bear talked about original fairy powdery surfaces or however he put it so well. This dime was covered in dust!
Eric
Though it might be almost a cliché to say it, I think that coin's got a bit of character. Hey... it's almost a CircCam.
bleached black then carried a lil and retoned?
whatever the case...she's a wore n tore one
The Whisker Cheek Collection - Top 50 Peace VAM Registry
Landmark Buffalo Collection
Think it would grade now?
crust down. I'm neutral on it as it is.
bob
I love it!
peacockcoins
Just my 2 cents worth (even at 2 cents some say my advise is over priced)
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
peacockcoins
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
The reverse is about as crusty (perhaps a shade lighter):
80-CC Morgan LINK
peacockcoins