Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Check out my new 1956 Type 1 Franklin Half Dollar!

ModCrewmanModCrewman Posts: 4,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
Picked this up this weekend. What do you think?

image

Comments

  • lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,424 ✭✭✭
    looks easy cam on this reverse...what's the obverse loook like???
    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


  • georgiacop50georgiacop50 Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭✭
    Looks high grade!
  • ModCrewmanModCrewman Posts: 4,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    You just had to ask didn't you? image

    image
  • MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 8,947 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Half of that Franklin is AWESOME. image
  • mkman123mkman123 Posts: 6,849 ✭✭✭✭
    Still a nice coin!!
    Successful Buying and Selling transactions with:

    Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.


  • << <i>Still a nice coin!! >>




    image
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice Franklin... not CAM, but very nice. Cheers, RickO
  • ajmanajman Posts: 1,359 ✭✭✭
    Beautiful coin, what's the difference between Ty. 1 and Ty. 2? I was watching (gulp) Rick Tomaska on tv one day and I thought it had something to do with the eagle on the reverse. But I can't remember what specifically.
    Beer is Proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy -Benjamin Franklin-
  • ModCrewmanModCrewman Posts: 4,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The Type I is the design as used from 1950 - early 1956, and the Type II is the design used from Later 1956 - 1963. You can see more detail on the small eagle on the reverse of the Type II, the Type I is the rarer of the two.

    image
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The Type I is the design as used from 1950 - early 1956, and the Type II is the design used from Later 1956 - 1963. You can see more detail on the small eagle on the reverse of the Type II, the Type I is the rarer of the two.
    >>

    Wouldn't the term "less common" be more appropriate? image
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • ModCrewmanModCrewman Posts: 4,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Perhaps less "less common" would be better terminology, however "rarer" would not be incorrect either as it is "more rare", than the T2, though of course neither are rare in a "5 known" sense of the word. image

    That being said, my experience is that maybe 1 in 20 sets I look at has the Type I?
  • SkyManSkyMan Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Congrats on the pickup! I like it.

    I also have a one sided '56 T.1 with the cameo on the reverse. Since the reverse is the side you're going to be looking at/showing, it seems to me that that is the more important side to have cameo contrast on, so I quite like how yours looks. Here's mine...
    image
    image
  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,544 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Count me in as a collector who has a 1956 Type 1 half dollar that has a brilliant obverse and a Cameo reverse.

    I also have one or two brilliant Type 1 1956 half dollars.

    It is not very often that a Type 1 half will show up in an OGP proof set.
  • ModCrewmanModCrewman Posts: 4,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The real tease of it is the OGP envelope was labeled "Cameo Half", and it came out tails side up...talk about getting worked into a frothy frenzy only to be let down so cruelly.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file