Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

I think I found a DDO Franklin proof... Close up pics

MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 9,256 ✭✭✭✭✭
I went ahead and purchased that little microscope camera thingy. I've been looking up close at all kinds of coins
lately and I have to say, this little gadget is very cool.

Here's some shots of a 62 proof Franklin I just got in a trade... I think it's legit doubling and not just strike..

It's tough to see here, but the 2 has some slight doubling...
image

The rest of these are more obvious
image
image
image
image
image
image

Comments

  • Options
    epcjimi1epcjimi1 Posts: 3,489 ✭✭✭
    I like the R.
  • Options
    MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 9,256 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just for fun, here's a 1957-D business strike Franklin. I had set this in a flip a couple years ago because I noticed
    the doubling on the reverse. I believe it is just double struck and not worth a premium but it sure looks cool
    under this camera...
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
  • Options
    STONESTONE Posts: 15,275
    I believe it is strike doubling image
  • Options
    CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,433 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I believe it is strike doubling image >>



    image

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yep... machine doubling... I see no split serifs... Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 25,038 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The split serifs L tells me you have correctly identified this baby!

    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Options
    Batman23Batman23 Posts: 5,375 ✭✭✭✭✭
    At first I was thinking machine doubling untill I saw the split serifs on the Y and L. I think you might have something there.
  • Options
    MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 9,256 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>At first I was thinking machine doubling untill I saw the split serifs on the Y and L. I think you might have something there. >>



    I haven't crossed referenced it yet with the Cherrypickers guide... but it sure looked promising to me.
    I see what the rest of you are saying as well, not all the letters pictured appear to be split serifs.
  • Options
    CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The coin in this thread does not match the DDO in the 4th edition of the CPG. FS-50-1962-101 has doubling on the 62 and We Trust. (and the doubling on the 62 is different than the coin shown in the OP)

    Unless there is a new '62 DDO, I'll stick by machine doubling.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • Options
    19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,503 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>At first I was thinking machine doubling untill I saw the split serifs on the Y and L. I think you might have something there. >>

    It's unfortunate when machine doubling occurs on these coins. Very unfortunate.
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • Options
    All 1962 halves (P, D, and proof) have master die doubling. I can't tell if there's any doubling in addition to that. Here are closeups of DDO-001 and DDO-002 (FS-101). BTW, the FS-101 seems to be a tough variety. I've only found one of these which is the only one PCGS has certified. There's a couple other DDOs listed by CONECA but I don't have images and a couple in the Treasure Hunting Book. The 1957-D looks like machine doubling.

    DDO-001

    image

    image

    image

    image



    DDO-002 (FS-101)

    image

    image
  • Options
    while not as cool as the bid DDR found in the other thread at least this one has pictures image
  • Options
    lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,895 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like mechanical doubling to me. The flat, lower shelfs, unnotched corners, no true split serifs.
    Lance.
  • Options
    gonzergonzer Posts: 3,085 ✭✭✭✭✭
    With the tell-tale slide of the mintmark I'd say strike doubling no doubt.
  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 33,104 ✭✭✭✭✭
    its an intersting piece in any case.
  • Options
    MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 9,256 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>With the tell-tale slide of the mintmark I'd say strike doubling no doubt. >>



    I knew that about the business strike 1957 D Franklin. It's the proof I was hopeful for.

    Thanks frnklnlvr for the photos of the cherrypicker's examples... that's very helpful even if they do not appear to look like mine.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file