Valuing "Monster toning"

Id really like to get a "monster" toned morgan. I mean, something crazy, over the top, neon, etc. (that I like).
However, I know nothing about buying something like this.
How much of a premium does something like this carry? Is it something that will retain its value?
Since it isn't something I need, and since I know they are really hot right now, I just want to try and get my head around them.
Sorry if this question is a little vague, but I'd appreciate any input.
Thanks!
However, I know nothing about buying something like this.
How much of a premium does something like this carry? Is it something that will retain its value?
Since it isn't something I need, and since I know they are really hot right now, I just want to try and get my head around them.
Sorry if this question is a little vague, but I'd appreciate any input.
Thanks!
0
Comments
Lance.
That being said, there are plenty of super-vibrant obverse toned Morgans with many of the same colors that can be had for $400-$1000.
Bstclser
coinsarefun
Good luck on your search
<< <i>Check the BST for these two theyre what you seek
Bstclser
coinsarefun
Good luck on your search >>
Thanks twinturbo
Yes, you can check my bst in my signature line below
Otherwise I am bringing them to Las Vegas show tomarrow
.
CoinsAreFun Toned Silver Eagle Proof Album
.
Gallery Mint Museum, Ron Landis& Joe Rust, The beginnings of the Golden Dollar
.
More CoinsAreFun Pictorials NGC
1) You need a boilerplate, no questions asked ability to be able to spot such a coin. If you can't spot one, you will overpay for such a coin, and to add insult to injury, it might be a monster.
2) Maybe it's just me, but I never buy a very popular coin. Not only will you pay a toning premium, but you will also pay a bid-up price for such coin. Coins which aren't quite as popular cost less. Even Bust $s aren't as expensive as they were four or five years ago in almost all grades.
3) These toners have a limited, but very devoted following. Some people can and will pay a 20X premium for a nicely toned Morgan. Because of this, you might have problems selling the coin for what you paid for it.
4) Maybe it's just me, but I'm trying to get away from buying coins I don't need, or don't fit my collection.
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
Rainbow Toning's Effect on Price
In post #23 in that thread, I posted photos of an MS65 1886 Morgan Dollar with dramatic rainbow toning that I purchased from Heritage in 2002 for $719. I also stated that I could probably sell that coin for a small premium. Well, I auctioned that coin last month and it realized $776 nine years later.
Morgan Dollar NGC MS65 2002 June Long Beach Sale $719
Morgan Dollar NGC MS65 2011 November Beverly Hills Sale $776
There are many people out there who can't stand that toning enthusiasts pay huge premiums to obtain coins with exceptional eye appeal. They will declare you a fool for paying such exorbitant premiums and will try to scare you with stories that predict the collapse of the toned coin market. My advice to you is to listen to people who know what they are talking about in relation to this subject. There are many very experienced collectors on this forum with years of experience buying and selling rainbow toned coins. Seek them out, and pick their brains.
I want to be clear that I am not simply advising you to start collecting rainbow toned coins. IMO, rainbow toned coins represent the deep end of the pool and those collectors without the requisite experience to swim in deep waters will drown rather quickly. Although the naysayers are wrong about the impending collapse of the toned coin market, they are correct to warn you about the potential dangers of the market.
If you are looking to buy just one monster toned coin, my recommendation is to buy the highest graded monster toned coin that you can afford. An MS67 or MS66 example might cost more, but they will also have a higher percentage of their value represented by the numismatic value of the grade rather than relying solely on the toning to drive the price. It is important to remember that as the grade and price guide value decrease, the toning premium as a percentage of price guide increases. For example, my MS65 1886 shown above sold for $776 which is 4.2X Numismedia Wholesale. Now consider if that coin had the same toning but was graded an MS64 instead of MS65, it is reasonable to think that it could have reached $400-$500 at auction. The Numismedia Wholesale for an MS65 1885 Morgan Dollar is $85 making the proposed premium range 4.7X to 5.88X wholesale. By doing this, you create a hedge against the toning premium and reduce your overall risk.
I personally refuse to pay that kind of money as the market for these can be very thin and it may be very difficult to get your investment back.
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
I try never to use the term. MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
4) Maybe it's just me, but I'm trying to get away from buying coins I don't need, or don't fit my collection.
Successful BST xactions w/PCcoins, Drunner, Manofcoins, Rampage, docg, Poppee, RobKool, and MichealDixon.
Now Monster Toners are neat and they can cost the proverbial arm and a leg sad to
say I do not have one BUT I do have maybe 100 Morgans that are colorful and I can
look at THEM for hours and see their beauty rather than look at one beauty. If you
want the real challenge find a Monster Peace Dollar, then you have really done
something by finding a real rarity.
The way I look at a "monster toning" coin is that-
Think about morgan dollars.
ms63's= >$100
ms64's= >$100
ms65 >$200
ms66 > $400
ms67 > $750
Now if I find a monster morgan, I just think- "how many times a generic common date is this worth to me?"
That for the most part is the market for them (and all coins?) What am I willing to spend?
Or, as Anaconda used to say, put the coin in one hand and the pile of money in the other and ask yourself, "Which would you rather have?"
<< <i>I cry foul internally on 90% of the posts that state a coin is a "monster. That is where 90% of the people go wrong when buying one for the first time.
I try never to use the term. MJ >>
Bingo. There are few monsters compared to those that claim monster. There are those where every coin owned by them by default is a monster. There are also numerous toned collector/dealers that has have great material and then get the occasional monster.
<< <i>
<< <i>I cry foul internally on 90% of the posts that state a coin is a "monster. That is where 90% of the people go wrong when buying one for the first time.
I try never to use the term. MJ >>
Bingo. There are few monsters compared to those that claim monster. There are those where every coin owned by them by default is a monster. There are also numerous toned collector/dealers that has have great material and then get the occasional monster. >>
I agree. Real monster Morgans get sucked out of the marketplace very quickly, and a 10X toning premium won't touch one of these (if it's a generic MS64-66). The 'mini-me's' are far less likely to garner collector interest. I don't really understand why some posters are fixated on the grade per se---the real value of any monster is in its color. As Sonnier once pointed out, 'no grades, no fights.'
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
<< <i>Be very careful if you don't know the market on these. What some folks call "Monsters" others may not. Of course when they own them they are all monsters
<< <i>The way I look at a "monster toning" coin is that-
Think about morgan dollars.
ms63's= >$100
ms64's= >$100
ms65 >$200
ms66 > $400
ms67 > $750
Now if I find a monster morgan, I just think- "how many times a generic common date is this worth to me?"
That for the most part is the market for them (and all coins?) What am I willing to spend? >>
I like this method too, it usually stops me from over-spending versus a nice brilliant example.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>I cry foul internally on 90% of the posts that state a coin is a "monster. That is where 90% of the people go wrong when buying one for the first time.
I try never to use the term. MJ >>
Bingo. There are few monsters compared to those that claim monster. There are those where every coin owned by them by default is a monster. There are also numerous toned collector/dealers that has have great material and then get the occasional monster. >>
I agree. Real monster Morgans get sucked out of the marketplace very quickly, and a 10X toning premium won't touch one of these (if it's a generic MS64-66). The 'mini-me's' are far less likely to garner collector interest. I don't really understand why some posters are fixated on the grade per se---the real value of any monster is in its color. As Sonnier once pointed out, 'no grades, no fights.' >>
Definitely agree with this! Here is a coin that is very nice, but NOT a monster:
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
I guess my initial confusion about it all is the fact that they due command such a premium. A lot of people say focus on the little guys that people don't want because they are cheap...but that's just it...people don't want them. Personally, I try to buy coins I want to keep, but I think I'd rather have something that makes people go crazy and say I paid a little extra for rather than something that is pretty good looking, but only paid $100 for and could only get $80 if I resold it.
I guess my next question would be, what defines "Monster". I always assumed it was in the eye of the beholder. Technically anyone could call anything a monster right?
I'd love to hear your definitions!
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>I cry foul internally on 90% of the posts that state a coin is a "monster. That is where 90% of the people go wrong when buying one for the first time.
I try never to use the term. MJ >>
Bingo. There are few monsters compared to those that claim monster. There are those where every coin owned by them by default is a monster. There are also numerous toned collector/dealers that has have great material and then get the occasional monster. >>
I agree. Real monster Morgans get sucked out of the marketplace very quickly, and a 10X toning premium won't touch one of these (if it's a generic MS64-66). The 'mini-me's' are far less likely to garner collector interest. I don't really understand why some posters are fixated on the grade per se---the real value of any monster is in its color. As Sonnier once pointed out, 'no grades, no fights.' >>
Definitely agree with this! Here is a coin that is very nice, but NOT a monster:
Could you post this coin next to what you'd consider a monster just for comparison? Thanks!
Just my thoughts.
Good luck!
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>I cry foul internally on 90% of the posts that state a coin is a "monster. That is where 90% of the people go wrong when buying one for the first time.
I try never to use the term. MJ >>
Bingo. There are few monsters compared to those that claim monster. There are those where every coin owned by them by default is a monster. There are also numerous toned collector/dealers that has have great material and then get the occasional monster. >>
I agree. Real monster Morgans get sucked out of the marketplace very quickly, and a 10X toning premium won't touch one of these (if it's a generic MS64-66). The 'mini-me's' are far less likely to garner collector interest. I don't really understand why some posters are fixated on the grade per se---the real value of any monster is in its color. As Sonnier once pointed out, 'no grades, no fights.' >>
Definitely agree with this! Here is a coin that is very nice, but NOT a monster:
I would have NO ISSUES with owning that coin, monster or not. Assuming the pic is an accurate representation of the coin.
A group of toned Morgans (some in GSA holders) was sold by Legend Numismatics and others during the last couple of years. Using the Advanced Search function, type in Sonnier. There were some monsters in his collection. Most highly coveted toned Morgans have obverse toning. Hopefully, Aurora Borealis will post some of his coins (or just look at the 1881S PCGS MS65+ CAC coin in the thread he started). The Jhon E. Cash website also has a tutorial on toned Morgans. You need to look at LOTS of toned Morgans to develop an informed opinion regarding what types of coloration (and where the colors are on the coin) contribute to collector lust (and realistic marketplace price).
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
<< <i>I wrote a thread about this subject 3 years ago on a different forum. If you read the link, I think you will find it informative even if it was met with much resistance when I posted it.
Rainbow Toning's Effect on Price
In post #23 in that thread, I posted photos of an MS65 1886 Morgan Dollar with dramatic rainbow toning that I purchased from Heritage in 2002 for $719. I also stated that I could probably sell that coin for a small premium. Well, I auctioned that coin last month and it realized $776 nine years later.
Morgan Dollar NGC MS65 2002 June Long Beach Sale $719
Morgan Dollar NGC MS65 2011 November Beverly Hills Sale $776
There are many people out there who can't stand that toning enthusiasts pay huge premiums to obtain coins with exceptional eye appeal. They will declare you a fool for paying such exorbitant premiums and will try to scare you with stories that predict the collapse of the toned coin market. My advice to you is to listen to people who know what they are talking about in relation to this subject. There are many very experienced collectors on this forum with years of experience buying and selling rainbow toned coins. Seek them out, and pick their brains.
I want to be clear that I am not simply advising you to start collecting rainbow toned coins. IMO, rainbow toned coins represent the deep end of the pool and those collectors without the requisite experience to swim in deep waters will drown rather quickly. Although the naysayers are wrong about the impending collapse of the toned coin market, they are correct to warn you about the potential dangers of the market.
If you are looking to buy just one monster toned coin, my recommendation is to buy the highest graded monster toned coin that you can afford. An MS67 or MS66 example might cost more, but they will also have a higher percentage of their value represented by the numismatic value of the grade rather than relying solely on the toning to drive the price. It is important to remember that as the grade and price guide value decrease, the toning premium as a percentage of price guide increases. For example, my MS65 1886 shown above sold for $776 which is 4.2X Numismedia Wholesale. Now consider if that coin had the same toning but was graded an MS64 instead of MS65, it is reasonable to think that it could have reached $400-$500 at auction. The Numismedia Wholesale for an MS65 1885 Morgan Dollar is $85 making the proposed premium range 4.7X to 5.88X wholesale. By doing this, you create a hedge against the toning premium and reduce your overall risk. >>
For my tastes that would not be a nearly $800 coin. No dazzle, pizzazz or neon effect to the colors.
Keep in mind that grade adds price, but not necessarily pretty. A 62 with awesome colors isn't any more awesome in 66. The other thing to keep in mind is that you will pay more for a coin toned on the obverse than you will for the exact same toning/corrosion/damage on the reverse even tho it is 50:50 dumb luck which side gets the color. IMO some patterns actually look better on one side than the other. The percent of area toned is also a factor; the greater the better. There really isn't much that is better than a nice bag toned Morgan.
I like this one among my small hoard for its iridescent toning.
Looks great for a 64.
Finally, don't rule out the endrollers.
If ye could find a killer toner in a doily, that would be the best of both worlds.
<< <i>This may be understood and may be said already, but if you are going to go Monster hunting, I would highly recommend it not be online. Pics are to easily manipulated to bring out qualities and vibrancy that may not actually exist.
Just my thoughts.
Good luck! >>
That's a good point. Unfortunately coin shows where I live are few and far between and shops are non-existent...
My options are to drive a long way to a show, or buy coins that have return policies I suppose...
Link
Coinfame,Kaelasdad,Type2,UNLVino,MICHAELDIXON
Justacommeman,tydye,78saen,123cents,blue62vette,Segoja,Nibanny
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>I cry foul internally on 90% of the posts that state a coin is a "monster. That is where 90% of the people go wrong when buying one for the first time.
I try never to use the term. MJ >>
Bingo. There are few monsters compared to those that claim monster. There are those where every coin owned by them by default is a monster. There are also numerous toned collector/dealers that has have great material and then get the occasional monster. >>
I agree. Real monster Morgans get sucked out of the marketplace very quickly, and a 10X toning premium won't touch one of these (if it's a generic MS64-66). The 'mini-me's' are far less likely to garner collector interest. I don't really understand why some posters are fixated on the grade per se---the real value of any monster is in its color. As Sonnier once pointed out, 'no grades, no fights.' >>
Definitely agree with this! Here is a coin that is very nice, but NOT a monster:
Could you post this coin next to what you'd consider a monster just for comparison? Thanks! >>
To find what I would call "monster" toners, check out this thread: Monsters
Oh, and the pic of the 1887 dollar reverse I posted is I believe a Todd (bluccphotos) picture, not juiced.
An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.
<< <i>
<< <i>This may be understood and may be said already, but if you are going to go Monster hunting, I would highly recommend it not be online. Pics are to easily manipulated to bring out qualities and vibrancy that may not actually exist.
Just my thoughts.
Good luck! >>
That's a good point. Unfortunately coin shows where I live are few and far between and shops are non-existent...
My options are to drive a long way to a show, or buy coins that have return policies I suppose... >>
It's kinda dumb luck that you'd ever find one at a smaller show.
<< <i>Be very careful if you don't know the market on these. What some folks call "Monsters" others may not. Of course when they own them they are all monsters
Exactly right. Almost all Morgan's posted here I have seen are not even close to monster. Get ready to pay in the 4 figures or higher for that one of a kind.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>I cry foul internally on 90% of the posts that state a coin is a "monster. That is where 90% of the people go wrong when buying one for the first time.
I try never to use the term. MJ >>
Bingo. There are few monsters compared to those that claim monster. There are those where every coin owned by them by default is a monster. There are also numerous toned collector/dealers that has have great material and then get the occasional monster. >>
I agree. Real monster Morgans get sucked out of the marketplace very quickly, and a 10X toning premium won't touch one of these (if it's a generic MS64-66). The 'mini-me's' are far less likely to garner collector interest. I don't really understand why some posters are fixated on the grade per se---the real value of any monster is in its color. As Sonnier once pointed out, 'no grades, no fights.' >>
Definitely agree with this! Here is a coin that is very nice, but NOT a monster:
Could you post this coin next to what you'd consider a monster just for comparison? Thanks! >>
To find what I would call "monster" toners, check out this thread: Monsters
Oh, and the pic of the 1887 dollar reverse I posted is I believe a Todd (bluccphotos) picture, not juiced. >>
There are toners that are either awesome or average depending on the viewing angle.
Rainbow Stars
There is another way to tell as well...
Hope you enjoy my examples and happy collecting... AB
Non monster very cool
Monster
Moose
Eric
Link
AB
<< <i>"comma'' here is a great read for you if you haven`t already seen it... Valuable info put together by Brandon Kelley with additional info written by Doug Kurz (Sunnywood) ... A must read for a toned Morgan enthusiast...
Link
AB
Thank you SO much! I loved your detail description and pictures...and a very useful link as well!
I hope that someday I hold a coin that falls into the "moose" category (and buy it!)
Unfortunately I don't have a lot of opportunity to see coins in hand...so this is a really hard place to fall into (wanting to find one of these coins, but being restricted mostly to the internet)
I will keep my eyes open and keep reading and getting valuable information from the members here!!
<< <i>
Moose
Other than Sunnywood's MS68 1881-S, that might be the coolest 1881-S on the planet. BRAVO!
Now where the hell are my socks?
Larry L.
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
<< <i>Buy something awesome, not just very nice....one super coin tops ten nice ones. >>
Quality trumps quantity.
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]