Update on what is going on. I wasnt going to use this post but sense its up here I will. I finally got the card in hand. It was sent USPS 1st class with DC paded envelope. I just have to take his word for the returned package thing. I have been on both sides of the table now. Thanks again for eveyone on here again!! I jumped too soon on this one, but I did see some red flags. Hope Jeremy and all yall see that. I apoligize if I did anything wrong by this thread. Just happy right now to have the card . Thanks again!
<< <i>The card is messed up looking. Ill give it that much. Not to happy with the whole deal to tell the truth. >>
Sounds more like buyer's remorse to me.
You started a thread pretty quickly after purchase to bash the seller (around a holiday), constantly irritating looking for a refund. Now you have the card and your only comment is "card is messed up looking." Let's see a scan. Describe why the card is les than you expected. Its hard to take you too seriously at this point.
Was that non-card picture there when that thread was active??
---------------------- Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989 ----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
That cut isn't unusual for the Aaron, I doubt it's trimmed. It's actually in the PSA 6 range even with the cut and the print line assuming there are no hidden flaws.
I'm glad I was fresh out of gold so I had no way of pulling the trigger on that deal.
From what I can tell, 707 is the DOLLAR STORE compared to deans_cards. For what that guy charges, if I ever bought anything from him I would expect it to be delivered to me in a frickin' limo. ~WalterSobchak
Looks like the seller provided nice big scans. If the card you received matches the card in the scan, I'm not sure what the buyer's gripe is at this point. If there is undisclosed damage, out with it. If not, I stand by my previous comment of buyer's remorse.
<< <i>Steve, I think people are focusing on the right border which is a little crooked towards the bottom.
Like I said, it's not unusual. Here's a PSA 7 with the same cut: >>
My PSA 7 of this card also has a similar cut. Only difference is that it doesn't go quite as far up the border, and it's the lower left corner instead of the right. Mine has a rough cut along the left edge as well.
Also, I'm a little confused. Are you sending the card back, or are you not sending the card back?
'Sir, I realize it's been difficult for you to sleep at night without your EX/MT 1977 Topps Tom Seaver, but I swear to you that you'll get it safe and sound.' -CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
Comments
Thanks again!
WTB: PSA 1 - PSA 3 Centered, High Eye Appeal 1950's Mantle
<< <i>Did you overnight it to PSA? >>
did you get it back from PSA yet
<< <i>Can't wait for the post-submission thread. >>
The centering looks 55/35 to me.
If not, ask for a refund. Good luck.
Robert
<< <i>The card is messed up looking. Ill give it that much. Not to happy with the whole deal to tell the truth. >>
Sounds more like buyer's remorse to me.
You started a thread pretty quickly after purchase to bash the seller (around a holiday), constantly irritating looking for a refund. Now you have the card and your only comment is "card is messed up looking." Let's see a scan. Describe why the card is les than you expected. Its hard to take you too seriously at this point.
<< <i>Let's see a scan. >>
From the BST thread:
http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=11&threadid=633939&STARTPAGE=1
<< <i>It's about time somebody finally sends in Hank for grading.
http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=11&threadid=633939&STARTPAGE=1 >>
Was that non-card picture there when that thread was active??
Working on the following: 1970 Baseball PSA, 1970-1976 Raw, World Series Subsets PSA, 1969 Expansion Teams PSA, Fleer World Series Sets, Texas Rangers Topps Run 1972-1989
----------------------
Successful deals to date: thedudeabides,gameusedhoop,golfcollector,tigerdean,treetop,bkritz, CapeMOGuy,WeekendHacker,jeff8877,backbidder,Salinas,milbroco,bbuckner22,VitoCo1972,ddfamf,gemint,K,fatty macs,waltersobchak,dboneesq
<< <i>
<< <i>It's about time somebody finally sends in Hank for grading.
http://forums.collectors.com/messageview.cfm?catid=11&threadid=633939&STARTPAGE=1 >>
Was that non-card picture there when that thread was active??
OMFG!! lol
<< <i>What could possibly go wrong when you're thinking you're going to get an Aaron rookie described as easily a PSA 6 for $500 Paypal gift. >>
Easily a PSA 6 or 6.5 At least he came down on price.
Same Aaron
~WalterSobchak
My guess? PSA 4.5 or 5.
I sold my six a few months back, it too had the same rough cut.
<< <i>
<< <i>Let's see a scan. >>
From the BST thread:
Looks like the seller provided nice big scans. If the card you received matches the card in the scan, I'm not sure what the buyer's gripe is at this point. If there is undisclosed damage, out with it. If not, I stand by my previous comment of buyer's remorse.
Like I said, it's not unusual. Here's a PSA 7 with the same cut:
<< <i>Steve, I think people are focusing on the right border which is a little crooked towards the bottom.
Like I said, it's not unusual. Here's a PSA 7 with the same cut: >>
My PSA 7 of this card also has a similar cut. Only difference is that it doesn't go quite as far up the border, and it's the lower left corner instead of the right. Mine has a rough cut along the left edge as well.
Also, I'm a little confused. Are you sending the card back, or are you not sending the card back?
-CDs Nuts, 1/20/14
*1956 Topps baseball- 97.4% complete, 7.24 GPA
*Clemente basic set: 85.0% complete, 7.89 GPA