Does anyone have a TrueView picture of a PCGS MS70PL UHR

jessewvu

If so, can you post a picture of it?

vann

You can probably get one browsing the top registry sets.

LanceNewmanOCC

.
.


<< <i>You can probably get one browsing the top registry sets. >>



set registry information/pictures can be priceless

i sure wish more sets would be imaged
.
.

DonWillis

There are several on PCGS Coinfacts.

braddick

It was a simple request.

Here you go:

jessewvu

Thank you for the post. If that coin is PL, how is this one not? Are the die polish lines hurting the coin?

OPA

<< <i>Thank you for the post. If that coin is PL, how is this one not? Are the die polish lines hurting the coin?



>>



Most likely submitted before PCGS gave out the PL designation.

MilesWaits

Lordy! I just salivated all down my low profile camisa!!

There needs to be an early warning system before viewing those HUGE photos of a STUNNING coin.

Miles

illini420

I've looked at maybe 10-15 different UHRs in hand and everyone of them looks PL to me... and yes, i've seen some that are NGC/PCGS certified as PL and they look the same. Don't get it.

Justacommeman

<< <i>I've looked at maybe 10-15 different UHRs in hand and everyone of them looks PL to me... and yes, i've seen some that are NGC/PCGS certified as PL and they look the same. Don't get it. >>



This. MJ

jessewvu

I just don't get it. I have looked at several, and this one blows the socks off of others graded MS70 as far as PL designation goes. Maybe if I resubmit one of the lam coins with this stunner, they'd actually see the difference since apparently, sending in a single one doesn't do the trick.

Anyone have an MS70 that's a dull dog I could borrow for about two weeks?

ricko

Those are beautiful coins..... Cheers, RickO