Is PCGS going certify the 2011 San Fransisco ASE coins?

baddogss

Is PCGS going to certify the San Fransisco minted American Silver Eagles?

I know the folks ATS are. Thanks in advance,

MsMorrisine

apparently they already have.

19Lyds

<< <i>apparently they already have. >>

Huh? Got a little more info?

OPA

<< <i>Is PCGS going to certify the San Fransisco minted American Silver Eagles?

I know the folks ATS are. Thanks in advance, >>



At the tune of several thousand

PCGS certified S.F. ASE's

goldbuffalo

There will be plenty of these. I mean they had to send in and grade a sealed box of 500 !!

ianrussell

Yes, PCGS is certifying the San Francisco Mint Silver Eagles.

Why didn't the Mint use a Mint Mark?

- Ian

Zoins

<< <i>Yes, PCGS is certifying the San Francisco Mint Silver Eagles.

Why didn't the Mint use a Mint Mark?

- Ian >>

I believe it's because the Mint doesn't like to create key date coins any more, similar to how they withheld use of the W mintmark for circulation coins.

For more info see these threads on the 2011-"S" ASE:

* thread 1
* thread 2

baddogss

I like the idea of the S Mint ASE, but out of the holder you can't tell it apart from the P.

As said earlier the mint doesn't want to create key date coins ...

OPA

<< <i>

<< <i>Yes, PCGS is certifying the San Francisco Mint Silver Eagles.

Why didn't the Mint use a Mint Mark?

- Ian >>

I believe it's because the Mint doesn't like to create key date coins any more, similar to how they withheld use of the W mintmark for circulation coins.

For more info see these threads on the 2011-"S" ASE:

* thread 1
* thread 2 >>



Interesting...I had no idea that the Westpoint facility produced "circulating" coins. I was under the impressing that all they do is bullion related coins.

llafoe

<< <i>

<< <i>

<< <i>Yes, PCGS is certifying the San Francisco Mint Silver Eagles.

Why didn't the Mint use a Mint Mark?

- Ian >>

I believe it's because the Mint doesn't like to create key date coins any more, similar to how they withheld use of the W mintmark for circulation coins.

For more info see these threads on the 2011-"S" ASE:

* thread 1
* thread 2 >>



Interesting...I had no idea that the Westpoint facility produced "circulating" coins. I was under the impressing that all they do is bullion related coins. >>



They made a Roosevelt Dime in 1996...

OPA

<< <i>

<< <i>

<< <i>

<< <i>Yes, PCGS is certifying the San Francisco Mint Silver Eagles.

Why didn't the Mint use a Mint Mark?

- Ian >>

I believe it's because the Mint doesn't like to create key date coins any more, similar to how they withheld use of the W mintmark for circulation coins.

For more info see these threads on the 2011-"S" ASE:

* thread 1
* thread 2 >>



Interesting...I had no idea that the Westpoint facility produced "circulating" coins. I was under the impressing that all they do is bullion related coins. >>



They made a Roosevelt Dime in 1996... >>



Forgot about that one...any other ones?

19Lyds

<< <i>Yes, PCGS is certifying the San Francisco Mint Silver Eagles.

Why didn't the Mint use a Mint Mark?

- Ian >>

Probably for the same reason that West Point doesn't use a mint mark on the bullion they crank out.

I guess I'm not surprised that the top two are labeling these. On the plus side, it brings them up to speed with SGS who has been labeling SAE's as "No W Mintmark" for years.

Whatever.

Zoins

<< <i>

<< <i>

<< <i>

<< <i>

<< <i>Yes, PCGS is certifying the San Francisco Mint Silver Eagles.

Why didn't the Mint use a Mint Mark?

- Ian >>

I believe it's because the Mint doesn't like to create key date coins any more, similar to how they withheld use of the W mintmark for circulation coins.

For more info see these threads on the 2011-"S" ASE:

* thread 1
* thread 2 >>

Interesting...I had no idea that the Westpoint facility produced "circulating" coins. I was under the impressing that all they do is bullion related coins. >>

They made a Roosevelt Dime in 1996... >>

Forgot about that one...any other ones? >>

Some others from the 70s and 80s are listed in the linked threads

It's plausible that a number of the W minted coins have a low mintage (<500,000) which could create a key date, but by withholding the mintmark, collectors either don't realize they exist or cannot identify them even if they know about their existence. The result is that the Mint can use branch mints to assist in production without creating key date coins which could disrupt demand for their premium collector products. Collecting moderns would be more interesting if the Mint would just used mint marks and created key dates when needed.

It could be interesting to make a FOIA request for the West Point circulation mintage figures to see how many key dates there might have been.

INXS

Will the SF ASE command a premium in the future? It looks like APMEX is charging $10 more currently.