A Buff, A Walker or a Commem -- which would you choose, part II
breakdown
Posts: 2,258 ✭✭✭✭✭
Well, I did this once before and found the results surprising and even learned a thing or two. So one more time, I am posting three coins of similar price. Which would you choose (if any) and if possible provide your thinking.
First, the Buffalo:
Next, the Walker:
And, finally, the California:
Thanks to Todd for the images.
First, the Buffalo:
Next, the Walker:
And, finally, the California:
Thanks to Todd for the images.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
0
Comments
Next, I'd take the Walker... it's personally my fav. coin series... the toning is very nice (i like the reverse) but doesn't move me like the CA... granted, any colorfully toned Walker is not something you see all the time...
Lastly, the Buffalo... i'm just not a big nickel guy... lots of other coins i'd buy in this price range before the Buff
It is nicely toned and it's a 67.
The Walker is nice too but I prefer the California commem.
I am not a big fan of Buffalo nickels. They are attractive coins, just not my thing.
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
PS- if I gotta pick just one it might have to be the commem.
EAC 6024
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
The Buffalo is a tie for best of show and I could be happy with either coin.
The WLH, is just a slightly above average so so coin. It is my opinion
that the Buffalo is probably the best long term investment of ones money.
Camelot
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
Not a fan of coins not intended to circulate and also do not care for the commem toning. Buffalo is nice but doesn't catch my attention much. Walker just looks like a tough, handsome and beautiful example of a classic design and big coin.
Take you pick as far as the other two go.
(IMHO)
Luv the Buffalo. Was that just graded ?
Everybody's got plans--until they get hit
--Mike Tyson
The reverse toning of the California is some of the nicest on any coin I own. By Todd's images, the toning of the two sides looks similar but in hand with the ability to tilt the coin, the reverse really stands out. As many pointed out, there is a hit on the obverse that is barely discernible without a loupe but of course once you notice it, it is always there. So I like the Commem but it has a flaw.
Similarly, the Walker has a few negatives. The reverse toning is nice but quite dark (probably too dark for some). Even more, the obverse central strike is weak (look at the head and hand). I almost traded out of this coin last year but I do like the unique look and decided to hold onto it for now.
For me, the Buffalo is the nicest of the three. Great luster and a really clean look in a tan-orange shade that I think looks great. This coin really does not have any problems and would therefore rank highest for me. Thanks again for all the comments.
Edit: Sorry, to answer 66WhiteFBL's question, the Buff was graded in 2010.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
Menomonee Falls Wisconsin USA
http://www.pcgs.com/SetRegistr...dset.aspx?s=68269&ac=1">Musky 1861 Mint Set
l recently sold a roll of common date buffs that turned dull over time, and I am always amazed that a nickel could stay that lustrous ... amazing.
Commems and Early Type
Buff
California
In that order.
The Walker just jumps out to me. Love the colors, good strike.
The Buff is real nice, but I like the color of the Walker better.
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.