Options
Oregon Trail Commemorative
Is there a preferred collectible year or mint mark for the OTC? I didn't realize they were minted with some many dates.
John
John
0
Comments
<< <i>The 1933D would appear to be the most valued specimen - first commemorative struck at the Denver mint. Cheers, RickO >>
The 28-P and 34-D are also better dates, personally I also like the 36-S which isn't seen very often.
Heck I like the coin maybe best of all. Has a real story behind it as do most of
Early Commemoratives. The making of America Commemoratives are our True
History. Any year is fine with me. I may just start putting that set together.
I don't think this is a "preferred year" but I like it anyhow.
How about the 1939 P, D, and S?
<< <i>Is there a preferred collectible year or mint mark for the OTC? I didn't realize they were minted with some many dates.
John >>
If you're looking for one, don't worry about what date it is - let the coin come to you, based on how it looks.
<< <i>
I don't think this is a "preferred year" but I like it anyhow. >>
Based on how it looks I'd let that coin come to me lcoopie.
(hat tip to cg1)
"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso
<< <i>
<< <i>
I don't think this is a "preferred year" but I like it anyhow. >>
Based on how it looks I'd let that coin come to me lcoopie.
(hat tip to cg1) >>
That's what I was talking about. If/when you see a coin like that, if it is priced reasonably, who cares what date it is?
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Oregon Trails are sure are pretty..
Nothing like the coinage of today.
Bruce
I have started to put together a full set of Oregons. Have about half the issues. Looking for original skin . . . that 'pewter' look they come with so often when un-messed with. Before I die I want to take a full set up there on the Trail and get a photo . . .when done, I'll post.
Great commem . . . .
Drunner
<< <i>
<< <i>Is there a preferred collectible year or mint mark for the OTC? I didn't realize they were minted with some many dates.
John >>
If you're looking for one, don't worry about what date it is - let the coin come to you, based on how it looks. >>
The most interesting Oregons have a great look to them. Go for the look, not the date / mm.
Hoard the keys.
Coin's for sale/trade.
Tom Pilitowski
US Rare Coin Investments
800-624-1870
==Looking for pre WW2 Commems in PCGS Rattler holders, 1851-O Three Cent Silvers in all grades
Successful, problem free and pleasant transactions with: illini420, coinguy1, weather11am,wayneherndon,wondercoin,Topdollarpaid,Julian, bishdigg,seateddime, peicesofme,ajia,CoinRaritiesOnline,savoyspecial,Boom, TorinoCobra71, ModernCoinMart, WTCG, slinc, Patches, Gerard, pocketpiececommems, BigJohnD, RickMilauskas, mirabella, Smittys, LeeG, TomB, DeusExMachina, tydye
Ron
<< <i>I also agree with MJ that's it's nice to have a toned reverse. What's cooler that a rainbow covered wagon staring at you! >>
Hello my friend! Here's your pic and welcome to the boards dude............. MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Being present, my impression was that it didn't sell. Having inspected it, I was quite confused at to why the strike was weak and wasn't crazy about the "look", but few if any of the few other matte proofs have the "look" other than the clearly official Hawaiian issues.
The rest is OT.
The Columbians are brilliants. I've seen more than one '93 that many, as do I, believe is a proof, but the services take Swiatek's stance that only one '93 was made and Tony has scholarship on his side.
Many disagree about current attributions of Isabellas
BTW Breen's attributions of various proof and/or specimen commems hold little to no currency among many current aficionados/experts.
Rumor has it the Stacks' Baltimore sale will have two Boone matte proofs. The proof classic commems should be a separate thread. There are more. Mr. Sinnock sure had fun. What I have to say about the holdered Sesqui $2 1/2 may be legally actionable.
<< <i>
<< <i>Is there a preferred collectible year or mint mark for the OTC? I didn't realize they were minted with some many dates.
John >>
If you're looking for one, don't worry about what date it is - let the coin come to you, based on how it looks. >>
Yes, buy the coin not the date and mint mark. Most commemorative coin type collectors (looking to do a 50 piece set) don't care about the rarity as much as they do the eye appeal. In fact they would prefer to buy a nice looking coin for less, than a more expensive scarcer date.
<< <i>I think you get for bang for your money with 37-D. Most come nice. However, with Oregons you can be patient and just grab the best piece regardless of year or mint mark when in rolls around. JMHO. MJ
Hey MJ, that is one super duper piece you have there, show off!! Love the color and the strike is over the top!!