Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Is “numeric grading” destructive to the hobby?

Is “numeric grading” destructive to the hobby?

The adoption of numeric grading – the association of a number from the Sheldon large cent world to other coin types – was initially promoted by ANA governor Virgil H. Since then, this system has expanded and become accepted by the hobby, even though it has a great many faults and fallacies.

Some of the difficulties include:
A. Non-linear scale – each “point” is not equal to another
B. Arbitrary point spreads within descriptive grades
C. Absence of accepted definition of each numeric moniker
D. Numeric bias where accuracy is implied but actually absent
E. Creation of phantom “grades” that did not previously exist (AU-53 or AU-55 for example)
F. Lack of repeatability
G. Application of discrete quantities to a continuum

As active modern day coin collectors what do you think?

Comments

  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,206 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It may be destructive to the hobby but is very profitable to the business.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,747 ✭✭✭✭✭
    RWB - While there are flaws in the system, it's not clear to me that the system is destructive. Care to expound on that?
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    coinguy1coinguy1 Posts: 13,484 ✭✭✭
    I'm not sure if it's destructive or not. But either way, I don't see any practical alternatives that would be better.
  • Options
    mrpotatoheaddmrpotatoheadd Posts: 7,576 ✭✭✭
    The fact that numbers are involved is not necessarily an indictment of the system. Example:

    F. Lack of repeatability

    Does anybody really think that grading would be more easily repeatable if a numerical system was not used? Any grading system can be "destructive" if applied based on erroneous assumptions regarding the way the system is intended to operate.
  • Options
    BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Much as been said about Democracy. "A poor system......except for all the others."

    In truth, numerical TPG has made the hobby more friendly to the collector. While it

    is not perfect it is much better then what has gone before.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,873 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I can’t see where the Sheldon number grading system is destructive. I’ve been in this hobby long enough (over 50 years) to know about the abuses that took place when no numbers were used and only words were provided to grade coins. If you read some of the flowery, imprecise garbage that used to be used to describe grades, you would be most pleased with the current numeric system despite its faults.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not sure what is meant by "the hobby"

    any more than I understand references to "the economy" or "the environment" as if it was one uniform thing.

    so, in answer, IMO numeric grading is a tool that is variously well-used or much abused, and everyting in between, in different situations.

    as are a number of measurements of money supply, inflation, pollution, or temperature..

    depending on who you ask and what they want you to think

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • Options
    LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Are we only going to collect face value coins? Don't think so.
  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,100 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't think numeric grading hurts the hobby as much as those little lies that squeeze people out of their wealth in other cracks and crevices in the game. Unlike Bill Jones, I ran from the hobby for 30 years because of the deceit I discovered early, otherwise I'd have almost 50 yrs experience.
  • Options
    IGWTIGWT Posts: 4,975
    Are you asking about "numeric grading" or about "third-party grading"?
  • Options
    SaorAlbaSaorAlba Posts: 7,593 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Only if you let it be. Frankly I could care less what someone else's opinion is of a coin. I really only buy stuff usually - and rarely ever sell. I am a collector, I am not an investor and I have never bought coins for investment purposes. In fact I have lost money on some coins and made money on others. But more importantly I have a wealth of knowledge of history and appreciation for art from having endeavoured in my childhood to pursue this hobby.
  • Options
    BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    To survive and thrive one must do the following:

    1. Learn how to spot coins that are PQ for the grade

    2. Better yet, learn how to grade ,to a reasonable degree,
    on the coin series you collect.

    3. Develop a trusted circle of dealers that are fair, reasonable
    honorable and with whom you can develop a good relationship

    4. Never buy expensive coins at auction without having
    professional dealer you trust check it out for you.

    5.If you frequent our excellent B/S/T, learn who the long term honorable
    collectors are. These fine folks will always do what ever it takes to make you happy.

    6. On E-Bay, I tend to return frequently, to dealers who deliver what they promise
    time after time.These are the people that give good, pleasant service and stand behind
    every coin that they sell.

    7. Always question why valuable coins are not in a reputable slab.

    8. If you have a question about a coin, never be afraid to ask it of the Forum Members. Post a
    picture and ask your question. While it is difficult to grade a coin from a picture, our astute
    members can often pick out clues to a damaged or doctored coin. They also have a pretty good
    idea as to coin values in most grades.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I collect coins, not numbers. Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Long ago, I knew a few people who ran numbers.image
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,100 ✭✭✭✭✭
    After I crunch the numbers, I submit coins for a grade. Two reasons: Business & pleasure, and that's all because of a hobby where I don't have to worry about OSHA, .... yet image
  • Options
    RYKRYK Posts: 35,801 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>It may be destructive to the hobby but is very profitable to the business. >>



    You took the words right out of my mouth. image
  • Options
    coinkatcoinkat Posts: 24,492 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not really- there are bigger problems

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,100 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image

    image
    What is most destructive isn't the numerical gradek but the lack of interest in collecting coin even at WalMart prices.
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,594 ✭✭✭✭✭
    RWB---What kind of grading standard do you propose?

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    RWBRWB Posts: 8,082
    I'm just asking the question for now....Lots of interesting responses here and on NGC's board.
  • Options
    dohdoh Posts: 6,457 ✭✭✭
    *sigh*....no.
    Positive BST transactions with: too many names to list! 36 at last count.
  • Options
    leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think most people lose it when they discover another coin in same grade holder that looks 10x worse than the coin they just forked $40 over to get certified. That basically did it for me anyways and the fact that the strike of a coin was not even factored into the grade whatsoever. I didn't need someone telling me which coins were shinier or prettier than the others. image


    Leo

    But rejoining the certification road may change once I get a better understanding of the stickers and pluses, depended upon the criterias and how they are used to boost the collector base.

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file