Can someone please explain how...
![thisnamztaken](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/userpics/079/nW82EQF2GBBP5.jpg)
this Peace Dollar received a grade of MS-64 by NGC?
It appears to have been held between a greasy thumb and forefinger, skidded across a chicken coop floor, retrieved a week later from under a layer of hen manure, and then submitted for slabbing! If this belongs to a member here, please forgive my bit of sarcasm, but I just don't understand this grade.![image](http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j165/thisnamztaken/em10.gif)
It appears to have been held between a greasy thumb and forefinger, skidded across a chicken coop floor, retrieved a week later from under a layer of hen manure, and then submitted for slabbing! If this belongs to a member here, please forgive my bit of sarcasm, but I just don't understand this grade.
![image](http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j165/thisnamztaken/em10.gif)
I never thought that growing old would happen so fast.
- Jim
- Jim
0
Comments
www.brunkauctions.com
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I think I'll pass, thank you.
Lafayette Grading Set
.........NO CAC FOR YOU!
If it was AT to being with, how did it turn in its holder? I thought holders were air tight? I know TPG's like to say toned coins are stable, but if it turned in the holder, isnt there a bigger problem?
it may have been AT or NT but it surely continued to tone in the holder from previous exposure from something
when NGC saw it, they felt it was a 64 - we all seem to agree that now it is ugly and would not make it today if submitted looking like that
<< <i><<I believe that coin is from a group of known AT Peace dollars, all bearing a common serial number prefix. It must have turned in its holder.>>
If it was AT to being with, how did it turn in its holder? I thought holders were air tight? I know TPG's like to say toned coins are stable, but if it turned in the holder, isnt there a bigger problem? >>
You are incorrect. Many coins turn in holders. Holders are not air tight, and no one has ever claimed so.
<< <i>
<< <i><<I believe that coin is from a group of known AT Peace dollars, all bearing a common serial number prefix. It must have turned in its holder.>>
If it was AT to being with, how did it turn in its holder? I thought holders were air tight? I know TPG's like to say toned coins are stable, but if it turned in the holder, isnt there a bigger problem? >>
You are incorrect. Many coins turn in holders. Holders are not air tight, and no one has ever claimed so. >>
It's not just a matter of whether or not the holder is airtight. If the coin had chemicals, like dipping solution residue on it when it when into the holder, it will tone and continue to tone. Also some AT juck just does not stop a certain point. It keeps eating the medal, sometimes until the coin turns black if it's silver.
<< <i><<I believe that coin is from a group of known AT Peace dollars, all bearing a common serial number prefix. It must have turned in its holder.>>
If it was AT to being with, how did it turn in its holder? I thought holders were air tight? I know TPG's like to say toned coins are stable, but if it turned in the holder, isnt there a bigger problem? >>
1. No holders aren't airtight.
2. The chemical reactions that cause toning don't necessarily need air although often the chemicals that cause them are transported in the air.
3. The thought is that if a coin is ATd today and graded tomorrow the chemical process may not be fully stabilized at that time, thus it may change in the holder.
4. With so many people not realizing that holders aren't airtight, I'm surprised we don't see more slabs full of water from people washing them in the sink.
--Jerry
<< <i>They surely have a way of figuring out which grader was responsible for that one. >>
All grading from TPG's is consensus grading meaning that more than two graders must agree on the grade in addition to the grading finalizer. In other words, no one individual is responsible for any single graded coin. The TPG is.
The name is LEE!
no sympathy for anyone who would pay for that grade
I am not even sure that I am not fake too.
Camelot
Note: I am not saying that this should or should not be an NGC MS-64. I don't collect the series and have no idea how it should grade. All I am saying is that the toning should be irrelevant to the grade.
"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso
Below is a 1928 Peace I purchased about 10 years ago in a PCGS holder. It was tone free and freshly holdered. After about a year it looked like this. Obviously the coin was dipped and not rinsed/neutralized properly. In this case it was a dipped coin but AT'd coins that get through are often not stable and turn to crap as well.
<< <i>Same way this one is a 64. Yes I am the seller of this Link >>
I've added you to my "favorite sellers" list.
I'll be asking for favors, too.
<< <i>
<< <i>Same way this one is a 64. Yes I am the seller of this Link >>
I've added you to my "favorite sellers" list.
I'll be asking for favors, too.
Hey! You have two bids already. Get rid of that sucker......and hope the buyer sees it for what it is and doesn't try to return it.
<< <i>Ugly should have nothing to do with 64. Neither should pretty. The coin grades whatever it does regardless of the toning...
.... the toning should be irrelevant to the grade. >>
I agree, and so does my copy of the ANA Grading Standards guide.
I'll call it BUT, butt ugly toner.
<< <i>Ugly should have nothing to do with 64. Neither should pretty. The coin grades whatever it does regardless of the toning. >>
Not true as long as eye appeal is a grading factor.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>
<< <i>Ugly should have nothing to do with 64. Neither should pretty. The coin grades whatever it does regardless of the toning. >>
Not true as long as eye appeal is a grading factor. >>
No, eye appeal is a PRICING factor. Of course, since the TPGs do price rather than grade coins....
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Ugly should have nothing to do with 64. Neither should pretty. The coin grades whatever it does regardless of the toning. >>
Not true as long as eye appeal is a grading factor. >>
No, eye appeal is a PRICING factor. Of course, since the TPGs do price rather than grade coins.... >>
Yup. The TPG's assign market grades rather than technical grades. Right or wrong, it's the way things are in the coin industry.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
ME NO LIKEY...
How did that grade 64?????? YUCK!