Depends on the standard by which you apply the term "good" to a collector.
"Please help us keep these boards professional and informative…. And fun." - DW --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BONGO HURTLES ALONG THE RAIN SODDEN HIGHWAY OF LIFE ON UNDERINFLATED BALD RETREAD TIRES
<< <i>Do you think Eliasberg would have been nearly as succesful if he made only a middle class income? >>
Successful and good are too entirely different things. Your topic says "good collector" which has absolutely nothing to do with money. Being a "successful collector" is different to everybody. I'm extremely successful as a collector and I don't have a lot of money. I'm not trying to build a complete set of U.S. coinage either, so perhaps in the Eliasberg sense I'm not successful, which is fine as I don't have that goal.
Basically, your question has no answer as there are too many variables.
Positive BST transactions with: too many names to list! 36 at last count.
I think you can put together a good collection on any budget, even a small one. If you have a good eye than you will quickly find yourself spotting bargains and pq coins all over the place. All you have to do is just work your way up from there. We have all heard the stories of forum members picking off $10,000 coins for $10 so money is not necessary but definitely helps.
PS. I used to have lots of money when I was younger but no skill so I bought all types of junk and probably wasted thousands but now I have much less money to spend but my skills have increased and I make much smarter purchases and the few quality pieces I have in my collection make it much more enjoyable than having plenty of junk.
To be a quality numismatist it doesn't take money -- just practice, education and the development of a good eye for good coins. It takes money to build most world-class collections, but you can still be a solid numismatist without a bottomless wallet.
It's easier for a person of modest means to become a good collector. A limited budget imposes discipline, fosters creativity, and encourages intelligent decisions.
There are many kinds of collectors. A guy that goes through his pocket change can be a good collector, that may just be collecting within his means. The collection might never be worth much, but you didn't specify investment grade collections. Does it take skill to save your pocket change? Not too much, but some may find it enjoyable. Skill comes into play when trading, purchasing, or selling coins all of which are not necessarily required to be a collector. So is skill or money needed to be a "good" collector, I'd have to say not much of either. Kinda like collecting cans from the side of the road.
If the question was worded to obtain a good collection... I'd have to say a bit of both.
It takes a "good" collector to create a quality collection at any level of investment. To create a clasically great or a world class collection, you have to be "good" (or surroung yourself with good people) and you have to have the major money.
<< <i>It's easier for a person of modest means to become a good collector. A limited budget imposes discipline, fosters creativity, and encourages intelligent decisions. >>
<< <i>It's easier for a person of modest means to become a good collector. A limited budget imposes discipline, fosters creativity, and encourages intelligent decisions. >>
I really like this answer. >>
I have a problem with it actually. Most people who have money earned it the hard way or know what it took to earn it, and there is a reason they still have money. It's only the few spoiled children of those who earned it that give most well-to-do people the bad reputation of just throwing money around.
That's not to say there aren't some collectors who have more money than sense, but for the most part, most of the well-funded collectors I've met are pretty savy!
The bottom line is that to be a good collector, it doesn't matter how much money you have. To build a head turning "collection" however, it is much easier to do if you have money. Many confuse being a "good" collector with having a "good" [head-turning or world-class] collection.
Want to buy an auction catalog for the William Hesslein Sale (December 2, 1926). Thanks to all those who have helped us obtain the others!!!
I do believe that a certain amount of capital needs to be invested, regardless of how astute you may be. Pittman is oft-quoted, but many here have equal skills but less capital.
Many mid-range collectors on these Boards possess the knowledge but perhaps not the capital to venture out and grab each opportune rarity.
Being a "good collector" has nothing to do with value. It also has nothing to do with quality. It has to do with a desire to collect. My cat is a "good collector" and has never spent a dime. She is also just as likely exert the same amount of skill while trying to aquire a cull coin from my pocket change as she is a 4 figure bust half from my collection.
Just because I'm old doesn't mean I don't love to look at a pretty bust.
It take skill-for an example if you had a lot of money and no skill,you would not be able to tell if a coin is fake or real(some are really cheasy though)and you would spend that money on a bunch of fakes
<< <i>It take skill-for an example if you had a lot of money and no skill,you would not be able to tell if a coin is fake or real(some are really cheasy though)and you would spend that money on a bunch of fakes >>
That's what slabs and stickers are for. Consultants are for the rest.
I think we still need the OP's precise definition of "good" to give a definitive answer.
Meanwhile, let me just say that you may have the skill to be able to discern which of the two raw 1794 F-12 Flowing Hair Dollars sitting in a dealer's case is fake and which is genuine, but without enough money to purchase the genuine one you're still going home without it!
I never thought that growing old would happen so fast. - Jim
An idiot could spend a million dollars on a few tons of VG Wheat Cents from the 40s and 50s and essentially wind up with a near valueless collection.
A skilled collector could spend a few hundred on a couple of better date and key coins and have a far better collection. >>
Why is that skilled collector's collection far better than the "idiot's"? The ability to sell that collection at a profit has absolutely nothing to do with the quality (or lack of quality) of said collection, merely with the quality of a monetary investment.
Just because I'm old doesn't mean I don't love to look at a pretty bust.
Obviously some combination of both, you are not going to build much of a collection without some resources, and your resources will serve you to no avail if you use them stupidly.
Comments
Lets define the collecting objectives here...
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
<< <i>Do you think Eliasberg would have been nearly as succesful if he made only a middle class income? >>
Pittman was
Put ALL profits in a high end personal collection.
It really does work .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BONGO HURTLES ALONG THE RAIN SODDEN HIGHWAY OF LIFE ON UNDERINFLATED BALD RETREAD TIRES
<< <i>
<< <i>Do you think Eliasberg would have been nearly as succesful if he made only a middle class income? >>
Pittman was >>
Good Point!
<< <i>Do you think Eliasberg would have been nearly as succesful if he made only a middle class income? >>
Successful and good are too entirely different things. Your topic says "good collector" which has absolutely nothing to do with money. Being a "successful collector" is different to everybody. I'm extremely successful as a collector and I don't have a lot of money. I'm not trying to build a complete set of U.S. coinage either, so perhaps in the Eliasberg sense I'm not successful, which is fine as I don't have that goal.
Basically, your question has no answer as there are too many variables.
PS. I used to have lots of money when I was younger but no skill so I bought all types of junk and probably wasted thousands but now I have much less money to spend but my skills have increased and I make much smarter purchases and the few quality pieces I have in my collection make it much more enjoyable than having plenty of junk.
The collections were of different qualities though.....
<< <i>You can be a good collector with just money and zero skill....as long as you are smart enough to hire the right advisor. >>
Of couse the question here is whether it is the advisor that is the good collector with the owner being a patron and steward.
<< <i>You can be a good collector with just money and zero skill....as long as you are smart enough to hire the right advisor. >>
Wut that guy just said.
If the question was worded to obtain a good collection... I'd have to say a bit of both.
<< <i>It's easier for a person of modest means to become a good collector. A limited budget imposes discipline, fosters creativity, and encourages intelligent decisions. >>
I really like this answer.
<< <i>
<< <i>It's easier for a person of modest means to become a good collector. A limited budget imposes discipline, fosters creativity, and encourages intelligent decisions. >>
I really like this answer. >>
I have a problem with it actually. Most people who have money earned it the hard way or know what it took to earn it, and there is a reason they still have money. It's only the few spoiled children of those who earned it that give most well-to-do people the bad reputation of just throwing money around.
That's not to say there aren't some collectors who have more money than sense, but for the most part, most of the well-funded collectors I've met are pretty savy!
The bottom line is that to be a good collector, it doesn't matter how much money you have. To build a head turning "collection" however, it is much easier to do if you have money. Many confuse being a "good" collector with having a "good" [head-turning or world-class] collection.
I do believe that a certain amount of capital needs to be invested, regardless of how astute you may be. Pittman is oft-quoted, but many here have equal skills but less capital.
Many mid-range collectors on these Boards possess the knowledge but perhaps not the capital to venture out and grab each opportune rarity.
Both are needed.
Drunner
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
I think a good eye is equally important.
More so than money.
Camelot
<< <i>It take skill-for an example if you had a lot of money and no skill,you would not be able to tell if a coin is fake or real(some are really cheasy though)and you would spend that money on a bunch of fakes >>
That's what slabs and stickers are for. Consultants are for the rest.
An idiot could spend a million dollars on a few tons of VG Wheat Cents from the 40s and 50s and essentially wind up with a near valueless collection.
A skilled collector could spend a few hundred on a couple of better date and key coins and have a far better collection.
Meanwhile, let me just say that you may have the skill to be able to discern which of the two raw 1794 F-12 Flowing Hair Dollars sitting in a dealer's case is fake and which is genuine, but without enough money to purchase the genuine one you're still going home without it!
- Jim
Be it a collection out of pocket change or date runs of Saints.
Be it a YN with a 6 year old Red book and a few blue punch boards.
Be it a millionair with a world class library and a vault full of patterns and keys.
Both collections are equally important to there owners ... with a real feeling of pride.
********************
Silver is the mortar that binds the bricks of loyalty.
<< <i>IMHO: Far more skill than money
An idiot could spend a million dollars on a few tons of VG Wheat Cents from the 40s and 50s and essentially wind up with a near valueless collection.
A skilled collector could spend a few hundred on a couple of better date and key coins and have a far better collection. >>
Why is that skilled collector's collection far better than the "idiot's"? The ability to sell that collection at a profit has absolutely nothing to do with the quality (or lack of quality) of said collection, merely with the quality of a monetary investment.
<< <i>It does not take money to be a good collector. >>
How can it not take money to collect money,
by definition you have to have money to collect money
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
<< <i>
<< <i>It does not take money to be a good collector. >>
How can it not take money to collect money,
by definition you have to have money to collect money >>
OK, point taken.
(note: I wrote this without reading not one post, now I'm curious)
"Keep your malarkey filter in good operating order" -Walter Breen
knowledge and confidence in self-- " the more you know the less you will pay" from a famous coin dealer.
John Pittman had a middle class income . Mortgaged his house to buy King Farouk rareties, made millions when sold.
http://www.raregold.com/r-cns5.htm
krueger