Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Are you willing to forgive a few hits in prime focal areas if a coin is bleeding with luster???

I am pretty picky with most coins I buy....but I am a sucker for bright, natural luster. If I find 2 coins one grade different and the lower grade has that lustery "look".....I will choose it over the higher grade 99% of the time.

Comments

  • lope208lope208 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭
    I think it really depends on the coin and how prominent the hits are.
    A nice lustrous coin can make even a smaller hit stand out.

    Got any recent examples you can show us to compare?
    Successful BST transactions:
    commoncents123, JrGMan2004, Coll3ctor (2), Dabigkahuna, BAJJERFAN, Boom, GRANDAM, newsman, cohodk, kklambo, seateddime, ajia, mirabela, Weather11am, keepdachange, gsa1fan, cone10
    -------------------------
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    No, because over time the hits will appear to grow

    until they are all you can see. They will eventually

    look like the Grand Canyon.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • This content has been removed.
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    I could not say yes or no without seeing the coin.
  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭
    Lots of grader do.

    My opinion is that if the hits bother you then no amount of luster will distract from them................. although sometimes its pretty close!
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Are you willing to forgive a few hits in prime focal areas if a coin is bleeding with luster??? >>



    Probably not.
  • No, I won't buy any w/hits in prime areas. I have what you would consider a 66 morgan, but there is a long 'ding' on her cheek down her neck. When I see it from a distance
    it's stunning, but up close it's 'gee that's too bad'.. Fortunately, it came cheap, and the reverse is 65 or 66.
  • ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,684 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If a coin has an eye-catching nick or carbon spot in a prime focal area, I don't want it. I'm talking about something I can see with the naked eye.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,793 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Usually I don't buy coins with obvious marks. I am often willing to trade some luster for smooth surfaces. Here's coin that is as close to an exception to that rule that I have in my collection. The 1907 Low Relief St. Gaudens $20 gold is a common coin, but most of the examples I've seen tend to be on the dull side. This one made into a PCGS MS-65 holder, mostly for its great luster IMO. There is a bag mark on the reverse that is well hidden in the eagle's feathers that is "un MS-65 like" IMO, but the coin's overall luster "sold" the piece to me.

    imageimage
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭


    << <i>If a coin has an eye-catching nick or carbon spot in a prime focal area, I don't want it. I'm talking about something I can see with the naked eye. >>



    If it's a great rarity then you may have to take what you can get, but if it's a coin I can replace on Tuesday then I'm going to be considerably more selective.
  • yes, absolutely
    "Wars are really ugly! They're dirty
    and they're cold.
    I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
    Mary






    Best Franklin Website
  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,868 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It really depends on the coin and the marks, but yeah, I'm a sucker for luster, too. Luster trumps strike in my book- I'll take a coin with a somewhat smushier strike if it has loads of luster to compensate.

    As to marks, it depends on how distracting they are.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,304 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd forgive the hits for color, but not for luster/shininess.
    theknowitalltroll;
  • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
    I take in the whole coin. I collect only mint state coins. Originality with luster is what I look for over all else. If a coin has some hits I really don't care much.
  • PawPaulPawPaul Posts: 5,845
    I think PCGS , far more then NGC - makes this a practice
  • ambro51ambro51 Posts: 13,949 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The thing you begin to mentally ignore as the owner of the coin is the first thing you hear about from a prospective buyer.
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,830 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Luster is nice but minimal marks are a necessity. I can live with less than blast luster but I can't stand heavy marks especially in prime focal areas. Heavy marks are just another form of damage IMO.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,200 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Depends on the price. image
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    yes.

    i would much rather have a coin with a booming luster bloom and a few hits than vice-a-vers-a.
  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,553 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Two thoughts come to mind here:
    1. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, ugly is in the eye of everyone.
    2. Cindy Crawford does have a mole on her face. Doesn't make her ugly, though.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    If we were to gather a consensus of Forum Members , as

    to which of 10 coins of similar Grade, Grading company and

    same type and series of coin, we would probably gain a clear

    and unmistakable preference, as to which coins are superior.
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,830 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Two thoughts come to mind here:
    1. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, ugly is in the eye of everyone.
    2. Cindy Crawford does have a mole on her face. Doesn't make her ugly, though. >>



    She has a face? Never noticed.image

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • MidLifeCrisisMidLifeCrisis Posts: 10,550 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Obviously it depends on the coin, but I'm with CCU...probably not.

    Those hits in the prime focal areas would start to be all I would see when I looked at the coin.
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    I can't deal in absolutes like this. I'd have to see the coin.
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,587 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If it grabs my attention, it will grab another's, so in this regard : Yes I am willing and able.

    Don't taze me bro image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file