Ichiro: 200+ Hits In 8 Straight Seasons ...
JackWESQ
Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭
in Sports Talk
Ichiro got his 200th hit tonight. This is 200+ hits in 8 straight seasons and 1792 hits for his career. Do you think he wants/has the ability to stick around for 6 more seasons to reach 3000? To be sure, if he retired after the 2010 season (his 10th season), I think he easily walks into the HOF.
/s/ JackWESQ
P.S. (You need to play at least 10 seasons to be eligible for the HOF.)
/s/ JackWESQ
P.S. (You need to play at least 10 seasons to be eligible for the HOF.)
0
Comments
5.......4.........3.........2.......1......
Steve
I've seen him hit balls HARD, right to the shortstop, and still beat the throw.
Is anyone better with the stick with a 0-2 count? Nope.
Dave
pretty anemic for extra base hits. doesnt walk a lot. single digit homers, barely 20 doubles.
JS
<< <i>It's a shame they don't count all the hits he had in Japan... >>
If MLB did that, they'd also have to count Julio Franco's hits over there!
Steve
Congrats Ichi!
Dave
awesome
<< <i>He's still HOF in my book. >>
+1
<< <i>It's a shame they don't count all the hits he had in Japan... >>
The Pacific League did count all his hits. And it is very easy to find out exactly how many were counted
Not Hall-of-Fame level yet, but he is starting to come very close
Reminds me of what Boggs could have done if he would not have been in the minors for so many years before he got to play in the big show.
Dave
Currently working on:
1955 Topps All-American
George Brett Master Set
2009 A&G's
What's the difference? The only difference I see is that it gets you closer
to scoring position. With Ichiro, he just steals second after a single anyways
and then scores. He's had over 100 runs scored EVERY season too and will
do it again this year.
He's a lead-off hitter guys. Get on base and score is his job.....and he does
it better than anyone else. Oh yea, he plays a pretty good outfield too.
Great player........YES
HOFer..................YES
wpkoughan@yahoo.com
Collecting 1970-1979 PSA 9 & 10 Baseball Cards
If that makes sense.
The guy is a hit machine and like mentioned above can play the heck of an outfield too.
HOF'r? Perhaps, he is well on his way.
Stve
<< <i>he just steals second after a single anyways
and then scores. He's had over 100 runs scored EVERY season too and will
do it again this year.
He's a lead-off hitter guys. Get on base and score is his job.....and he does
it better than anyone else. Oh yea, he plays a pretty good outfield too.
Great player........YES
HOFer..................YES >>
Nope. The writers didn't come close to inducting Tim Raines. . .
Ichiro has done it every single year.
Edit: Wanted to make sure I was right and yes I was...........
Raines never had a 200 hit season. Also, Ichiro was ROY, MVP,
and has already been an all-star more times in his brief 8 yr
career than Raines was in his 20 yr career.
Now back to the original thread.........congrats to Ichiro on an
incredible accomplishment.
wpkoughan@yahoo.com
Collecting 1970-1979 PSA 9 & 10 Baseball Cards
When did Ichiro ever have a season with 70 walks?
I thought you were pointing out that Tim Raines did
the same things as Ichiro and since Raines is not in the
HOF, neither should Ichiro. I was trying to show how you
focused on just 1 minute aspect (as you did again using
Rickey & Teddy Ballgame) and that Ichiro outshines Raines
in so many other categories.
Point is that Ichiro is the best lead-off hitter in the game today
and is a better player than Raines was. I will concede however
that those Ricky and Teddy guys were better than both.
wpkoughan@yahoo.com
Collecting 1970-1979 PSA 9 & 10 Baseball Cards
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
Except for the fact that both could hit a single and then steal a base?
Raines had power, deserves to be in the hall yet I do not see the comparison (s)
Steve
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
Actually I said "get on base AND score"
so to say Raines was better in that aspect
is incorrect.
wpkoughan@yahoo.com
Collecting 1970-1979 PSA 9 & 10 Baseball Cards
Overall, his hitting stats when you take into account OBP %, OPS %, etc. are better than Ichiro's. It also should not be held against Raines that he played his best seasons on some very bad Expos clubs that had great difficulty bringing him home from second base. Runs scored, to that extent, is more a reflection of his teammates' ability than the ability of Tim Raines as a player. Raines also had much more power than Ichiro has, too, despite playing during an era that was far less favorable to hitters than today's.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
<< <i>Ichiro outshines Raines in so many other categories.
Point is that Ichiro is ... a better player than Raines was. >>
There, are you all happy now? My head just exploded.
Like Steve said earlier, he's neither over- nor underrated. Ichiro is what he is. An excellent hitter, provides much-needed speed at the top of the order, and tremendous outfield defense. I'm a big fan of his and believe he is already a lock for the HOF. As long as he gets his 10 years in, he's a shoo-in.
the exact words you wrote that I initially quoted is a near perfect description of Tim Raines in every way, except for being in the Hall-of-Fame. If you want to start adding things like hits and walks and MVP awards and extra-base hits, than there are some differences between the players. When it comes to the things you wrote originally there is very little difference and I find it hard to believe you cannot see that
Right now Raines has had the better career. Ichiro will likely surpass him within two or three years. Either way when it comes to the Hall-of-Fame, Raines was a drug user, Ichiro a pioneer, both things cloud the judgement of the voters and give a huge edge to the Japanese player
How can the best leadoff hitter in baseball be 55th this year in On Base Percentage? If the job of the best leadoff hitter in baseball is to get on base and score runs, why is Ichiro 24th in runs this year? Even if you want to make the argument that his steals should count as doubles (18+43), I'd still rather have Dustin Pedroia's 51 Doubles and 18 SBs.
<< <i>He sprays hits like Rod Carew, but steals more bases and scores more runs. >>
I'm not sure what's worse than having my head explode, but whatever it is it's about to happen if we're not only going to say Ichiro was better than Raines, we're actually going to say he was better than Carew? Tell me that wasn't your point, that you know Carew was better than Ichiro, or my demise will be on your head.
Since you mention Carew, the numbers don't lie. Suzuki has been the more productive hitter. Suzuki has more 200-hit seasons (8 to 4), more 100-run seasons (7 to 1), a higher career batting average, a slghtly higher slugging pct., and nearly as many steals (315 to 353) in 8 seasons as Carew got in 19. I was a big admirer of Carew's, but the one thing that always struck me was his lack of production to go with all those stellar batting averages, and his seeming lack of hustle.
<< <i>Suzuki has been the more productive hitter. >>
Well now I know what's worse than my head exploding. I won't describe it because it would gross everyone out, but trust me, it's not pretty. And it's your fault.
<< <i>
<< <i>Suzuki has been the more productive hitter. >>
Well now I know what's worse than my head exploding. I won't describe it because it would gross everyone out, but trust me, it's not pretty. And it's your fault. >>
Hey at least he didnt say he was better than Ron Santo
<< <i>Hey at least he didnt say he was better than Ron Santo >>
All kidding aside, we're talking about Rod Carew! Am I the only one who feels a shiver go down my spine when Ichiro is mentioned in the same sentence as Carew? At the risk of losing my official status, Carew was a better hitter than even Ron Santo, and he deserves better than this.
<< <i>
<< <i>Hey at least he didnt say he was better than Ron Santo >>
All kidding aside, we're talking about Rod Carew! Am I the only one who feels a shiver go down my spine when Ichiro is mentioned in the same sentence as Carew? At the risk of losing my official status, Carew was a better hitter than even Ron Santo, and he deserves better than this. >>
I do like Ichiro and think he is a great player but no I dont believe he should be mentioned with Rod Carew.
I want to know what it is about Carew that makes you think Suzuki should not be mentioned along with him. We have people in this thread claiming that Suzuki is overrated, a contention with which I disagree. But why isn't Carew overrated? Except for his magical 1977 season, the only outstanding statistics of his are batting average (7 titles in all) and triples. Even with all his triples he STILL couldn't score 100 runs in any season other than 1977.
Compare the two after their first 8 seasons in the majors:
---------- AB----R-----H---2B--3B-HR-RBI--AVG-SB--CS--SB%--TB--SLG--HR%
Carew 3915 551 1266 189 48 32 393 .323 137 72 .655 1647 .421 0.8***4 Batting Titles Rookie of Year; Gold Gloves 0 (0 for his entire career); MVP 0 (did win it in 1977)
Suzuki 5424 878 1796 195 64 73 467 .331 315 70 .818 2338 .431 1.3***2 Batting Titles; Rookie of Year; Gold Gloves 7 (likely to get #8 this year); MVP 1
Suzuki is every bit as good a hitter as Carew and is the far superior fielder and baserunner. I can appreciate Carew's greatness and your defense of him, but when you claim Ichiro doesn't measure up you must make your case.
<< <i>Guys, in my first post I never even hinted that Ichiro is a better hitter than Carew. I never suggested that he was better or worse than anyone. >>
<< <i>Suzuki is every bit as good a hitter as Carew and is the far superior fielder and baserunner. >>
If I still had a head, it would explode! You JUST said (see above) that they are equal as hitters, and that Ichiro is better at everything else. Unless losing my head has caused my logical skills to leave me, that is EXACTLY THE SAME THING as saying that Ichiro is better than Carew. You ARE saying that Ichiro is better than Carew, it is causing me intense physical and psychological pain, and I will excuse myself from this thread.
Ichiro's first eight years were a lot better than Robin Yount's first eight years too.
How about Albert Belle's first eight full years?
I repeat, I NEVER said Ichiro was better. The comparisons I have made since my first post were spurred by your challenging me with the claim that I said Ichiro was better. That thought never occurred to me until you put it my head. But now I must conclude that Ichiro Suzuki is, indeed, the better ballplayer. Whew! There, I said it. I feel much better now.
<< <i>Why did you choose to compare first eight years and not ages 27 to 34?
Ichiro's first eight years were a lot better than Robin Yount's first eight years too.
How about Albert Belle's first eight full years? >>
I chose to compare their first 8 years because those are concrete numbers that we can all grasp. I have no idea what their respective ages were at various stages of their careers. Ichiro's 1st 8 are indeed better than Yount's...they are better than the first 8 of most leadoff hitters in history. To compare him with Belle is senseless. Belle was a slugger. His numbers should be compared with those of other sluggers. The ONLY reason I am comparing Suzuki to Carew is because others have said that, not only was Carew the superior hitter, but Ichiro doesn't even deserve to be mentioned with Carew. That is absurd. To suggest that Ichiro is a great all-around player (not just a hitter) does not detract from the greatness of others. However, if one were to claim that player A is better than player B, than one should be prepared to explain why.
Carew's name appeared in my first post only as an example of players with talents similar to Suzuki's. I also mentioned Willie Wilson, Brett Butler, and Dave Parker. I never said Suzuki was better. I was merely pointing out what a unique player he is. He is a rarely seen combination of many talents who is difficult to categorize.
<< <i>Why did you choose to compare first eight years and not ages 27 to 34?
Ichiro's first eight years were a lot better than Robin Yount's first eight years too.
How about Albert Belle's first eight full years? >>
Just for kicks, here are Ichiro's numbers compared to those amassed by Carew from ages 27-34 (1973-1980)
------------AB---R----H----2B--3B-HR--RBI-AVG-SB--CS---SB%---TB-----SLG--HR%
Carew 4448 735 1549 226 68 57 560 .348 254 106 .706 2082 .468 1.3****5 Batting Titles; 1 MVP; 0 Gold Gloves
Ichiro 5424 878 1796 195 64 73 467 .331 315 70 .818 2338 .431 1.3****2 Batting Titles; 1 MVP; 7 Gold Gloves
This comparison is clearly more favorable to Carew than my earlier one. However, it still speaks to the point that Ichiro belongs in the same discussion. Plus, with Ichiro's superior baserunning and defense, he is the superior all-around player. Not only is he not overrated in my opinion, I think he is underrated. When we speak of the best players today, A-rod, Pujols, Jeter, and a select few come to mind. Ichiro is scarcely mentioned in that discussion. Even when we talk of the best hitters, it's always Pujols (deservedly so) and a few others, with Ichiro rarely a thought.