Not wild about the toning, but would leave it alone as it's original. I don't see this coin as a weak strike however. I see skirt lines and a thumb and plenty of feather on the Eagles breast. It looks like an early date MS65 to me. What am I missing? Pete
"Ain't None of Them play like him (Bix Beiderbecke) Yet." Louis Armstrong
I have never understood the grading of au58 walkers. I have seen and owned many pcgs au58 walkers that were taken from bank wrapped unc rolls and sent to pcgs and came back au58. I have watched many of these eget cracked out and sold raw as uncs. (hell, they were uncs).
I have never understood the grading of au58 walkers. I have seen and owned many pcgs au58 walkers that were taken from bank wrapped unc rolls and sent to pcgs and came back au58. I have watched many of these eget cracked out and sold raw as uncs. (hell, they were uncs). >>
Then again there's a plenty of MS63-64's with Stacking or Roll Marks that look more like AU58's... there was just a PCGS MS63 18-P on Ebay based on the obverse I wouldn't have touched that WLH.
To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
I know you don't buy anything other then these AU58s that looks MS. >>
I've only de-evolved back to AU58 since becoming friends with MFH, as prior to that I was a MS64-67 guy for 2 decades.
I'm having a LOT of fun over the course of the last year with these super sliders... yet this may have to be my last "Guess the Grade" as others are catching on!
To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
here's that ol au50 16-s...maybe you need to drop another 8 points in grade aye dayumm did i learn on this one to keep my mouth shut till in hand as the seller played the "oops...we forgot it was already sold card"
everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see
That's cool, as I first viewed the pics and then scrolled down, I was thinking to myself AU58. But as I starting reading others opinions I was thinking an MS grade. Just trust your instinct!
While I can understand the grade of AU, the strike detail shows the coin as MINT STATE. I'm not a fan of toning, per se. Mottled toning is my least favorite, but I would take this coin any day in my collection.
Just FYI and thanks for sharing it, Broadstruck. Correct me if I'm wrong calling it mottled.
<< <i>While I can understand the grade of AU, the strike detail shows the coin as MINT STATE. I'm not a fan of toning, per se. Mottled toning is my least favorite, but I would take this coin any day in my collection.
Just FYI and thanks for sharing it, Broadstruck. Correct me if I'm wrong calling it mottled. >>
I'm fine with Mottled... it's not the most attractive toning one could wish for. I've never dipped a coin, but feel this example wouldn't survive a dip without looking flat and dead. It has a great strike and the 1918-P is somewhat underrated as I have owned plenty of AU55-AU58 18-S's but the 18-P above VF30 to sometimes XF40 just isn't out there in the same quantity as the S.
To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
I thought the problem with this coin was some slight hairlines on the right field and that explains the 58 grade. I think it is nice. I have an 18 in a 58 holder as well without hairlines but not as sharply struck as this one. The reverse is very attractive for the grade
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
I love the coin as an AU58 and there appears to be very faint hairlines in the fields and on Ms. Liberty that would be consistent with a brief spell in circulation. This is a great coin.
<< <i>I love the coin as an AU58 and there appears to be very faint hairlines in the fields and on Ms. Liberty that would be consistent with a brief spell in circulation. This is a great coin. >>
Thanx TomB!
To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
Comments
Weak strike MS63?
The spotted toning does not seem that attractive to me.
<< <i>MS63... the toning looks like it was there when the poop hit the fan....
So RickO tell me how your really feel... you like it
<< <i>i'll go out on a ledge here...ms65 >>
Did you have a bowl of raw courage for breakfast today
<< <i>MS63, and I think that toning would dip right off in just a second or two. >>
Agreed. Dip that Baby!!
<< <i>
<< <i>i'll go out on a ledge here...ms65 >>
Did you have a bowl of raw courage for breakfast today
I did, AU-58.
<< <i>I think you need to set the white balance on that first.
Weak strike MS63?
The spotted toning does not seem that attractive to me. >>
Yes you are correct... Pics posted below more of what it looks like in hand by dropping the saturation levels.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
<< <i>I think it looks rather lovely as is. >>
Thanks TomB!
<< <i>I think it looks rather lovely as is. >>
There is a little dirt under her thumbnail.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Lincoln set Colorless Set
seems to be well struck and the rev also well struck?
63?
Pete
Louis Armstrong
The head has good detail. Reasonable strike.
The scratches are too much for 65. The toning is ugly. Don't dip it, but maybe give it the Taco Bell napkin treatment. Nice luster, just lousy color.
<< <i>MS63... the toning looks like it was there when the poop hit the fan....
That's not cow splatter................
This is cow splatter
Stefanie
.
CoinsAreFun Toned Silver Eagle Proof Album
.
Gallery Mint Museum, Ron Landis& Joe Rust, The beginnings of the Golden Dollar
.
More CoinsAreFun Pictorials NGC
bob
The Grade Guesses are as follows =
2 @ MS65
2 @ MS64
5 @ MS63
1 @ MS62-63
And then there's speety @ AU58... who ate his bowl of raw courage and isn't going to fall for the lil boy who cried wolf again.
Here's the sellers slab pic.
lol
hey i did better with that 16-s in an au50 if you recall
i shoulda known...to heck with a bowl of wheaties...i'm going back to special k
<< <i>i thought so.... >>
AU 62 is a little more accurate.
I have never understood the grading of au58 walkers. I have seen and owned many pcgs au58 walkers
that were taken from bank wrapped unc rolls and sent to pcgs and came back au58. I have watched many of these eget cracked out
and sold raw as uncs. (hell, they were uncs).
I know you don't buy anything other then these AU58s that looks MS.
<< <i>...another au 64 walker.
I have never understood the grading of au58 walkers. I have seen and owned many pcgs au58 walkers
that were taken from bank wrapped unc rolls and sent to pcgs and came back au58. I have watched many of these eget cracked out
and sold raw as uncs. (hell, they were uncs). >>
Then again there's a plenty of MS63-64's with Stacking or Roll Marks that look more like AU58's... there was just a PCGS MS63 18-P on Ebay based on the obverse I wouldn't have touched that WLH.
<< <i>BOYEAH!
I know you don't buy anything other then these AU58s that looks MS.
I've only de-evolved back to AU58 since becoming friends with MFH, as prior to that I was a MS64-67 guy for 2 decades.
I'm having a LOT of fun over the course of the last year with these super sliders... yet this may have to be my last "Guess the Grade" as others are catching on!
I proved once again that I have no clue about grading early Walkers.
dayumm did i learn on this one to keep my mouth shut till in hand as the seller played the "oops...we forgot it was already sold card"
<< <i>maybe I should have looked closer at the breast >>
Don't get all that absorbed on the breast as mentioned below WLH's have Stacking/Roll marks.
Here's the 18-P that crossed Ebay, I thought it was a 63 it was actually as MS64.
Item number: 320291659740
You are finding some nice AU58's. Wish I could.
<< <i>Rub a dud, told you I could not see the rub.
You are finding some nice AU58's. Wish I could.
I even posted larger pics for you this time!
<< <i>Also... Yeah or Nah on the Obverse toning
While I can understand the grade of AU, the strike detail shows the coin as MINT STATE.
I'm not a fan of toning, per se. Mottled toning is my least favorite, but I would take this coin any day in my collection.
Just FYI and thanks for sharing it, Broadstruck.
Correct me if I'm wrong calling it mottled.
<< <i>While I can understand the grade of AU, the strike detail shows the coin as MINT STATE.
I'm not a fan of toning, per se. Mottled toning is my least favorite, but I would take this coin any day in my collection.
Just FYI and thanks for sharing it, Broadstruck.
Correct me if I'm wrong calling it mottled.
I'm fine with Mottled... it's not the most attractive toning one could wish for. I've never dipped a coin, but feel this example wouldn't survive a dip without looking flat and dead. It has a great strike and the 1918-P is somewhat underrated as I have owned plenty of AU55-AU58 18-S's but the 18-P above VF30 to sometimes XF40 just isn't out there in the same quantity as the S.
like others, I can do without the mottled look, but I wouldn't kick it out of my collection, not by any means!
<< <i>Well... I could have called it an AU63.... and been half right...
I think the toning threw you for a loop!
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
I would call this coin a 62 manybe 63, without seeing it in hand.
Most dealers would call it "GEM BU" if it were raw.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
<< <i>I love the coin as an AU58 and there appears to be very faint hairlines in the fields and on Ms. Liberty that would be consistent with a brief spell in circulation. This is a great coin. >>
Thanx TomB!