Options
What do you think of copper spots on gold coin?
Not modern bullion but 1795-1932 mintages?
Do not be like this...

Try to be "smart"....you know, like you were discussing it with educated people...stretch, it's not that hard!
Do not be like this...

Try to be "smart"....you know, like you were discussing it with educated people...stretch, it's not that hard!


0
Comments
<< <i>I actually like copper toning on gold coins >>
Well, okay, me too to a degree -- but *toning* and *spotting* are, at least visually, two different things. Spotting is unsightly to me, whereas larger areas of toning may not be (and may even be attractive).
I knew it would happen.
but i happen to find this example very attractive... offered from the Costa Rica Connection
-sm
The Maddy Rae Collection
CURRENT BST OFFERINGS
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>I would defer to your opinion. >>
OK....here's what I think...
Copper spots have been present on gold coins as long as they have been made using the alloy as a means to harden the gold for modern mintage. IN US gold coins the mint uses an amalgam of 90% gold and 10% copper. It's there and there's no denying it. It's a natural ocurrence when visible on the surface and in this writer's opinion another mark of originality and accentuation of the beauty of gold coinage. It's the equivalent of knots on a redwood coffee table or a tiny bubbles in antique hand blown glass. Copper spots generally bloom in the early few years after minting and once removed it never returns and the coin has been forever altered. If a coin was known to have copper and shows up without it one would pause and have to wonder what else could have been done to the coin merely out of a sense of suspicion. Some dates are highly identified by copper like the 1908-S, 1921, and 1922-S Saints and to find one without copper is almost disappointing.
Some of the greatest Saints in the world have copper.
1921 MS66!
1927-S MS67!
1908-S MS67 (the FINEST of any 08-S)
and many, many other notable top pop coins. Two of the three 1922-S MS66's have copper. The MS65 1927-D in FUN 2006 HAD copper...ooops!....not anymore. So there's some substantiation??
<< <i><<I would defer to your opinion.>>
<<OK....here's what I think...
....
.... >>
Next time time you give Jay the open mike like that, I am going to lobby to have your account suspended.
Actually, it was a very good summary, and I agree completely.
<< <i>
<< <i><<I would defer to your opinion.>>
<<OK....here's what I think...
....
.... >>
Next time time you give Jay the open mike like that, I am going to lobby to have your account suspended.
Actually, it was a very good summary, and I agree completely. >>
That's because you are a smart, smart kid...just look here is RYK as a kid...
<< <i>I don't mind them if they are minor and they are not distracting. I've never seen a copper spot that helped the eye appeal of a coin. >>
You see, this is the way the biz has educated people in the last 20 years! Is the knot in a beautiful redwood table distracting and a takeaway? I see it as character and just "the way it is" and the same goes for copper spots. And I'm NOT talkingabout copper toning. That's a layup...it's always a plus.
These are coins....you like die breaks, rotated dies, all kinds of anomolies that frankly, I find less than attractive...but natural COLOR? It's great! And it is definately a sign of an original coin because copper will dip right off of most gold coins. If it's a good coin and it has copper, it's 98% likely that it's never been dipped.
That's worth the applause alone.
pathetic thread in this forum linky
0 responses since April. tia
<< <i>I think it brings character to the coin, although PCGS thinks different.
>>
This has been addressed with DHall. I think that he is thinking differently about it now. I spoke wiith him spcifically about that at the last 20th Century Gold Club meeting.
And gecko...I deliberately excluded modern gold. Let's stay with the right series'!
BTW jsf...the coin that Mr. Erkel RYK posted in your mini-thread was bought from me. It's ex: Duckor/Brahin....a true treasure!
on the flip side:
I love laughing more than learning, so thanks for that photo of RYK.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
<< <i>
<< <i>I would defer to your opinion. >>
OK....here's what I think...
Copper spots have been present on gold coins as long as they have been made using the alloy as a means to harden the gold for modern mintage. IN US gold coins the mint uses an amalgam of 90% gold and 10% copper. It's there and there's no denying it. It's a natural ocurrence when visible on the surface and in this writer's opinion another mark of originality and accentuation of the beauty of gold coinage. It's the equivalent of knots on a redwood coffee table or a tiny bubbles in antique hand blown glass. Copper spots generally bloom in the early few years after minting and once removed it never returns and the coin has been forever altered. If a coin was known to have copper and shows up without it one would pause and have to wonder what else could have been done to the coin merely out of a sense of suspicion. Some dates are highly identified by copper like the 1908-S, 1921, and 1922-S Saints and to find one without copper is almost disappointing.
Some of the greatest Saints in the world have copper.
1921 MS66!
1927-S MS66!
1908-S MS67 (the FINEST of any 08-S)
and many, many other notable top pop coins. All three 1922-S MS66's have copper. The MS65 1927-D in FUN 2006 HAD copper...ooops!....not anymore. So there's some substantiation??
Since they were made BEFORE my time and there is really nothing I can do about, one either lives with them or passes on them or finds an example without them. Unlike modern bullion which is NOT INTENDED to circulate, there is NO EXCUSE for putting out coins like the ASEs which blemish with time.
BTW there is ONE glaring error in Jay's post; anyone know what it is?
<< <i>BTW there is ONE glaring error in Jay's post; anyone know what it is? >>
Yes, it is this sentence: The MS65 1927-D in FUN 2006 HAD copper...ooops!....not anymore.
1927-S MS67...POP1..est value....$750K
Because of this danger to the public, the State realizes that these potentially dangerous items should be mitigated.
I have been empowered by the State with a professional license that allows me to safely handle such dangerous objects known by the state of california to potentially contain chemicals which may, if intravenously injected over years of time, cause cancer.
You don't want these unknown danger-spots around your children(*), as study after study has shown that they are highly contagious. I'm here to help.
As the only hazmat contractor in the state with such a license, I can safely and quickly isolate the contamination to prevent its eventual spread to the rest of your collection and children(*).
Our on site storage and disposal facilities are state of the art and have been designated with the green ISO-9477388.333 award for low energy consumption and zero emissions.
My fees are quite reasonable and competitive in the industry. You will be given an authentic "I Saved The Environment" sticker upon receipt of your contaminated, spotted coins.
* Copper spots have not been shown to affect the resale value of children.
Excuse me. May I go to the bathroom? .. ... .... ..... Thank you.
Sorry, I couldn't resist. It's the first picture that got me.
Spots on 22k gold? I seek them out.
Except for the copper spot I saw on a 24k buffalo. I hated that one and sent it back. It was a different sort of spot.
<< <i>
<< <i>BTW there is ONE glaring error in Jay's post; anyone know what it is? >>
Yes, it is this sentence: The MS65 1927-D in FUN 2006 HAD copper...ooops!....not anymore. >>
Care to elaborate? Students want to learn.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>BTW there is ONE glaring error in Jay's post; anyone know what it is? >>
Yes, it is this sentence: The MS65 1927-D in FUN 2006 HAD copper...ooops!....not anymore. >>
Care to elaborate? Students want to learn. >>
Does tampered with / doctored etc... make better sense? i.e. no more spot.
<< <i>I think it brings character to the coin, although PCGS thinks different.
Is that a legit PCGS insert
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>Forgive me, I know NOTHING about gold coinage or coloring and don't own any gold coins. I, of course, defer to saintguru in these matters. It is logical to me that a coin exhibiting coppery color traits is a sign of original surface. So, my question- can a "coppering effect" be added to such a coin in a manner that it would be very difficult to detect? Has this been attempted/done? Respectfully, John Curlis >>
No. Anyway, there has been a "campaign" over the last two decades or so that copper is a "take-away" to cover up for dipping coins, IMO. Adding copper? Maybe after I'm done with MY campaign you'll see that.
... more cents ?
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
Strip, strip, zap, zap, scrape, scrape, etc.
<< <i>For the most part I like them, they are fun and add a bit to the coin IMO. I've seen some I couldn't take though. One was a St. Double with a nice brown spot right smack dab in the middle of Liberty's crotch area...was weird and distracting. >>
An application of penicillin would have cleared that up!
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>BTW there is ONE glaring error in Jay's post; anyone know what it is? >>
Yes, it is this sentence: The MS65 1927-D in FUN 2006 HAD copper...ooops!....not anymore. >>
Care to elaborate? Students want to learn. >>
In his followup and not the OP he mentions the mint using an amalgam of gold and copper. The term amalgam refers specifically to alloys/mixtures of other metals with mercury as in the silver amalgam used in the dental business.
Except the one I have....I don't like it
Stefanie
.
CoinsAreFun Toned Silver Eagle Proof Album
.
Gallery Mint Museum, Ron Landis& Joe Rust, The beginnings of the Golden Dollar
.
More CoinsAreFun Pictorials NGC
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>BTW there is ONE glaring error in Jay's post; anyone know what it is? >>
Yes, it is this sentence: The MS65 1927-D in FUN 2006 HAD copper...ooops!....not anymore. >>
Care to elaborate? Students want to learn. >>
In his followup and not the OP he mentions the mint using an amalgam of gold and copper. The term amalgam refers specifically to alloys/mixtures of other metals with mercury as in the silver amalgam used in the dental business. >>
OHFERCHRISSAKES!! Gimme a break, will ya.
I meant ALLOY!:
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>Are copper spots on gold coins really that different than carbon spots on copper coins? >>
Yes. Carbon is oxidation which is a chemical reaction that mars the surface. Red/orange spots are just melted copper than didn't mix 100% when being made into an alloy.
Is there a good way to tell if the spots are removed other than lucking upon a pre-strip photo?
<< <i>
<< <i>Are copper spots on gold coins really that different than carbon spots on copper coins? >>
Yes. Carbon is oxidation which is a chemical reaction that mars the surface. Red/orange spots are just melted copper than didn't mix 100% when being made into an alloy. >>
I wouldn't really compare carbon spots on Lincolns to copper spots on saints. The streaky woodgrain early Lincolns are really more like them.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>BTW there is ONE glaring error in Jay's post; anyone know what it is? >>
Yes, it is this sentence: The MS65 1927-D in FUN 2006 HAD copper...ooops!....not anymore. >>
Care to elaborate? Students want to learn. >>
In his followup and not the OP he mentions the mint using an amalgam of gold and copper. The term amalgam refers specifically to alloys/mixtures of other metals with mercury as in the silver amalgam used in the dental business. >>
OHFERCHRISSAKES!! Gimme a break, will ya.
I meant ALLOY!: >>
I figgeredja prolly did.