Home U.S. Coin Forum

The Most SPECTACULAR Brown Lincoln Cent...EVER

Heritage Fun Auction...Get your checkbooks out for this one ladies and gentlemen:

This coin should be a 67BN in my opinion (or at least a star imageor something)! What a date:

image
image

PCGS 66BN

Heritage Pics
imageimage
Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
ANA Member R-3147111
«1

Comments

  • CgbCgb Posts: 710
    Is the coin itself bluish or is it just the lighting?
  • truly awesome looking. something tells me some members here could take photos of that coin and it would look 10X better.
    my ebay items BST transactions/swaps/giveaways with: Tiny, raycyca,mrpaseo, Dollar2007,Whatafind, Boom, packers88, DBSTrader2, 19Lyds, Mar327, pontiacinf, ElmerFusterpuck.


  • << <i>Is the coin itself bluish or is it just the lighting? >>



    Brown luster my friend, Texas Tea!!!

    image
    imageimage
    Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
    ANA Member R-3147111
  • nice but if you want a really nice coin at fun look at the 1914-d pcgs 64 brown. i think if you like that 16-d youll like this too. http://coins.ha.com/common/view_item.php?Sale_No=454&LotIdNo=137002
  • coinnutcoinnut Posts: 1,432 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice... glad the picture color is incorrect... would not like that... but brown is nice... and nice strike. Cheers, RickO
  • robecrobec Posts: 6,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great looking 16-D. Even has a Matte finish. The 14-D is super, but I do like the 16-D.
  • And the color looks fine, like the "browns" you have in your sig line.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • droopyddroopyd Posts: 5,381 ✭✭✭
    The 14-D appears to have a bit of spotting, and neither has a super-strong reverse strike. But I like 'em both anyway!


    Me at the Springfield coin show:
    image
    60 years into this hobby and I'm still working on my Lincoln set!
  • i noticed the rev. but i havent really seen to many toned 14-d lincolns out there.
  • Wow, I saw the title to this thread and wouldn't you know it, but the 16-D and 14-D are my coins. Also, check out the 1917-D PCGS 66RB at Heritage. It is an Eliasberg and very pretty. That one is mine as well. It is nice to know other people enjoy the beauty of browns and red-browns like me. I am going to miss those three very much. I have fallen in love with CBH's in 63-65. Also, it seems impossible to find nice unc. brown and red-brown early lincolns. There are some nice ones in proof but few in mint state. For those who like CBH's, look in the registry under the "Longinotti Collection" in both the 1807-36 basic and variety set. I had PCGS do the variety attribution and Phil photographed them. The best $10 (photo & reholder) investment you can make on a coin.

    Dale:

    Please have your half dollars photographed by Phil so we can all enjoy them. That 1823 in 66 is amazing and looks great on the PCGS 2008 calendar I received in the mail.

    Thank you all for the nice words.

    David
  • Thanks for the background story. And good luck.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • I forgot that these were photographed by PCGS as well. Here are the cert #'s so you can see them at PCGS.com. I think Phil did a great job.

    1917-D = 04517702

    1916-D = 21675451

    1914-D = 22119041

    David
  • LeeGLeeG Posts: 12,162
    The cat's out of the bag now. image Super examples image
  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    I prefer brown copper over RB and RD. Nice example.
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • I don't like it. I know, I'm such a contrarian!image
    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
  • Just checked out the true views. Those are the nicest non-red early date mintmark lincolns I've seen yet.
  • cohodkcohodk Posts: 19,285 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image
    image
    image
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,535 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow, those coins appear medallic as they were intended. I like the '16D, but the '17D is awesome! Congrats on the finds & wonder what these coins were doing & where they were these last 90 years...
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • My jaw dropped when I saw the 16-D. I've been wondering where some of the mintmarked 66BNs are hiding- very nice to see one. Would love to see the 25-D and 14-S in 6BN. Even a 65BN is very tough to make. I made a 17-S in 65BN this week- nice Christmas present.
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    amazing what a little ms70 does for copper

    K S
  • Are you saying you think that Eliasberg used MS70 on that 17-D or are you just referring to the other coins? A lot of early Lincolns in Eliasberg's cabinet looked very, very nice and were never played with, of course. Also, I personally do not think the 16-D was ever touched up.


  • << <i>Are you saying you think that Eliasberg used MS70 on that 17-D or are you just referring to the other coins? A lot of early Lincolns in Eliasberg's cabinet looked very, very nice and were never played with, of course. Also, I personally do not think the 16-D was ever touched up. >>



    I would agree that NONE of those coins were ever messed with. They are beautiful to behold.

    image
    imageimage
    Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
    ANA Member R-3147111
  • 66RB66RB Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I would agree that NONE of those coins were ever messed with. They are beautiful to behold.

    image >>



    Sorry I'm a little late to this thread, but I will strongly disagree with you on this one.

    That 16-D obviously started out life in 1916 as a full blazing red, and has toned from full blazing red to blazing blue, but the luster has not been subdued at all? The 16-D and the 14-D have the look that we should all be familiar with by now, the look that it has been treated with MS-70.

    Now, there are two camps with respect to the use of MS-70 on copper coins. Some say it is okay as it has been blessed by a major TPG and oooh look how pretty it is. Others won't go near them as what has been pounded into their heads from the first day they started collecting......buy original uncleaned coins, buy original uncleaned coins, buy original uncleaned coins.
  • 66RB66RB Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭
    Some interesting reading on MS-70 ]here

    Some more across the street

    Another interesting thread

    An excellent post by TomB

    Detective Cohodk here



    Plenty of reading there to draw your own conclusionsimage

    edit..How could I forget, we're all IDIOTS
  • fcfc Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭
    i know what conclusion i have. AT. some good links in this thread.
    lets see if cac stickers some of these in the future ;o)
  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,535 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS 70 is a solvent and reactant that CAN change the surface and appearance of coins. After application to a coin it must itself be stripped away with liberal detergent and water or possibly other agents such as acetone. That having been said, the blue color is not uncommon & depending on the viewer not necessarily unpleasant in appearance.
    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • There are a huge number of bluish early Lincoln wheats designated brown by NGC and PCGS. Are you saying that this has occurred to all of them?
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>amazing what a little ms70 does for copper >>

    I must admit, that was the first thing that came to my mind as well. I'd like to see this coin in person.


    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • robecrobec Posts: 6,772 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Some interesting reading on MS-70 ]here

    Some more across the street

    Another interesting thread

    An excellent post by TomB

    Detective Cohodk here



    Plenty of reading there to draw your own conclusionsimage

    edit..How could I forget, we're all IDIOTS >>




    What conclusion would you draw by viewing these two blue or bluish Lincolns, MS70? These were acquired from your Detective.

    image
    image
  • 66RB66RB Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭


    << <i>What conclusion would you draw by viewing these two blue or bluish Lincolns, MS70? These were acquired from your Detective.

    image
    image >>



    Well, he's not 'my' detective, but I will say that these two coins appear very similar to all of the ones we discussed last year, no? I think that if you read through the threads I linked in my above post, you may be able to

    << <i>draw your own conclusions >>





    I've been saying it for a while, it wasn't just proof Indians


  • << <i>There are a huge number of bluish early Lincoln wheats designated brown by NGC and PCGS. Are you saying that this has occurred to all of them? >>



    What say you?
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,032 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Boy, those sure are pretty.......think I may need to find room for one in my Box of 20........

  • cohodkcohodk Posts: 19,285 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>What conclusion would you draw by viewing these two blue or bluish Lincolns, MS70? These were acquired from your Detective.

    image
    image >>



    Well, he's not 'my' detective, but I will say that these two coins appear very similar to all of the ones we discussed last year, no? I think that if you read through the threads I linked in my above post, you may be able to

    << <i>draw your own conclusions >>





    I've been saying it for a while, it wasn't just proof Indians >>







    I am not much of a detective but here is the 1916 before it was crossed to PCGS. I bought it already in the PCGS holder. I have no idea where the 1913 came from, believe me I looked high and low to match it but could not.


    1916
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • 66RB66RB Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>There are a huge number of bluish early Lincoln wheats designated brown by NGC and PCGS. Are you saying that this has occurred to all of them? >>



    What say you? >>



    Pharmer, I'd say you are perfectly capable of drawing your own conclusionsimage You seem to be in the 'know' with all of this, how else can you explain your post on pg. 1 of this thread?



    << <i> Tuesday December 18, 2007 10:28 PM (NEW!)



    And the color looks fine, like the "browns" you have in your sig line. >>



    Something seems implied there, just haven't put my finger on itimage
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    Shoot, this is where Heritage should include the Trueview pics when available. If I was the consignor I would push for it.


  • << <i>There are a huge number of bluish early Lincoln wheats designated brown by NGC and PCGS. Are you saying that this has occurred to all of them? >>



    Answer the question, 66rb, you're the one making all the accusations. Don't have the guts to back them up now. Answer...that...question. Or everyone will know your full of it, or lying.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • Rob, I appreciate your opinion on the '16-d and your points on MS-70 are well taken. I'm sure that you have more expertise than me with respect to Lincolns as I have only been seriously looking at them for a little over 3 years (at least in my adult life).

    However, I disagree with your assessment regarding this particular '16-D cent. The coin clearly has orignal skin, superbly detailed stike and the color does not appear to be artificial to me. Why should the luster be impaired just because the cent is Brown? Perhaps it sat untouched for 80 or so years, mellowed to brown ever so slowly over time while maintaining its' original mint bloom. I don't think that the metallurgy of copper would prevent this from happening although I'm no metallurgist(image).

    So, in conclusion I would make the arguement that a bluish hue does not necessarily represent treatment with MS70. Specifically with respect to this coin.

    image

    imageimage
    Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
    ANA Member R-3147111
  • robecrobec Posts: 6,772 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    image
    image >>



    I think that if you read through the threads I linked in my above post, you may be able to

    << <i>draw your own conclusions >>


    >>



    This is a quote from one of the threads linked.

    << <i>The MS70 coins appear to have powdery or dusty surfaces. They can be quite readily identified with a bit of experience. >>


    Neither the 1916 or 1913 exhibit this characteristic. I am not saying they were or weren't doctored. I don't know the history of either, with the exception of what Dave stated. I trust and respect Dave as much as anyone in the business. To me, he is a true MPL expert and would not hesitate to buy from him at any time.
  • 66RB66RB Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>There are a huge number of bluish early Lincoln wheats designated brown by NGC and PCGS. Are you saying that this has occurred to all of them? >>



    Answer the question, 66rb, you're the one making all the accusations. Don't have the guts to back them up now. Answer...that...question. Or everyone will know your full of it, or lying. >>



    Pharmer, are you trying to bait me? LOL
    At any rate, what I was disagreeing with was that NONE of these coins were ever messed with.

    Did I ever say that every single blue Lincoln certified by PCGS or NGC has been treated with MS-70?
    Was PCGS made aware of the effects of MS-70 being used on copper coins?
    Did they say that they would continue to slab these coins, even after being made aware??

    How would I be full of it?? Why would I be lying??? I mean, it's not like I have an NGC 66BN 1909-S Lincoln in bright blue and pink on eBay for $5 grand, nor do I have a bright baby blue PCGS 66BN 09 VDB for $2500.

    No sweat off my back , nor yours, as you're just 'showing them off', right?
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I mean, it's not like I have an NGC 66BN 1909-S Lincoln in bright blue and pink on eBay for $5 grand, nor do I have a bright baby blue PCGS 66BN 09 VDB for $2500.

    ROTFLMAO. image
  • "Did I ever say that every single blue Lincoln certified by PCGS or NGC has been treated with MS-70?"

    No, you just insinuate it. Of course, if the owners of the coins in this thread have no objection to you saying their coins are treated by ms70, why should I care?

    Now, have the guts to answer the question. Are you saying that the huge number of bluish Lincoln early wheats designated as brown by NGC and PCGS are all treated with ms70?

    And no more answering questions with questions. Everyone's wondering why you are avoiding the question.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • ArizonaJackArizonaJack Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭
    Speaking of PCGS MS-66RB 1909 Lincolns, mine arrived today CohodK, it is genuinly a WOW coin and worth every cent and then some. Truly a gem among gems, THANK YOU !!!
    " YOU SUCK " Awarded 5/18/08
  • Oh, I see the owner of the coins you have said are treated with ms70 has answered, and says you are full of. What do you say to him?

    Also, what do you say about the blue coins in cohodk's sig line?

    There are a lot of blue Lincolns in this thread, and you have said they are treated with ms70. Why do you say that? Or are you back-tracking now that you've painted yourself into a corner?

    I think you should get some paint on your face trying to get yourself out of this.

    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • 66RB66RB Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭


    << <i>"Did I ever say that every single blue Lincoln certified by PCGS or NGC has been treated with MS-70?"

    No, you just insinuate it. Of course, if the owners of the coins in this thread have no objection to you saying their coins are treated by ms70, why should I care?

    Now, have the guts to answer the question. Are you saying that the huge number of bluish Lincoln early wheats designated as brown by NGC and PCGS are all treated with ms70?

    And no more answering questions with questions. Everyone's wondering why you are avoiding the question. >>



    Pharmer, I feel that a good number of, not all, of the early Lincolns that are solid blue have been treated. Are you happy I answered your question? Why does my opinion all of a sudden matter so much to you?

    Now, I asked you a question, need I ask it again? OK!

    What EXACTLY did you mean by saying this right after robec's post on pg. 1???????



    << <i>And the color looks fine, like the "browns" you have in your sig line. >>



    Cause I gotta tell you, it certainly sounds like you were 'insinuating' something there, and I think I know exactly what it is you were insinuating. It appears you are trying to throw me under the bus while you were getting out of the way.



  • << <i>

    << <i>"Did I ever say that every single blue Lincoln certified by PCGS or NGC has been treated with MS-70?"

    No, you just insinuate it. Of course, if the owners of the coins in this thread have no objection to you saying their coins are treated by ms70, why should I care?

    Now, have the guts to answer the question. Are you saying that the huge number of bluish Lincoln early wheats designated as brown by NGC and PCGS are all treated with ms70?

    And no more answering questions with questions. Everyone's wondering why you are avoiding the question. >>



    Pharmer, I feel that a good number of, not all, of the early Lincolns that are solid blue have been treated. Are you happy I answered your question? Why does my opinion all of a sudden matter so much to you?

    Now, I asked you a question, need I ask it again? OK!

    What EXACTLY did you mean by saying this right after robec's post on pg. 1???????



    << <i>And the color looks fine, like the "browns" you have in your sig line. >>



    Cause I gotta tell you, it certainly sounds like you were 'insinuating' something there, and I think I know exactly what it is you were insinuating. It appears you are trying to throw me under the bus while you were getting out of the way. >>



    Finally. Thanks for answering. Now we can discuss.

    What do you mean, not all? They all look similar. Answer that.

    On the last, WTF are you talking about? THAT's what got you riled? Look at the coins I mentioned. Use your eyes.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • 66RB66RB Posts: 2,516 ✭✭✭
    Answer the question, SIR.

    Not with other questions, EVERYBODY'S wondering why you aren't answering my simple question about what EXACTLY you meant, MR. Holier than Thou.
  • MyqqyMyqqy Posts: 9,777
    One of the reasons I love coin collecting so much- drama with a capital D, along with nefarious practices that are up for debate. As a non-copper guy, my opinion means squat but I LOVE the orange peel surfaces of the first 16-D- really amazing eye appeal. I would be a bit saddened if the color was artificial, because copper with blues can be pretty spectacular...
    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !
  • Yes, those brown lincolns are indeed blue. My point is, I have no idea, but you seem certain they have all been treated. Whats-his-name who is banned claimed that last year at this time. Curious, that. Anyway, I didn't comment then, but it strains credulity past breaking point that they all are treated with ms70. The Indians as well. So, I'm calling BS on your saying Robec's and cohodk's lincolns are treated. The onus is on you, and that was my point. Now, you satisfied?
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file