GRADE REVEALED(NEW PICS) Guess the Grade, 1934-D Buffalo Nickel Purchase

MJH · December 18, 2007 4:16AM

New Buffalo Nickel,

Guess the Grade.

cmerlo1 · December 18, 2007 4:18AM

AU-55

itsnotjustme · December 18, 2007 4:20AM

AU55

STONE · December 18, 2007 4:44AM

AU-58 for a weak strike

ad4400 · December 18, 2007 4:49AM

always hard from a pic, but I'm going to say no rub, with luster better in hand than the pic, and go MS- 64. A point for strike making up for dings, some of which may actually be uncompressed planchet, especially above the braid. I also assume those spots on top of the indians' head are on the holder. If on the coin, then back down a point. Likewise, if the pic captures all the luster that there is, down another notch.

MJH · December 18, 2007 10:21AM

anyone else?

Type2 · December 18, 2007 10:24AM

MS-63

AUandAG · December 18, 2007 10:25AM

AU50

bob

ricko · December 18, 2007 10:30AM

AU50-55.... Cheers, RickO

ecichlid · December 18, 2007 11:08AM

Of course, it's arguably impossible to grade accurately from a picture in AU and above. It looks like a scan, if it is, I'm saying AU.

Strike is typical for a 34-D. Not a good year.

MJH · December 18, 2007 11:47AM

Here are some different pics.

MJH · December 18, 2007 12:25PM

Somebody else !!

DRG · December 18, 2007 1:33PM

I am going out on a limb and saying MS64.

airplanenut · December 18, 2007 1:35PM

The last shots seem to show lustre with a weak strike. Clean surfaces otherwise, so I'd call it a 63. MS64 seems too lenient for the strike, and 62 might be a bit conservative.