Vent *%$%!!!

I realize that this topic has been discussed many times, but I can't understand why all of the Statehood quarters look like they were designed by Junior High art students on their lunch breaks.
"Hey, anybody want my fries?....hey what are we doing in gym today?....oh, hey, check out this design I did for the Washington quarter. Check out that sweet fish and mountain!"
Yeah, great, so all composition and true design concepts go out the window in favor of freakin' State outlines and sketches that lack all pleasing details. Was the goal to have the first freakin' thing that popped into someone's head be what should appear on these damn things?
I suppose this thought crosses my mind because I was reappreciating all of the amazing early commem designs out there.........how far we've fallen!
"Hey, anybody want my fries?....hey what are we doing in gym today?....oh, hey, check out this design I did for the Washington quarter. Check out that sweet fish and mountain!"
Yeah, great, so all composition and true design concepts go out the window in favor of freakin' State outlines and sketches that lack all pleasing details. Was the goal to have the first freakin' thing that popped into someone's head be what should appear on these damn things?
I suppose this thought crosses my mind because I was reappreciating all of the amazing early commem designs out there.........how far we've fallen!
0
Comments
Oh, and state sponsored design contests open to Junior High civics and art classes.
It all boils down to taste, brother. The chain cent was hated too. Who knows, someday they may be looked at differently.
Montana is probably my favorite. Can't beat that Bison skull...sorta reminds me of the Spanish Trail Commem!
Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
ANA Member R-3147111
<< <i>I realize that this topic has been discussed many times, but I can't understand why all of the Statehood quarters look like they were designed by Junior High art students on their lunch breaks.
"Hey, anybody want my fries?....hey what are we doing in gym today?....oh, hey, check out this design I did for the Washington quarter. Check out that sweet fish and mountain!"
Yeah, great, so all composition and true design concepts go out the window in favor of freakin' State outlines and sketches that lack all pleasing details. Was the goal to have the first freakin' thing that popped into someone's head be what should appear on these damn things?
I suppose this thought crosses my mind because I was reappreciating all of the amazing early commem designs out there.........how far we've fallen! >>
I guess you haven't looked at the last 3....Montana, Washington & Idaho ... ( I like to meet the Jr H.S. artist who created these)
Montana
Washington
Idaho
Being a resident of CA. I have to say that the CA. quarter s_cks. Too busy and too trite.
U.S. Type Set
CG
Other stinkos:
CT: Is that a brain coral?
NC: The flying ladder. Good idea, but the artistry failed.
<< <i>
<< <i> am new to the board and grading but like these grading exercises. >>
Why did Idaho choose a parakeet? Why did Montana choose the remains of dead cattle--is it a barren wasteland and are they tryig to warn us to stay away?
CG >>
Now I understand why you don't like any ... Go & locate your spectacles ...
These designs have little to do with coin design as much as they do a consensus of what the general population of the state wants.
Some of them are quite nice while others just blow chunks!
The name is LEE!
1.) Citizen enters state-sponsored SHQ design contest (which vary by state) & wins.
2.) State Governor's office translates winning drawing into a descriptive written paragraph.
3.) Artist (AIP or Mint Sculptor Engravors) reinterpret paragraph into a drawings.
4.) These drawings then get reviewed by CCAC (Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee) who select one and usually advise changes.*
5.) These drawings then get reviewed by CFA (Committe of Fine Arts) who select one usually advise changes.*
6.) These drawings, along with CCAC & CFA selects, are given back to the State's Governor's Office, who selects one, and can advise changes.
7.) Design gets reviewed by various Mint manufacturing departments who advise coinability-related changes.
8.) Design gets reviewed by Mint Director who can advise changes.
9.) Design gets reviewed by Sevretary of the Treasury who can advise changes.
10.) Design gets resubmitted to state's Governor's office can advise changes.
11.) Design gets interpreted 3-dimensionally by Mint Sculptor Engravors.
12.) Design gets reduced, reveresed into dies, and coins are minted.
* It is worth noting that these committees review drawings and NOT relief sculptures; it is an absolute fact that a gaping flaw with such a jury method, is that a careful rendering or life-like portrait would have a great advantage over a superior but more simply rendered submission, even though such drafting nuances would have absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the three-dimensional translation. (In simpler English: the shadows on the sailboat or the human twinkle in John Smith's eye cannot be recreated on a coin, yet in this process they are in a position to eclipse a simple line design for what would make a better coin.)
Sadly, if great art ever comes from this process, it will have been despite it.
>>>My Collection
Successful BSTs with: Grote15, MadMarty, Segoja,cucamongacoin,metalsman.
<< <i>Design by committee NEVER works...as Artist pointed out, these designs start (mostly) with non-artists and progress through pseudo-intellectuals who all contribute nothing (but feel they MUST contribute something) constructive to the initial feeble effort, thereby moving the design steadily away from art and toward crass commercialism. SeattleSlammer, I agree with you (and I live in Seattle), the Washington state quarter, as all SHQ's, panders to commercialism and a bid for tourism. Art, in the coin world, is either dead or on life support. Cheers, RickO >>
Great post.