Speaking of 1881 CC Morgans... Grade this one.

techeff

Stuart

MS-64

billboat

<< <i>MS-64 >>



Yep! Me too!

ziggy29

63. IMO there are just too many tics and scuffs on the cheek -- the prime focal area -- even though the rest of the coin looks to be of 65 quality. If the scuffs on the cheek aren't as pronounced in hand as the image makes them appear, it could go 64.

messydesk

Aye. 64.

Tonedbuff

64... and nice and frosty!

billboat

Not that I necessarily agree with the practice but for some reason CCs seem to be graded a tad looser than other Morgans by TPGs--hence my 64.

DennisH

MS63

commoncents05

copy cat. i say 64 as well, a little less baggy than mine is.

-Paul

sweetwilliet

64.0, looks nice.

techeff

Any Morgan collectors care to chime in?

dragon

<< <i>Any Morgan collectors care to chime in? >>




chiming in

techeff

chiming in


Cool, thanks! What are 1878 REV 79 VAM-203 MS65 going for these days?

Connecticoin

LXIV

pbfloyd

64. It has the frost which any good 81 should. not a pq 64 though

TorinoCobra71

Mint State Sixty Four - Shot FIVE!


TorinoCobra71

Goldeagle1981

NGC MS64; PCGS MS63 (although Rev. is a 64; obverse is not good enough). It will be interesting you will send this coin in for grading by one of this company (or both).

ricko

MS63.... Cheers, RickO

greghansen

MS64

410a

.-
lock 65 luster distubed on cheek.

techeff

lock 65 luster distubed on cheek.


PCGS 65, you got it. You're right about the cheek and the coin has a great strike..

BigAl

64

a bit too much chatter on the cheek (and that's where it counts to earn anything higher at pcgs)