Home U.S. Coin Forum

Key date dimes: Which would you purchase? (2006 thread revival!)

rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited March 28, 2023 3:19PM in U.S. Coin Forum

You are at a hypothetical coin show, and your favorite dealer has just offered you two key date dimes, an 1895-O Barber, and a 1916-D Mercury. They are both housed in PCGS holders. The Mercury is an eye-appealing, high-end AU-58 with full luster (PCGS price guide value $12,500 in MS-60, but it looks a little better than most MS-60s, as AU-58s frequently do). The Barber is a PCGS MS-64 and is accurately graded (PCGS price guide value $13,000).

Assume you have the money to buy one or the other, and both are priced at $11,000. Which one would you buy, and why?
«1

Comments

  • dbldie55dbldie55 Posts: 7,735 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If I was not creating a collection of one or the other, then I would choose the 1916-D. More popular series so it should appreciate more.
    Collector and Researcher of Liberty Head Nickels. ANA LM-6053
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 13,996 ✭✭✭✭✭
    More people collect Mercury dimes than Barber dimes, so there's a broader base of potential customers when resale time comes.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • Assuming I had that kind of money laying around for coin purchases (which is a big stretch!) it would be the 1916-D Mercury. After that, the rest of the set would be painless. image
    If you haven't noticed, I'm single and miserable and I've got four albums of bitching about it that I would offer as proof.

    -- Adam Duritz, of Counting Crows


    My Ebay Auctions
    image
  • DJCDJC Posts: 787
    The Mercury, simply because I like the design better.
  • notwilightnotwilight Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭
    Pretty detailed hypothetical. Do you have PCGS serial numbers?
  • ARCOARCO Posts: 4,416 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I love the Barber coins, but in this case the 1916-D would be the winner. Much larger collector base, famous key date, and a beautiful coin design. Didn't you say AU58? Probably the best value grade in numismatics.

    Tyler
  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Pretty detailed hypothetical. Do you have PCGS serial numbers?


    I was just trying to get the fair market value as close together as possible, to avoid trivial comparisons based on slight differences in current market value.
  • MillertimeMillertime Posts: 2,048 ✭✭
    I'd pick the '16-D. If it was a rattler holder it would stay in my set otherwise it would be trade bait. This is of couse assuming I would ever have that kind of money for coin purchases.

    3 months ago I would have said it was idiotic to spend that kind of money on just another dime, but not anymore.

    Millertime
  • numismanumisma Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭✭

    1895-O for me. Way tougher than the 16-D and a better value.
  • I wouldn't buy either. If I were after dimes, I'd ask if he had any better seated dimes.

    Ray
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,074 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd get an 1822 image
  • DeepCoinDeepCoin Posts: 2,781 ✭✭✭
    There is much stronger demand for the 16-D, so I would choose that one if I HAD to choose one. I think the 16-D has had quite the run up in the past few years and I doubt there will be much appreciation in the near term. I just think the market for expensive Barber dimes is very thin.

    If there is a market correction in the near term, I think the 16-D is at risk due to the latest run up. But who knows as this is one of the major keys that non collectors are also aware of. This coin and the 1909 SVDB are two of the least rare and most expensive coins IMHO (Along with the beautiful High Relief Saints, but they did not get the publicity of the other two)
    Retired United States Mint guy, now working on an Everyman Type Set.
  • I have the 16D needed it for my set,,,,,,..
    Jerryf43
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    I'm going to assume neither one has a strong edge in eye appeal for this answer.

    If I were mainly concerned about future resale or I were primarily concentrating on Mercs, I'd go with the '16-D. Otherwise, I'd prefer the '95-O myself.
  • CalGoldCalGold Posts: 2,608 ✭✭
    I would buy the coin that has appreciated the least over the past five years.

    CG
  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,500 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would buy one each of two 1804 varieties in Fine instead.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would buy the coin that has appreciated the least over the past five years.

    I would have to guess that is the 1895-O, but I'm not 100% sure on that. Anyone know for certain?


    would buy one each of two 1804 varieties in Fine instead.

    We think alike, but where does one locate a Fine 1804 dime without getting killed on the price? You've got a huge edge in rarity with this issue for sure.
  • ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,558 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If I was collecting a complete set of Barber Dimes and I planned on keeping it for awhile, I'd see if I could shave a little bit on its price & go with that coin. Personally, I think it's a better value.

    I'd also do some homework. Ie., how long has my favorite dealer had the Barber Dime? Ie., if he had it for three months or so, as far as I'm concerned, the price is negotiable.

    OTOH, the 16 D is such a popular coin, I doubt there'd be any wiggle room price wise, assuming it's priced right to begin with. As an aside, I've always avoided coins like the 16 D Dime and the 09 S VDB Cent because while they are two extremely popular coins, I don't consider either of them to be especially scarce.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,500 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I would buy the coin that has appreciated the least over the past five years.

    I would have to guess that is the 1895-O, but I'm not 100% sure on that. Anyone know for certain?


    would buy one each of two 1804 varieties in Fine instead.

    We think alike, but where does one locate a Fine 1804 dime without getting killed on the price? You've got a huge edge in rarity with this issue for sure. >>



    How about here? Sold for $4,312.50 incl. the juice. Damage isn't as bad as it sounds.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • Mortgage the house...why choose?
  • jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,713 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Since I have owned a PCGS 16-d similar to the one you are referring too, I would choose the 95-o as I have never owned a specimen above Au-53. The 95-o is a much tougher coin, but does not have as strong a collector base therefore the price is a bit less.

  • CaseyCasey Posts: 1,502 ✭✭
    The Barber dime. However, my opinion is pretty biased since Barber dimes are my primary collecting interest.
  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The Mercury dime was leading 10-3, on the verge of blowing out its uglier but scarcer competitor- but the score has closed to 18-15. Interesting. I wonder if any of the polls on here are ever statistically meaningful?


    Tomorrow, if I remember, I will start another one of these with the 1901-S quarter squaring off against the 1916 Standing Liberty.
  • OmegaOmega Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭
    Pretty, very pretty, vs. Blahber. Merc all the way!
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,308 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've never been overly impressed with the 95-0 in UNC, esp in MS64 at $13,000, and the 16d Merc is downright overpriced.

    But would I would buy is a nice XF-AU 1895-0. Those are not so plentiful and in the long run will probably outpace the 16d.

    For my druthers I'd prefer the 1804 dime as well. And toss in the monster key 1874-cc as well. If I had $13,000 and had to buy a dime, one of those would be on the plate...nothing else comes close imo.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,713 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Second to that, I would love to find an 1874-cc dime like gerry fortins. After seeing that coin in person in Baltimore, I will be a strong competitor if it ever comes to market??
  • mortgage the house!
  • TheRavenTheRaven Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭✭
    1895-O for me.....

    Barbers image
    Collection under construction: VG Barber Quarters & Halves
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,074 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Cladiator said:
    I'd get an 1822

    .
    .
    .
    And I did :)

  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Cladiator said:

    @Cladiator said:
    I'd get an 1822

    .
    .
    .
    And I did :)

    Now you have to show a picture of it! Congrats!

    Why did I not go for an 1804 dime back then? They are not only more expensive these days, but they are very difficult to locate.

  • jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,713 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Long time since this thread. Since then, have owned a 16-d in AU-58, 64+FB,
    95-o dime in 62 and 63.
    22 dime in 58
    1804 dime in 45
    all since sold as the time had come to say goodbye

  • DisneyFanDisneyFan Posts: 2,174 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @rhedden said:

    I own the 1895-O Barber dime in PCGS MS64. Bought it shortly after posting this thread in 2006.

    As they say in literary circles, "Picture, please."

  • CoinPhysicistCoinPhysicist Posts: 602 ✭✭✭✭
    edited March 28, 2023 8:20PM

    Neither. I’m not really one for relatively modern key dates in MS grades. I’d take that same budget a buy a 1796 in the best grade I could find.

    Successful transactions with: wondercoin, Tetromibi, PerryHall, PlatinumDuck, JohnMaben/Pegasus Coin & Jewelry, CoinFlip, and coinlieutenant.

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    While I would prefer the 16d for beauty, I would select the 1895O Barber Dime as it has doubled in value in the last 20 years while the 1916D Mercury Dime has produced a 36% growth over the same period. JMO
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • DisneyFanDisneyFan Posts: 2,174 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @rhedden said:

    I bought the coin in a 1989 green PCGS holder as PCGS MS63. Opinion on this forum was that it would make 64 or maybe even 65 if I resubmitted it. It came back 64 and has never been sent to CAC. I paid the previous owner 64 greysheet Bid money for it back in 2006.

    Nice coin! Brave, courageous, and bold for paying Greysheet 64 money for a 63!

  • erscoloerscolo Posts: 610 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The 1916-D Mercury Dime is part of one of the most beautiful series every produced by this country, and as such is a coin I would not mind owning. I do have the 1937-1945 issues of that series, all in mint state condition. I have all of the 1916-1936 issues yet to go, though many would not be in mint state condition given their value. The price willing to be paid is the price, there is no such thing as overpriced unless the coin does not sell, it is what the market will bear in the end.

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,064 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 29, 2023 7:48AM

    @rhedden said:
    2006 to 2023 Super Necro-Post, Ancient Thread Revival Alert!

    Today, I remembered posting this thread many years ago, and I thought I'd try to fish it out. I couldn't believe it was from all the way back in 2006!

    Anyway, here's today's update:

    The 1916-D Mercury dime is showing $14,000 in PCGS AU58 in the price guide ($15,000 in MS60, if one exists)

    The 1895-O Barber dime is showing $25,000 in PCGS MS64 in the price guide

    I own the 1895-O Barber dime in PCGS MS64. Bought it shortly after posting this thread in 2006.

    RichieURich gets the "post of the day award" for Dec. 4, 2006. I should have bought an 1804 dime in fine. :)

    Assuming you could have bought it from the price guide back then and not had to deal with the absolute scarcity of that issue.

  • The_Dinosaur_ManThe_Dinosaur_Man Posts: 997 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My younger self would have gone with the 16-D since I was pursuing the set then. My now slightly more experienced self would pick the 95-O, factoring in the lower population and relatively lower market value.

    Custom album maker and numismatic photographer.
    Need a personalized album made? Design it on the website below and I'll build it for you.
    https://www.donahuenumismatics.com/.

  • TheRavenTheRaven Posts: 4,147 ✭✭✭✭

    I remembered this post when I saw it pop up again. Still like the 95-O. Still love me some barbers.

    Collection under construction: VG Barber Quarters & Halves
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,275 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Neither one would fit in my collection, but it I had to pick, it would be the 1916-D Mercury. That is a classic key date appeals to many collectors. Sorry, but I have never been a Barber coin fan.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 29, 2023 10:40AM

    @DisneyFan said:

    @rhedden said:

    I bought the coin in a 1989 green PCGS holder as PCGS MS63. Opinion on this forum was that it would make 64 or maybe even 65 if I resubmitted it. It came back 64 and has never been sent to CAC. I paid the previous owner 64 greysheet Bid money for it back in 2006.

    Nice coin! Brave, courageous, and bold for paying Greysheet 64 money for a 63!

    It was a large collection I bought wholesale. We had a good business relationship. I paid him greysheet Bid for the coins in green holders, then sent the obvious upgrade candidates in for regrade. If they graded a point higher, I paid him the difference. The rest I kept in 1989 green holders. I paid $6k for this one as a 63, gave him another $3k after it upgraded, so $9k total. It's $25k in the PCGS price guide now, so I made out more than OK. It wasn't so risky for me, because I would never have gotten a coin this nice for $9k if I went through retail channels. At a retail venue like a large coin show, it likely would have been overgraded in a 65 holder, because those were the golden days of the crackout artist with no CAC watchdog in place.

  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,315 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You did good, buying the 95-O

    Had this been a new thread or had I seen it in '06 I'd have opted for the 95-O

    It's a rather nice 64, I would def send it in for a bean.

  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,818 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 29, 2023 1:01PM

    I would have more interest in the 95-O by a mile, but that's just me. There's nothing about a 16-D that appeals to me personally. For being "so rare", they're actually pretty easy to find.

  • DisneyFanDisneyFan Posts: 2,174 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BillJones said:

    Sorry, but I have never been a Barber coin fan.
    >
    As someone else on this board often states, "Complain about this."

    "

    I restarted collecting coins about twenty years ago and this is probably the nicest coin in my collection even though I don't collect Barber Dime proofs. The the fields are a watery pale yellow to white mirrors and the red and blues just pop out at you. I didn't know coins existed like this, much less ever expected to own it. And yes, it's CAC.

  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Killer proof Barber 10c with original skin. I bet the mirrors are deep and glassy, too.

  • Sunshine Rare CoinsSunshine Rare Coins Posts: 2,325 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A key date Carson City Seated dime would have done much better than both of these pieces!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file