Ax, your pic is worse. Why? You have a lower quality camera, it's that simple. Is it the best camera phone for the money, nope. Hate to break it to you radioshack boy.
Collecting; Mark Mulder rookies Chipper Jones rookies Orlando Cabrera rookies Lawrence Taylor Sam Huff Lavar Arrington NY Giants NY Yankees NJ Nets NJ Devils 1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
<< <i>Enlarging your photo and altering mine in a desperate attempt to be 'right'?
hah just proves what a pathetic, idiotic troll you really are.
Those camera sellin fools sure saw you coming, idiot! >>
I adjust all of my photos to 600 x 450, which fit the forum just perfectly. You see, if I put them on here straight from the camera, they are so huge that you would have to scroll forever. The only way I could get your pathetic excuse for a photo side by side with a real one was to make them at 400 x 300. Nice try though
Tell you what, I'll increase yours to 600 x 450 and compare them to some of my outdoor shots. Now we can compare apples to apples.
Yours:
Mine
When you pathetic excuse for a so-called camera can even hold a candle to that, let me know.
Edited to add a couple more
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
2......Axtell sells inferior phones from a kiosk in a mini mall cuz he has been fired from so many jobs he has to work for himself. hence the reason he is online during work.
3......Axtell is so pig headed that even under the most overwhelming evidence that he is wrong he will stubbornly stay with donkey blinders on.
4.....He knows less about cameras then he does about baseball. (which ain't much)
Another brilliant contribution from the resident troll, WP.
<< <i>2......Axtell sells inferior phones from a kiosk in a mini mall cuz he has been fired from so many jobs he has to work for himself. hence the reason he is online during work. >>
Uhm no I don't work in a kiosk, never been fired from a job, and don't work for myself. And online during work? In case you didn't know it, idiot, anyone who has internet access is online at work.
<< <i>3......Axtell is so pig headed that even under the most overwhelming evidence that he is wrong he will stubbornly stay with donkey blinders on. >>
Sorry...I don't see a difference in picture quality. 'Pig headed'? Utterly brilliant.
<< <i>4.....He knows less about cameras then he does about baseball. (which ain't much) >>
And you're a camera expert now, along with resident baseball bandwagon rider?
<< <i>5.....Did I mention he is a stupid dope? >>
Yes, you've done that 100000 times. And even though you pound it into your keyboard with veins bulging out of your forehead over and over, it doesn't make it true. Sorry, assclown.
<< <i>6.....He never did answer my specific questions. >>
And you've admitted to riding winning team's bandwagons.
as you have just admitted to not answering my specific questions.
you are a dope, no, make that a stupid dope. and yes it is very true.
and NO not everyone (or anyone) with internet access uses the boss's time.
And since you have been proved to be such a liar here I don't believe anything you say. You have been fired from so many jobs prolly cuz you are unmanagable. Hence you now work for yourself in some 3rd rate mall selling inferior phones.
no I never said I was a camera expert. I can read (unlike you) and absorb what is said. (unlike you) therefore I can come to these conclusions.
actually you are a racist, liar, stupid, pigheaded dope.
<< <i>3......Axtell is so pig headed that even under the most overwhelming evidence that he is wrong he will stubbornly stay with donkey blinders on. >>
Sorry...I don't see a difference in picture quality. 'Pig headed'? Utterly brilliant. >>
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Oh that's too funny, Tinkerbell.
Thank you, again, for showing everyone why your credibility, what you think, and what you say equates to absolutely nothing.
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Did you have many customers at the Radio Shack kiosk today? Did they laugh in your face, as usual, when you attempted to "sell" them on the latest and greatest technology today? Did they give you a funny look when you were checking out a guy that resembles A-Rod? Did a tear come out of your eye went you went home to grandma's basement without making one sale, as usual?
Poor, poor Tinkerbell. No wonder why you send so much time here and the D&D forum.
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
Sorry...I don't see a difference in picture quality. 'Pig headed'? Utterly brilliant. >>
ahhhhhhhh I was not talking about the pictures. i was reffering to the original post. well actually part 2 of the original post. but that is ok.
the one where you pasted an article from the daily news and were asked a simple question. you know the question, would you also paste the ny post article that rebutted the one from the daily news? however cuz you have your donkey blinders on and have as usual derailed the thread it went right over your head.
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
<< <i>Only a desperate and pathetic fool would go through all the trouble of detailing out 'flaws' in a photo. >>
Translation: Tinkerbell just got owned like a $2 ho
<< <i>Desperate to prove 'I'm right!' and that you didn't get doped into overspending on a 4 MP phone. >>
I proved that I was right with the first post and didn't over spend, like your "merchandise"
<< <i>Pathetic to keep hounding a point over and over and over....get over yourself. >>
Pot, meet Tinkerbell
<< <i>Awesome photo. >>
Thank you
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
But it's apparent you will never concede you got owned on your camera purchase (much like you'll never concede the texans made the wrong move in passing on Bush).
But, if it helps you sleep better at night thinking these things, go for it.
I am sure your $2 ladies of the night appreciate your money.
Are you banging your keyboard in frustration? Face beet red yet? Smoke coming out of your ears?
It's so much fun proving you wrong over and over and again and again, Tinkerbell.
Go back to work, slacker.
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
Why aren't you as vocal in the Bush vs. williams thread? Your homie williams is getting his ass handed to him!
Might it be because even a numbskull like you can see the light now, and you don't want to admit it? Don't want to admit that we all were right all along and your miserable franchise made yet another in a long, long line of terrible decisions?
Instead you want to rant on and on and on about 'my camera's better!'
Geeze Tinkerbell, how many times do we have to go over this? Blue light means I'm not here. Sheesh...
Nice try trying to change the subject. I have proven, beyond a shadow of the doubt, that your "excellent" camera is actually a POS:
Just try to print that picture out to "8x11" and see how it turns out
Dope.
No wonder you don't make any sales at the Radio Shack mini-mall kiosk. Your "pitch" is an insult to real salespeople. Remember, when potential customers walk away from your stand laughing, they aren't laughing with you, they are laughing at you.
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
<< <i>WP can you rename this thread "The great digital picture debate of '06" so I quit checking in to see if it is back on topic?
Thanks >>
Well most, if not all, consider Tinkerbell to be a woman and she was proven wrong, as usual.
So I guess you can consider this thread completely on topic
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
The thread dissolved completely into clownie (err stownie) whining and complaining that there's no way a 2 MP camera phone will take as good as pictures as his overpriced 4 MP.
Then he proceeded to dissect a photo I took with a camera phone (furthering my assumption this forum is his only social interaction).
Then he proceeded to call me tinkerbell a couple hundred times, say I was owned like a '2 dollar ho' a couple hundred times, says 'pot, meet kettle' a few thousand times, and looked every bit the forum tool in doing so.
"2 megapixel is excellent quality...I won't be blowing it up beyond 8x11"
"Finally, why don't you STFU and leave those of us who know what you're talking about alone, ok little boy?"
"2 megapixel IS excellent quality."
"Anyone who tells you different is trying to (and apparently, already has) sold you something...way to be fooled and fulfill the typical American consumer - bigger numbers must mean better!"
"Or are you trying to say I couldn't print that at 8x11" with no problems? The funny thing is, the native size of that photo IS 8x11, crackhead."
"And if you honestly think there's much picture quality difference between your camera and mine, well, I am sure the minimum wage earners hocking phones at best buy aren't laughing at you."
"You honestly think 4 MP is going to give substantially better than my camera's 2 MP? HAHAH and you want to call *me* a dope?"
"you have your opinion (it's wrong, but it's your opinion), I have mine (the right one, as usual)."
"those of us grounded in reality see the truth. There's no difference."
"Sorry...I don't see a difference in picture quality."
And what happened to your picture, Tinkerbell? Embarrassed, huh?
<< <i>That's this thread in a nutshell. >>
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
I guess when you are so desperate to prove you didn't get ripped off you're going to yell over and over.
Get lost, dipchit. >>
You haven't changed the location? Huh?? What location are you talking about? Are you so frustrated that you can't even think before you type?
Yes, you were proven wrong, again, and now you're sulking. It's okay, Tinkerbell. On to proving you wrong on other lies
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
[qYou haven't changed the location? Huh?? What location are you talking about? Are you so frustrated that you can't even think before you type? >>
You just got done saying, dipchit, that I was 'embarassed' after asking 'what happened to my picture?' as if I moved the photo, or removed it. DO YOU EVEN KNOW WTF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT?
Answer? NO, OBVIOUSLY!
<< <i>Yes, you were proven wrong, again, and now you're sulking. It's okay, Tinkerbell. On to proving you wrong on other lies >>
The only thing you've ever proven is just how fond you are of $2 ho's, but then when you call one 'mom', you're going to be fond of them.
<< <i>[qYou haven't changed the location? Huh?? What location are you talking about? Are you so frustrated that you can't even think before you type? >>
You just got done saying, dipchit, that I was 'embarassed' after asking 'what happened to my picture?' as if I moved the photo, or removed it. DO YOU EVEN KNOW WTF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT?
Answer? NO, OBVIOUSLY!
<< <i>Yes, you were proven wrong, again, and now you're sulking. It's okay, Tinkerbell. On to proving you wrong on other lies >>
The only thing you've ever proven is just how fond you are of $2 ho's, but then when you call one 'mom', you're going to be fond of them. >>
Tinkerbell is so flustered that:
1) Can't quote properly 2) Talking about random locations and actually justifing his brain fart 3) Resorting to "mom" insults
Your embarrassing photo, which you deleted (not "changed the location" :snickers: ), is inferior to mine.
Case closed
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
I didn't delete anything, dipchit. Unlike you, my life doesn't revolve around a silly messageboard and trying to prove to complete strangers I didn't get ripped off in buying a 4 MP camera.
The photo is still there, perhaps you'd like to issue a formal apology?
And mom jokes? It's not a joke when it's truth. I am sure all those men who passed in and out of your home when you were a child confused you, calling them 'dad?' as you weren't sure which man your father was.
It also would explain your desperate cries for attention your posts (in particular this thread) show you to be.
Go to yahoo photos, look for my id (axtell2k3) and then find my photos...you'll see they haven't been touched.
Then, come back, bow down, and beg my forgiveness. Until then? STFU, troll.
Copy and paste in your browser and tell me what you see.
Dope.
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
Put it in your browser and tell me what you see, dope.
Owned again and again and again and over and over and over...
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
"2 megapixel is excellent quality...I won't be blowing it up beyond 8x11"
"Finally, why don't you STFU and leave those of us who know what you're talking about alone, ok little boy?"
"2 megapixel IS excellent quality."
"Anyone who tells you different is trying to (and apparently, already has) sold you something...way to be fooled and fulfill the typical American consumer - bigger numbers must mean better!"
"Or are you trying to say I couldn't print that at 8x11" with no problems? The funny thing is, the native size of that photo IS 8x11, crackhead."
"And if you honestly think there's much picture quality difference between your camera and mine, well, I am sure the minimum wage earners hocking phones at best buy aren't laughing at you."
"You honestly think 4 MP is going to give substantially better than my camera's 2 MP? HAHAH and you want to call *me* a dope?"
"you have your opinion (it's wrong, but it's your opinion), I have mine (the right one, as usual)."
"those of us grounded in reality see the truth. There's no difference."
"Sorry...I don't see a difference in picture quality." >>
Tinkerbell's:
Mine:
So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
The thread can be about anything now. Axtelladope made sure of that when he steadfastly refused to comprehend a basic sentence in my very first post here.
Comments
hah just proves what a pathetic, idiotic troll you really are.
Those camera sellin fools sure saw you coming, idiot!
Mark Mulder rookies
Chipper Jones rookies
Orlando Cabrera rookies
Lawrence Taylor
Sam Huff
Lavar Arrington
NY Giants
NY Yankees
NJ Nets
NJ Devils
1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards
Looking for Topps rookies as well.
References:
GregM13
VintageJeff
<< <i>Enlarging your photo and altering mine in a desperate attempt to be 'right'?
hah just proves what a pathetic, idiotic troll you really are.
Those camera sellin fools sure saw you coming, idiot! >>
I adjust all of my photos to 600 x 450, which fit the forum just perfectly. You see, if I put them on here straight from the camera, they are so huge that you would have to scroll forever. The only way I could get your pathetic excuse for a photo side by side with a real one was to make them at 400 x 300. Nice try though
Tell you what, I'll increase yours to 600 x 450 and compare them to some of my outdoor shots. Now we can compare apples to apples.
Yours:
Mine
When you pathetic excuse for a so-called camera can even hold a candle to that, let me know.
Edited to add a couple more
Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007
Al
1..........Axtell is a stupid dope.
2......Axtell sells inferior phones from a kiosk in a mini mall cuz he has been fired from so many jobs he has to work for himself. hence the reason he is online during work.
3......Axtell is so pig headed that even under the most overwhelming evidence that he is wrong he will stubbornly stay with donkey blinders on.
4.....He knows less about cameras then he does about baseball. (which ain't much)
5.....Did I mention he is a stupid dope?
6.....He never did answer my specific questions.
Steve
Did I mention he is stupid?
<< <i>This thread points out a few things.
1..........Axtell is a stupid dope. >>
Another brilliant contribution from the resident troll, WP.
<< <i>2......Axtell sells inferior phones from a kiosk in a mini mall cuz he has been fired from so many jobs he has to work for himself. hence the reason he is online during work. >>
Uhm no I don't work in a kiosk, never been fired from a job, and don't work for myself. And online during work? In case you didn't know it, idiot, anyone who has internet access is online at work.
<< <i>3......Axtell is so pig headed that even under the most overwhelming evidence that he is wrong he will stubbornly stay with donkey blinders on. >>
Sorry...I don't see a difference in picture quality. 'Pig headed'? Utterly brilliant.
<< <i>4.....He knows less about cameras then he does about baseball. (which ain't much) >>
And you're a camera expert now, along with resident baseball bandwagon rider?
<< <i>5.....Did I mention he is a stupid dope? >>
Yes, you've done that 100000 times. And even though you pound it into your keyboard with veins bulging out of your forehead over and over, it doesn't make it true. Sorry, assclown.
<< <i>6.....He never did answer my specific questions. >>
And you've admitted to riding winning team's bandwagons.
Thanks for the help, troll.
you are a dope, no, make that a stupid dope. and yes it is very true.
and NO not everyone (or anyone) with internet access uses the boss's time.
And since you have been proved to be such a liar here I don't believe anything you say. You have been fired from so many jobs prolly cuz you are unmanagable. Hence you now work for yourself in some 3rd rate mall selling inferior phones.
no I never said I was a camera expert. I can read (unlike you) and absorb what is said. (unlike you) therefore I can come to these conclusions.
actually you are a racist, liar, stupid, pigheaded dope.
Steve
<< <i>
<< <i>3......Axtell is so pig headed that even under the most overwhelming evidence that he is wrong he will stubbornly stay with donkey blinders on. >>
Sorry...I don't see a difference in picture quality. 'Pig headed'? Utterly brilliant. >>
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Oh that's too funny, Tinkerbell.
Thank you, again, for showing everyone why your credibility, what you think, and what you say equates to absolutely nothing.
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Did you have many customers at the Radio Shack kiosk today? Did they laugh in your face, as usual, when you attempted to "sell" them on the latest and greatest technology today? Did they give you a funny look when you were checking out a guy that resembles A-Rod? Did a tear come out of your eye went you went home to grandma's basement without making one sale, as usual?
Poor, poor Tinkerbell. No wonder why you send so much time here and the D&D forum.
ahhhhhhhh I was not talking about the pictures. i was reffering to the original post. well actually part 2 of the original post. but that is ok.
the one where you pasted an article from the daily news and were asked a simple question. you know the question, would you also paste the ny post article that rebutted the one from the daily news?
however cuz you have your donkey blinders on and have as usual derailed the thread it went right over your head.
stupid dope that you are.
Steve
Desperate to prove 'I'm right!' and that you didn't get doped into overspending on a 4 MP phone.
Pathetic to keep hounding a point over and over and over....get over yourself.
Awesome photo.
<< <i>Only a desperate and pathetic fool would go through all the trouble of detailing out 'flaws' in a photo. >>
Translation: Tinkerbell just got owned like a $2 ho
<< <i>Desperate to prove 'I'm right!' and that you didn't get doped into overspending on a 4 MP phone. >>
I proved that I was right with the first post and didn't over spend, like your "merchandise"
<< <i>Pathetic to keep hounding a point over and over and over....get over yourself. >>
Pot, meet Tinkerbell
<< <i>Awesome photo.
Thank you
Pathetic to keep hounding a point over and over and over
It is about time you finally admit to these flaws axtell. Hopefully you will admit to all the other character flaws you have soon as well.
Steve
<< <i>
Translation: Tinkerbell just got owned like a $2 ho
>>
I am sure you are intimately familiar with $2 hos, aren't you dirtbag?
<< <i>I proved that I was right with the first post and didn't over spend, like your "merchandise"
Didn't overspend? You bought a 4MP camera because the camera guy has more smarts and is savvier than you, assclown.
<< <i>Pot, meet Tinkerbell >>
/sigh you need new material. '$2 ho' 'pot meet tinkerbell'? I think you've worn these phrases out, moron.
And is that dock your home?
Yeah, I thought so.
I've reduced Tinkerbell to attempted insults
Owned again and again and again and again....
But it's apparent you will never concede you got owned on your camera purchase (much like you'll never concede the texans made the wrong move in passing on Bush).
But, if it helps you sleep better at night thinking these things, go for it.
I am sure your $2 ladies of the night appreciate your money.
Are you banging your keyboard in frustration? Face beet red yet? Smoke coming out of your ears?
It's so much fun proving you wrong over and over and again and again, Tinkerbell.
Go back to work, slacker.
Why aren't you as vocal in the Bush vs. williams thread? Your homie williams is getting his ass handed to him!
Might it be because even a numbskull like you can see the light now, and you don't want to admit it? Don't want to admit that we all were right all along and your miserable franchise made yet another in a long, long line of terrible decisions?
Instead you want to rant on and on and on about 'my camera's better!'
Nice try trying to change the subject. I have proven, beyond a shadow of the doubt, that your "excellent" camera is actually a POS:
Just try to print that picture out to "8x11" and see how it turns out
Dope.
No wonder you don't make any sales at the Radio Shack mini-mall kiosk. Your "pitch" is an insult to real salespeople. Remember, when potential customers walk away from your stand laughing, they aren't laughing with you, they are laughing at you.
Thanks
<< <i>WP can you rename this thread "The great digital picture debate of '06" so I quit checking in to see if it is back on topic?
Thanks >>
Well most, if not all, consider Tinkerbell to be a woman and she was proven wrong, as usual.
So I guess you can consider this thread completely on topic
Then he proceeded to dissect a photo I took with a camera phone (furthering my assumption this forum is his only social interaction).
Then he proceeded to call me tinkerbell a couple hundred times, say I was owned like a '2 dollar ho' a couple hundred times, says 'pot, meet kettle' a few thousand times, and looked every bit the forum tool in doing so.
That's this thread in a nutshell.
"Finally, why don't you STFU and leave those of us who know what you're talking about alone, ok little boy?"
"2 megapixel IS excellent quality."
"Anyone who tells you different is trying to (and apparently, already has) sold you something...way to be fooled and fulfill the typical American consumer - bigger numbers must mean better!"
"Or are you trying to say I couldn't print that at 8x11" with no problems? The funny thing is, the native size of that photo IS 8x11, crackhead."
"And if you honestly think there's much picture quality difference between your camera and mine, well, I am sure the minimum wage earners hocking phones at best buy aren't laughing at you."
"You honestly think 4 MP is going to give substantially better than my camera's 2 MP? HAHAH and you want to call *me* a dope?"
"you have your opinion (it's wrong, but it's your opinion), I have mine (the right one, as usual)."
"those of us grounded in reality see the truth. There's no difference."
"Sorry...I don't see a difference in picture quality."
And what happened to your picture, Tinkerbell?
<< <i>That's this thread in a nutshell. >>
I guess when you are so desperate to prove you didn't get ripped off you're going to yell over and over.
Get lost, dipchit.
<< <i>I haven't changed the location.
I guess when you are so desperate to prove you didn't get ripped off you're going to yell over and over.
Get lost, dipchit. >>
You haven't changed the location? Huh?? What location are you talking about? Are you so frustrated that you can't even think before you type?
Yes, you were proven wrong, again, and now you're sulking. It's okay, Tinkerbell. On to proving you wrong on other lies
>>
You just got done saying, dipchit, that I was 'embarassed' after asking 'what happened to my picture?' as if I moved the photo, or removed it. DO YOU EVEN KNOW WTF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT?
Answer? NO, OBVIOUSLY!
<< <i>Yes, you were proven wrong, again, and now you're sulking. It's okay, Tinkerbell. On to proving you wrong on other lies
The only thing you've ever proven is just how fond you are of $2 ho's, but then when you call one 'mom', you're going to be fond of them.
<< <i>[qYou haven't changed the location? Huh?? What location are you talking about? Are you so frustrated that you can't even think before you type?
>>
You just got done saying, dipchit, that I was 'embarassed' after asking 'what happened to my picture?' as if I moved the photo, or removed it. DO YOU EVEN KNOW WTF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT?
Answer? NO, OBVIOUSLY!
<< <i>Yes, you were proven wrong, again, and now you're sulking. It's okay, Tinkerbell. On to proving you wrong on other lies
The only thing you've ever proven is just how fond you are of $2 ho's, but then when you call one 'mom', you're going to be fond of them. >>
Tinkerbell is so flustered that:
1) Can't quote properly
2) Talking about random locations and actually justifing his brain fart
3) Resorting to "mom" insults
Your embarrassing photo, which you deleted (not "changed the location" :snickers: ), is inferior to mine.
Case closed
The photo is still there, perhaps you'd like to issue a formal apology?
And mom jokes? It's not a joke when it's truth. I am sure all those men who passed in and out of your home when you were a child confused you, calling them 'dad?' as you weren't sure which man your father was.
It also would explain your desperate cries for attention your posts (in particular this thread) show you to be.
Go to yahoo photos, look for my id (axtell2k3) and then find my photos...you'll see they haven't been touched.
Then, come back, bow down, and beg my forgiveness. Until then? STFU, troll.
<< <i>The photo is still there, perhaps you'd like to issue a formal apology? >>
Oh for the love of....
Here is the link of that picture:
http://us.a2.yahoofs.com/users/YTFlBYZelVw2/__sr_/947a.jpg?tkn=phQtVLFBn7diFP44&saveas=minicooper
Copy and paste in your browser and tell me what you see.
Dope.
I just logged into my yahoo account, photos are there.
Dope.
Get lost.
<< <i>I can't help it if you are a dope.
I just logged into my yahoo account, photos are there.
Dope.
Get lost. >>
Here is your original post, dope.
<< <i>You ladies sure do need a new hobby, other than hounding me about a photo.
Here you go...hey stownie, how's the resolution on that camera on your blackberry? Oh wait, YOU DON'T HAVE A CAMERA.
See that red x right there, dope?
Here is that link:
http://us.a2.yahoofs.com/users/YTFlBYZelVw2/__sr_/947a.jpg?tkn=phQtVLFBn7diFP44&saveas=minicooper
Put it in your browser and tell me what you see, dope.
Owned again and again and again and over and over and over...
I logged into my yahoo photo account.
The photos are there.
GTFO of here you mindless idiot!
<< <i>RETARD.
I logged into my yahoo photo account.
The photos are there.
GTFO of here you mindless idiot! >>
How come the picture isn't here anymore, huh?
Why are you insisting that we log into yahoo to see it, hmmm?
What are you up to, Tinkerbell?
Edited to add:
How come this link doesn't work anymore, hmmmm???
http://us.a2.yahoofs.com/users/YTFlBYZelVw2/__sr_/947a.jpg?tkn=phQtVLFBn7diFP44&saveas=minicooper
<< <i>How come the picture isn't here anymore, huh?
>>
Can't tell you that...why don't you email yahoo and find out, and quit busting my balls, princess?
<< <i>Why are you insisting that we log into yahoo to see it, hmmm? >>
'we'? What, you got a rat in your pocket, dipchit? You're the only one talking...and no one's 'insisting' anything, moron.
<< <i>What are you up to, Tinkerbell? >>
Up to nothing, retard. Don't you have a bottle to take before your nap?
What part of 'GTFO out of here' didn't you understand? Perhaps you need your head beaten in so you'll understand?
"Finally, why don't you STFU and leave those of us who know what you're talking about alone, ok little boy?"
"2 megapixel IS excellent quality."
"Anyone who tells you different is trying to (and apparently, already has) sold you something...way to be fooled and fulfill the typical American consumer - bigger numbers must mean better!"
"Or are you trying to say I couldn't print that at 8x11" with no problems? The funny thing is, the native size of that photo IS 8x11, crackhead."
"And if you honestly think there's much picture quality difference between your camera and mine, well, I am sure the minimum wage earners hocking phones at best buy aren't laughing at you."
"You honestly think 4 MP is going to give substantially better than my camera's 2 MP? HAHAH and you want to call *me* a dope?"
"you have your opinion (it's wrong, but it's your opinion), I have mine (the right one, as usual)."
"those of us grounded in reality see the truth. There's no difference."
"Sorry...I don't see a difference in picture quality." >>
Tinkerbell's:
Mine:
The thread should be renamed:
Axtell shows his stupidness again.
Steve