Home Sports Talk

looks like some of you ladies were wrong.

2

Comments

  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    That's what i thought image

    And PS - My pictures speak for themselves. Obviously, and always, your lack of backing anything you say up speaks VOLUMES image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    Still waiting for that 2 MP picture your super-duper phone takes, Tinkerbell.

    All bark and no bite, as usual image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    yeah, it speaks to your desperation for acceptance from the geek squad at best buy where you bought your camera.

    "If I buy this camera, can I hang with you guys? PLEASE? I'll do anything you ask!"

  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>yeah, it speaks to your desperation for acceptance from the geek squad at best buy where you bought your camera.

    "If I buy this camera, can I hang with you guys? PLEASE? I'll do anything you ask!" >>



    Actually, I bought my Nikon CoolPix at Wolf Camera. It was cheap, very portable, and takes some amazing shots (as seen in numerous threads). Photography is a small hobby of mine and it's something I enjoy image

    Still waiting for those pics, Tinkerbell.
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • Ax-There is a HUGE difference from even 2MP to 3MP. Go ahead, take a great picture with a 2MP camera; just make sure NOTHING moves at all; otherwise your photo is shot. I don't even own a digital camera; I have old school mid 70's 35mm manual SLR Nikon. Same things most people used in Photography class in high school. Haven't bought a digital yet, waiting on my production company to order mine. Why? My out of pocket expenses will be NADA. I guarentee you my old hunk o junk will outshoot any 2MP camera on the market.
    Collecting;
    Mark Mulder rookies
    Chipper Jones rookies
    Orlando Cabrera rookies
    Lawrence Taylor
    Sam Huff
    Lavar Arrington
    NY Giants
    NY Yankees
    NJ Nets
    NJ Devils
    1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards

    Looking for Topps rookies as well.

    References:
    GregM13
    VintageJeff
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>Ax-There is a HUGE difference from even 2MP to 3MP. Go ahead, take a great picture with a 2MP camera; just make sure NOTHING moves at all; otherwise your photo is shot. I don't even own a digital camera; I have old school mid 70's 35mm manual SLR Nikon. Same things most people used in Photography class in high school. Haven't bought a digital yet, waiting on my production company to order mine. Why? My out of pocket expenses will be NADA. I guarentee you my old hunk o junk will outshoot any 2MP camera on the market. >>



    So you admit you don't own a digital camera, yet you 'guarentee' (err, guarantee you mean?) it will outshoot any 2 MP on the market?

    Uhm, did you forget your medication?

  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    I see Axtell is now on to correcting people. It usually winds up that way when he is shown to be a DOPE.





    Steve

    image
    Good for you.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    What does my posting an article (that I didn't write, mind you) about jeter's failings as captain have to do with 2 threads that were posted (again, not by me) in which torre was reportedly fired?


    yesterday axtelladope said this.


    Dopey listen, it had nothing to do with the 2 threads I posted. What it did have to do with was the article you posted from the daily news. And I had no beef with the article.

    My question (which you never answered btw) was 'are you also going to post the article that was in the ny post (yesterday) in the forum as well' ? Since you never did I will take it as 'no' you will not. Even though you were too stupid to even see that it was a question.


    you then go off on 20 different tangents (of course accusing me of doing so) Had you just went back and simply reread the very first post you would have not shown yourself to be a FOOL. AGAIN.

    You were relegated to finding spelling errors on peoples parts cuz you are so stupid and have problems reading a basic sentence.

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    Why hasn't Tinkerbell produced a picture?

    a) The photo she attempted to take was crappy at best
    b) She doesn't have the new and improved 360 spin
    c) She can't admit to being proven wrong, as usual
    d) All the above

    I vote "d" image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts


  • << <i>

    << <i>Ax-There is a HUGE difference from even 2MP to 3MP. Go ahead, take a great picture with a 2MP camera; just make sure NOTHING moves at all; otherwise your photo is shot. I don't even own a digital camera; I have old school mid 70's 35mm manual SLR Nikon. Same things most people used in Photography class in high school. Haven't bought a digital yet, waiting on my production company to order mine. Why? My out of pocket expenses will be NADA. I guarentee you my old hunk o junk will outshoot any 2MP camera on the market. >>



    So you admit you don't own a digital camera, yet you 'guarentee' (err, guarantee you mean?) it will outshoot any 2 MP on the market?

    Uhm, did you forget your medication? >>



    I don't own one personally, but my restoration company(I'm an apprentice there, and the only employee) we have 2 to document before and after; and the magazine I work with I use them all the time. And yes, the thing is 2MP is junk. Go ahead, take a picture with it.


    BTW, our boy Torre is still there. The "most underrated"(Your words, not mine) Sweet Lou Pinella, didn't get the gig. I'm glad.
    Collecting;
    Mark Mulder rookies
    Chipper Jones rookies
    Orlando Cabrera rookies
    Lawrence Taylor
    Sam Huff
    Lavar Arrington
    NY Giants
    NY Yankees
    NJ Nets
    NJ Devils
    1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards

    Looking for Topps rookies as well.

    References:
    GregM13
    VintageJeff
  • What, no picture? You probably don't even have that phone lol, nice try radioshack boy.
    Collecting;
    Mark Mulder rookies
    Chipper Jones rookies
    Orlando Cabrera rookies
    Lawrence Taylor
    Sam Huff
    Lavar Arrington
    NY Giants
    NY Yankees
    NJ Nets
    NJ Devils
    1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards

    Looking for Topps rookies as well.

    References:
    GregM13
    VintageJeff
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    Looks like Tinkerbell was at a loss for words.. I mean yapping image

    Last Visited On: October 11th, 2006 10:43 AM
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    You ladies sure do need a new hobby, other than hounding me about a photo.

    Here you go...hey stownie, how's the resolution on that camera on your blackberry? Oh wait, YOU DON'T HAVE A CAMERA.

    image
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>You ladies sure do need a new hobby, other than hounding me about a photo.

    Here you go...hey stownie, how's the resolution on that camera on your blackberry? Oh wait, YOU DON'T HAVE A CAMERA.

    image >>



    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight...

    Couldn't produce a picture from your phone until now and attempt to pass off that? And you think that can blow up to, as you say, 8x11 without any problems? And you honeslty think that's a clear image??

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Okay Tinerbell, whatever you say...

    : snickers :
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    What are you talking about? I was working in the yard before work this morning...unlike dopes like you who sit on here with their thumbs in their asses.

    So you sat here all day, wildly refreshing and refreshing, hoping with baited breath for me to post a photo, waiting for a glimpse into what it's like to have a high quality camera in their phone?

    Are you trying to say I *didn't* take that with a 2 MP camera phone? Or are you trying to say I couldn't print that at 8x11" with no problems? The funny thing is, the native size of that photo IS 8x11, crackhead.
  • If anyone blows that up to roughly 8x10-11 size you can more clearly see that the picture sucks.


    "waiting for a glimpse into what it's like to have a high quality camera in their phone?"

    Yet, it isn't even near the best camera phone on the market.
    Collecting;
    Mark Mulder rookies
    Chipper Jones rookies
    Orlando Cabrera rookies
    Lawrence Taylor
    Sam Huff
    Lavar Arrington
    NY Giants
    NY Yankees
    NJ Nets
    NJ Devils
    1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards

    Looking for Topps rookies as well.

    References:
    GregM13
    VintageJeff
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    You don't have to blow it up, twit, to get it to 8x11.

    "Photo Details
    Image size: 1600x1200 pixels
    Prints best up to: 8x10 Print
    Camera: Unknown
    Date uploaded: October 11, 2006 "

  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    more bla bla bla from the resident dope. I see how she avoided answering my question, yet whenever she asks a question (which usually derails a thread) she demands over and over that you answer it.


    oh and we also had this gem from, axtelladope:




    And wp, I thought you were a mets fan? Why do you care what happens in yankeeville?

    This from a self proclaimed M's fan, who wishes for a 2nd place finish mind you, who copied and pasted an article from a newspaper that is almost 4000 miles away. Yes dopey I know it was off the internet.

    meanwhile, I live 30 minutes from yankee stadium, and he asks why i care what happens in Yankeeville. Earth to dopey: many ny's root for both teams.

    lastly, I have a challenge for axtell, go back to page 1 of this thread and re read what I said. then come back here and pretend that you are confused still. sadly, I am asking for alot as he is so stupid that he prolly does not understand that basic sentence.

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>
    meanwhile, I live 30 minutes from yankee stadium, and he asks why i care what happens in Yankeeville. Earth to dopey: many ny's root for both teams.
    >>



    Hmm both teams? Funny that you pick and choose when to root for both teams...bandwagoning, even.

    So you're a yankees AND mets bandwagon rider? THAT's impressive!
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    What is more impressive is that you blew off the challenge. More proof that you are a dope.


    thanks for confirming it. (again)


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    Look, WP-

    You called me out by name in the original post, even though I didn't post any threads mentioning Torre, I simply responded to them based on info I saw on ESPN.

    Second, the post I posted was about jeter and his failures as captain, which wasn't written by me, either.

    Finally, when you can tell me why you decided to call me out by name in regards to the torre threads, when there were PLENTY of other people who commented on them (and 2 who started threads), then I might listen to you.

    Until then, STFU.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>What are you talking about? I was working in the yard before work this morning...unlike dopes like you who sit on here with their thumbs in their asses.

    So you sat here all day, wildly refreshing and refreshing, hoping with baited breath for me to post a photo, waiting for a glimpse into what it's like to have a high quality camera in their phone?

    Are you trying to say I *didn't* take that with a 2 MP camera phone? Or are you trying to say I couldn't print that at 8x11" with no problems? The funny thing is, the native size of that photo IS 8x11, crackhead. >>



    You were working in the lawn yet had the chance to log in earlier, huh? Funny how you couldn't produce a picture last night... Did you have to run up to work (the Radio Shack in a local retail center, as shown in the picture) and borrow someone's phone, Tinkerbell? Obviously so since you couldn't produce a simple photo last night image

    And the "native" size IS 8x11? Thank you for showing everyone your stupidity, again, Tinkerbell.

    Oh and picture saved image

    image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • softparadesoftparade Posts: 9,281 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ax, your car? Man, that thing would get stuck in the treads of a rig without the driver knowing it!

    ISO 1978 Topps Baseball in NM-MT High Grade Raw 3, 100, 103, 302, 347, 376, 416, 466, 481, 487, 509, 534, 540, 554, 579, 580, 622, 642, 673, 724__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ISO 1978 O-Pee-Chee in NM-MT High Grade Raw12, 21, 29, 38, 49, 65, 69, 73, 74, 81, 95, 100, 104, 110, 115, 122, 132, 133, 135, 140, 142, 151, 153, 155, 160, 161, 167, 168, 172, 179, 181, 196, 200, 204, 210, 224, 231, 240

  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    okie dopey axtelladopa


    Anyone else find it funny that out of all the people that posted that torre would be fired only axtell replied? I guess the title 'looks like some of you ladies were wrong' made her answer. proving she is a bit...

    also the dope still thinks that the sentence in which I called him out on is in regard to Torre


    LISTEN DOPEY

    also, in the post, Brooks writes that jeter is not to blame for arods failures. I guess he is just trying to balance out the malarky that harper wrote yesterday. I wonder if ms. axtell will post this article?


    Where in that sentence do you see the name Torre? Everyone else with reading capabilities can clearly see that in was in reference to the article YOU posted the day before.

    You can't make this stuff up.


    LOL

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>
    You were working in the lawn yet had the chance to log in earlier, huh?
    >>



    Yeah, I checked messages but didn't sit down to post. unlike you, who sits here refreshing like a madman waiting for me to reply.



    << <i>Funny how you couldn't produce a picture last night... >>



    Uhm it was dark last night dopey, and I wanted a photo taken under real light.



    << <i> Did you have to run up to work (the Radio Shack in a local retail center, as shown in the picture) and borrow someone's phone, Tinkerbell? Obviously so since you couldn't produce a simple photo last night image >>



    Again, since I don't work at radio shack, NO, moron.



    << <i>And the "native" size IS 8x11? Thank you for showing everyone your stupidity, again, Tinkerbell. >>



    And thank you for showing your obssessiveness with everything about me, troll.

    And save that photo...and see what it's like to have a car to drive to work - I am sure that BMX bike you're riding is a lot of fun!

  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>Ax, your car? Man, that thing would get stuck in the treads of a rig without the driver knowing it! >>



    yeah it's mine, and it's a blast. I laugh at the clowns in SUVs drowning in gas payments as much as their car payments.

    And stuck in the threads of a rig? Nah, I am far too good a driver and far too quick to get into things like that.

  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    ok almost time to put this one to bed. dopey has again proved to the forum how sad and pathetic his life is, when he can't even simply admit that he misread a thread.


    sad actually.


    I'm sure she will counter with some BS and have to have the last word.

    steve
    Good for you.
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>
    Anyone else find it funny that out of all the people that posted that torre would be fired only axtell replied? I guess the title 'looks like some of you ladies were wrong' made her answer. proving she is a bit...
    >>



    No you simple minded dipchit, in the post, you said, and I will quote (again, as you are obviously dumb as a rock):



    << <i>I wonder if ms. axtell will post this article? >>



    Now, eat it, wp.




    << <i>also the dope still thinks that the sentence in which I called him out on is in regard to Torre >>



    Hmm seems as though the point of your article was in reference to Torre, and his keeping his job, was it not? Hmmmm I think so!



    Now, GTFO of here and take a nap.
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    And now, predictably, stown will take some time between posts to make it look like he's not so desperate as to reply immediately after my posts.

    What an ass clown.
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    << I wonder if ms. axtell will post this article? >>

    Yes I did say that. Now listen closely because it is you that seems to be thick headed here.

    very slowy. The day before you copied and pasted an article that was from the daily news. Yes or No? And the gist of that article was (your title even said 'jeter abondons ship') And the gist was regarding how jeter should have came out and cuddled arod. Yes or No? Well now this is where you have to allow in a new thought. In that sentence I asked you if you would ALSO copy and paste the article that basically rebutted the ARTICLE that you originally copied and pasted. That is the reason I asked if you would also copy and paste that one AS WELL. It had nothing to do with Joe Torre. The first sentence did and it was to all that had claimed he would be fired. Now I know you may have difficulty (only cuz your are a cement head) but surely as everyone, and I mean everyone here now sees that.

    to continue arguing only continues to prove what almost everyone here thinks of you.


    You can't be this stupid.

    no one can be.


    Steve
    Good for you.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>And now, predictably, stown will take some time between posts to make it look like he's not so desperate as to reply immediately after my posts.

    What an ass clown. >>



    Hey Tinkerbell, when that lightbulb is blue, it means that person isn't on.

    Dope.

    We could go back and forth on this but we all know why it took you sooooooooo long to post one picture, Tinkerbell.

    image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • WinPitcherWinPitcher Posts: 27,726 ✭✭✭
    Hey Tinkerbell, when that lightbulb is blue, it means that person isn't on.


    lol yeah she learned that just recently.

    was on here calling someone out, proclaiming "I know you are on I can see the blue light is on" lol Pandrews was kind and simply reminded her that blue means off.

    Steve
    Good for you.
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    WP-

    That was months and months ago...but thanks for pointing it out. yes, I mistakenly thought that the blue light meant online. I am sure with your infinite brain power you know everything about everything.

    But, in light of the tragic accident involving Corey Lidle, I am done bickering with you clowns...there are far better things to do.

    Good day.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>But, in light of the tragic accident involving Corey Lidle, I am done bickering with you clowns...there are far better things to do. >>



    Translation: I've been owned like a $2 ho and running away with my tail inbetween my legs image

    Oh and Tinkerbell, I just took this picture from my living room. So I'm inside, looking out through a window, with a back light, and it's been resized.

    image

    Compared to you being outside, on a clear day, with zero obstructions.

    image

    Yeah... No difference what so ever image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    stown-

    good to see you have such respect for the dead.

  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭


    << <i>stown-

    good to see you have such respect for the dead. >>



    I paid my respects, dope.

    Unfortunately, people die every single day; that's just life. You spew hatred every single day.

    Pot meet Tinkerbell.

    Go sell some overrated cell phones with limited camera capabilities, Radio Shack boy.
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>
    Go sell some overrated cell phones with limited camera capabilities, Radio Shack boy. >>



    You never told me how the camera was on your blackberry.

    And if you honestly think there's much picture quality difference between your camera and mine, well, I am sure the minimum wage earners hocking phones at best buy aren't laughing at you.

    No, they're not.

    Really, they didn't snicker when you walked out the door (or wherever the hell you bought your overpriced and overhyped camera).

    Overrated cell phones? Hah. Dope, you own a blackberry, the most overrated of any mobile device ever. Push email! For those too lazy to check their email!

  • Radioshack boy sounds angry. Why are you mad that others hock electronics? You do the exact same thing, remember?
    Collecting;
    Mark Mulder rookies
    Chipper Jones rookies
    Orlando Cabrera rookies
    Lawrence Taylor
    Sam Huff
    Lavar Arrington
    NY Giants
    NY Yankees
    NJ Nets
    NJ Devils
    1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards

    Looking for Topps rookies as well.

    References:
    GregM13
    VintageJeff
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>Radioshack boy sounds angry. Why are you mad that others hock electronics? You do the exact same thing, remember? >>



    I'm not mad at them...I applaud them for taking advantage of gullible dopes who think they have to have the latest and greatest....I am sure you're in that boat too.

  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    Huh?!? Are you blind, Tinkerbell? Seriously, are you?

    Picture A taken inside and through a window.

    Picture B taken outside and an unobstructed view.

    imageimage

    Even giving you an advantage, picture A is significantly far more cleaner, sharper, and detailed.

    It's so easy proving you wrong over and over and again and again, Tinkerbell image

    Now as I was saying, go back inside your mini-mall and try to sell those overrated phones with limited camera capabilities, Radio Shack boy image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>
    Picture A taken inside and through a window.

    Picture B taken outside and an unobstructed view.
    >>



    Of COURSE you are going to try desperately to see a significant difference - dude its just not there. I'm sorry you got DOPED into buying a $500-$600 6 MP camera - there's just no need for it. I am sorry dopey, you might have been able to finish your set with the money you wasted on that camera.



    << <i>Now as I was saying, go back inside your mini-mall and try to sell those overrated phones with limited camera capabilities, Radio Shack boy image >>



    Hey princess, how's that camera working on that blackberry? Oh that's right, you prefer to carry around 2 devices that ONE can do just as well. I guess the word convergence never made it into your vocabulary.

  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    image

    You really should stop touching yourself while thinking of A-Rod because you are blind, dope.

    Iroinically, you attempt to convince people that they should "have the latest and greatest" at Radio Shack, dope.

    And guess what, I only paid $150 for my 4 mg camera, dope.

    It's sooooooooo easy to prove you wrong, dope.

    Now get back to your store, Tinkerbell (thought I was going to call you dope again, huh?)

    image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    I'm done debating with you, clown.

    You honestly think 4 MP is going to give substantially better than my camera's 2 MP? HAHAH and you want to call *me* a dope?

    Wow, $150 huh? I guess they don't pay those nudie booth moppers much, huh?

    You had to save what, a year for that scratch?

    Get lost clown, oops I mean stown. You're nothing more than a troll, with an intellect to match.
  • 4MP is superior to 2MP. It's that simple. Also, you seem to skim over the cost of the new Razr; which is quite high for only having a 2MP camera. Nowhere near the best on the market, for the price.
    Collecting;
    Mark Mulder rookies
    Chipper Jones rookies
    Orlando Cabrera rookies
    Lawrence Taylor
    Sam Huff
    Lavar Arrington
    NY Giants
    NY Yankees
    NJ Nets
    NJ Devils
    1950s-1960s Topps NY Giants Team cards

    Looking for Topps rookies as well.

    References:
    GregM13
    VintageJeff
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    Picture A taken inside and through a window.

    Picture B taken outside and an unobstructed view.

    imageimage

    image

    Attention Radio Shack customers, Tinkerbell just got owned, again, and as usual image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭
    stownie-

    you have your opinion (it's wrong, but it's your opinion), I have mine (the right one, as usual).



    << <i>4MP is superior to 2MP. It's that simple. Also, you seem to skim over the cost of the new Razr; which is quite high for only having a 2MP camera. Nowhere near the best on the market, for the price. >>



    Please tell me why YOU think it's superior. I am willing to bet you're going to say 'its got more megapixels!!!'

    And please tell me a phone in the US with a better camera...all sorts of phones in Europe and Asia have up to 5 MP cameras - 2 MP is currently the finest available camera in the states.

    As well as the cost of the RAZR, when did cost ever come into it? Cost was never a consideration.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    It's so obvious, Tinkerbell image

    imageimage

    Keep playing stupid. Oh that's right, you really are that stupid.
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
  • AxtellAxtell Posts: 10,037 ✭✭


    << <i>It's so obvious, Tinkerbell image >>



    Obvious to you in your desperation in trying to say 'no, MY camera's better!!!!' perhaps, those of us grounded in reality see the truth. There's no difference.
  • stownstown Posts: 11,321 ✭✭✭
    Because mine IS better, dope image

    [imageimage

    Kids, let this be a lesson to you. When one constantly touches him/herself while fantasizing about A-Rod, you will go blind image
    So basically my kid won't be able to go to college, but at least I'll have a set where the three most expensive cards are of a player I despise ~ CDsNuts
Sign In or Register to comment.